ATL: IRENE - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- PTrackerLA
- Category 5
- Posts: 5277
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
- Location: Lafayette, LA
- DESTRUCTION5
- Category 5
- Posts: 4423
- Age: 43
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
- Location: Stuart, FL
Re: ATL: IRENE - Models
HOUR: 60.0 LONG: -77.29 LAT: 27.12 MIN PRESS (hPa): 929.78 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS):123.79
Peaks Just E of Gran Bahama in 60 Hrs as a Cat 4...
0 likes
GATOR NATION IS E V E R Y W H E R E !
Re:
PTrackerLA wrote:I just don't see Irene strengthening up to landfall like the GFDL shows.
whats going to stop her? aint going to be heat content...


http://wxmaps.org/pix/hurpot.html#ATL
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRENE - Models
SouthFloridawx wrote:clefnwi, where do you find that output for the HWRF model?
I get the stats files from here: http://www.ftp.ncep.noaa.gov/data/nccf/com/hur/prod/ and wind swath graphics from here: http://coaps.fsu.edu/~maue/weather/
Last edited by clfenwi on Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRENE - Models
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:HOUR: 60.0 LONG: -77.29 LAT: 27.12 MIN PRESS (hPa): 929.78 MAX SURF WIND (KNOTS):123.79
Peaks Just E of Gran Bahama in 60 Hrs as a Cat 4...
that is a monster...
0 likes
- SouthFloridawx
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8346
- Age: 46
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
- Location: Sarasota, FL
- Contact:
Re: ATL: IRENE - Models
clfenwi wrote:SouthFloridawx wrote:clefnwi, where do you find that output for the HWRF model?
I get the stats files from here: http://www.ftp.ncep.noaa.gov/data/nccf/com/hur/prod/
Do you create your own graphics?
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRENE - Models
What is disconcerting about the GFS, HWRF, and GFS is that they all yank the storm northward after the Outer Banks. You don't get the typical sideswipe and out to see, but rather a direct hit on the Mid-Atlantic.
0 likes
- micktooth
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 3:47 pm
- Location: PreK:New Orleans,PostK:Colorado
Re: ATL: IRENE - Models
Great discussion from Dr Masters at Wunderground regarding models:
A research project funded by NOAA known as the Joint Hurricane Testbed has produced a remarkable number of tools now in operational use at the National Hurricane Center to improve hurricane forecasts and warnings. One of these projects, called "Prediction of Consensus TC Track Forecast Error and Correctors to Improve Consensus TC Track Forecasts", was an effort by Dr. Jim Goerss at the Navy Research Lab to improve the accuracy of the NHC "cone of uncertainty" (AKA the "Cone of Death") showing where a storm is expected to track 2/3 of the time. The radius of the circles that make up the cone are based on error statistics of the official NHC forecast over the past five years. We can expect in certain situations, such as when the models are in substantial disagreement, a consensus forecast made using these models will have much greater than average errors. Since the NHC typically bases their forecast on a consensus forecast made using a combination of reliable hurricane forecasting models, it is instructive to view the "GPCE" (Goerss Prediction Consensus Error) circles to see if the uncertainty cone should be smaller or larger than usual. The consensus forecast I'll look at is called "TVCN", and is constructed by averaging the track forecasts made by most of (or all) of these models: GFS, ECMWF, NOGAPS, GFDL, HWRF, GFDN, and UKMET. In the case of this morning's 12 UTC (8am EDT) runs of these models, here is what the radius of the "cone of uncertainty" should be, in nautical miles:
12 hours: 27 nm
24 hours: 44 nm
36 hours: 64 nm
48 hours: 81 nm
72 hours: 137 nm
96 hours: 201 nm
120 hours: 308 nm
And here is the radius of NHC's "cone of uncertainty" for their official forecast, based on the average errors for the past five years:
12 hours: 36 nm
24 hours: 59 nm
36 hours: 79 nm
48 hours: 98 nm
72 hours: 144 nm
96 hours: 190 nm
120 hours: 239 nm
So, the GPCE error estimates are showing that the latest forecasts for Irene are better than average over the 1 - 3 day time period, and worse than average for 4 - 5 days. Note the error estimate of 308 nm (355 miles) for today's 5-day forecast. That's more than the distance from New York City to Boston, suggesting that we really don't know what portions of New England might be at most risk from Irene. It is still quite possible the core of the hurricane could miss New England.
A research project funded by NOAA known as the Joint Hurricane Testbed has produced a remarkable number of tools now in operational use at the National Hurricane Center to improve hurricane forecasts and warnings. One of these projects, called "Prediction of Consensus TC Track Forecast Error and Correctors to Improve Consensus TC Track Forecasts", was an effort by Dr. Jim Goerss at the Navy Research Lab to improve the accuracy of the NHC "cone of uncertainty" (AKA the "Cone of Death") showing where a storm is expected to track 2/3 of the time. The radius of the circles that make up the cone are based on error statistics of the official NHC forecast over the past five years. We can expect in certain situations, such as when the models are in substantial disagreement, a consensus forecast made using these models will have much greater than average errors. Since the NHC typically bases their forecast on a consensus forecast made using a combination of reliable hurricane forecasting models, it is instructive to view the "GPCE" (Goerss Prediction Consensus Error) circles to see if the uncertainty cone should be smaller or larger than usual. The consensus forecast I'll look at is called "TVCN", and is constructed by averaging the track forecasts made by most of (or all) of these models: GFS, ECMWF, NOGAPS, GFDL, HWRF, GFDN, and UKMET. In the case of this morning's 12 UTC (8am EDT) runs of these models, here is what the radius of the "cone of uncertainty" should be, in nautical miles:
12 hours: 27 nm
24 hours: 44 nm
36 hours: 64 nm
48 hours: 81 nm
72 hours: 137 nm
96 hours: 201 nm
120 hours: 308 nm
And here is the radius of NHC's "cone of uncertainty" for their official forecast, based on the average errors for the past five years:
12 hours: 36 nm
24 hours: 59 nm
36 hours: 79 nm
48 hours: 98 nm
72 hours: 144 nm
96 hours: 190 nm
120 hours: 239 nm
So, the GPCE error estimates are showing that the latest forecasts for Irene are better than average over the 1 - 3 day time period, and worse than average for 4 - 5 days. Note the error estimate of 308 nm (355 miles) for today's 5-day forecast. That's more than the distance from New York City to Boston, suggesting that we really don't know what portions of New England might be at most risk from Irene. It is still quite possible the core of the hurricane could miss New England.
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRENE - Models
GFDL Swath

SouthFloridawx, I didn't quite grasp you question at first. Graphics come from Dr. Ryan Maue's siteat FSU.

SouthFloridawx, I didn't quite grasp you question at first. Graphics come from Dr. Ryan Maue's siteat FSU.
0 likes
- PTrackerLA
- Category 5
- Posts: 5277
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
- Location: Lafayette, LA
Re: Re:
ROCK wrote:PTrackerLA wrote:I just don't see Irene strengthening up to landfall like the GFDL shows.
whats going to stop her? aint going to be heat content...![]()
![]()
http://wxmaps.org/pix/hurpot.html#ATL
Just my personal opinion. Kind of using Floyd as a comparison storm here and it weakened dramatically. As well as just about every other hurricane that tries to hit the US as a cat 3

0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
hmm that NNW turn is intriguing..
obviously nothing to pick it up really still just the weakness and the ridge to the east.
obviously nothing to pick it up really still just the weakness and the ridge to the east.
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
- BensonTCwatcher
- Category 5
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:11 pm
- Location: Southport NC
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
- Meteorcane
- Category 2
- Posts: 559
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 6:49 am
- Location: North Platte Nebraska
- sfwx
- Category 1
- Posts: 371
- Age: 59
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:53 pm
- Location: Rural St. Lucie County, Fl
Re: ATL: IRENE - Models
SUMMARY OF 200 PM EDT...1800 UTC...INFORMATION
----------------------------------------------
LOCATION...20.7N 71.2W
ABOUT 55 MI...90 KM S OF GRAND TURK ISLAND
ABOUT 70 MI...115 KM NNW OF PUERTO PLATA DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS...100 MPH...160 KM/H
PRESENT MOVEMENT...WNW OR 295 DEGREES AT 10 MPH...17 KM/HMINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...977 MB...28.85 INCHES
----------------------------------------------
LOCATION...20.7N 71.2W
ABOUT 55 MI...90 KM S OF GRAND TURK ISLAND
ABOUT 70 MI...115 KM NNW OF PUERTO PLATA DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS...100 MPH...160 KM/H
PRESENT MOVEMENT...WNW OR 295 DEGREES AT 10 MPH...17 KM/HMINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...977 MB...28.85 INCHES
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
- Location: Toms River, NJ
Re: ATL: IRENE - Models
These model runs are beginning to get a bit scary, there's been runs in the past that have a hurricane getting up here, but we are in that 4-5 day time range now and the accuracy slowly goes up. We just had an earthquake in Virginia, imagine a hurricane up here too in the same week.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:31 am
Re: ATL: IRENE - Models
Up here in NY we felt the earthquake as well, but i just thought it was my car misfiring.
With the latest 12z GFS run, this storm is looking very angry, and seems to have its eye set on the outer banks, then across long island. Pretty sure that if we take a direct hit (long island) from at least a cat 1, fire island will now be an inlet.
Watching this afternoon and tonight's models very intently.
With the latest 12z GFS run, this storm is looking very angry, and seems to have its eye set on the outer banks, then across long island. Pretty sure that if we take a direct hit (long island) from at least a cat 1, fire island will now be an inlet.
Watching this afternoon and tonight's models very intently.
0 likes
- SouthFloridawx
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8346
- Age: 46
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
- Location: Sarasota, FL
- Contact:
-
- Admin
- Posts: 20009
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: IRENE - Models
Saved images, gfdl




0 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 500
- Age: 69
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 10:43 am
- Location: Jupiter, FL
- Contact:
Re: ATL: IRENE - Models
sfwx wrote:SUMMARY OF 200 PM EDT...1800 UTC...INFORMATION
----------------------------------------------
LOCATION...20.7N 71.2W
ABOUT 55 MI...90 KM S OF GRAND TURK ISLAND
ABOUT 70 MI...115 KM NNW OF PUERTO PLATA DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS...100 MPH...160 KM/H
PRESENT MOVEMENT...WNW OR 295 DEGREES AT 10 MPH...17 KM/HMINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...977 MB...28.85 INCHES
8:00 AM 20.6. 70.6. 2:00PM 20.8, 71.2. I think it is moving more west, and slower, that currently indicated. But that is sure to change.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests