
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
12z NAM +60 (for synoptic purposes only)

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Moderator: S2k Moderators
CrazyC83 wrote:If that GFDL run verifies, my area can expect catastrophic flooding...
Portastorm wrote:SouthFloridawx wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:If that GFDL run verifies, my area can expect catastrophic flooding...
Where is your area?
Yeah Crazy ... how about adding a location to your profile.
wxman57 wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:If that GFDL run verifies, my area can expect catastrophic flooding...
I don't think I'd tend to believe the model which has performed worst (with the possible exception of the UKMET) with Irene for the past week. And we're actually looking at the NAM now for a hurricane track? The NAM is only second to NOGAPS in a race for the worst hurricane model (excluding LBAR).
wxman57 wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:If that GFDL run verifies, my area can expect catastrophic flooding...
I don't think I'd tend to believe the model which has performed worst (with the possible exception of the UKMET) with Irene for the past week. And we're actually looking at the NAM now for a hurricane track? The NAM is only second to NOGAPS in a race for the worst hurricane model (excluding LBAR).
PTrackerLA wrote:A professional met on here posted a few days ago that Irene would scare the entire east coast while staying offshore, looks like he may be right but I would have to dig through this thread to remember who it was. Good call though!
PTrackerLA wrote:A professional met on here posted a few days ago that Irene would scare the entire east coast while staying offshore, looks like he may be right but I would have to dig through this thread to remember who it was. Good call though!
PTrackerLA wrote:A professional met on here posted a few days ago that Irene would scare the entire east coast while staying offshore, looks like he may be right but I would have to dig through this thread to remember who it was. Good call though!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests