meriland23 wrote:NOGAPS is well known for accurate long term forecasting.

The best-performing dynamical model in 2010 was EMXI, followed by GFSI. The GHMI, GF5I, HWFI, and EGRI made up the “second tier” of three-dimensional dynamical models, and NGPI and GFNI performed less well, with skill comparable to or even lower than the two-dimensional BAM collection.
where the ending I's mean the last-model run interpolated to the current position, EMX=ECMWF, GFSI=GFS, GHMI=GFDL, HWFI=HWRF, EGRI=EGRR, NGPI=NOGAPS, and GFNI=GFDN.[/quote]
This doesn't necessarily mean that NOGAPS can't be right in a given situation, but to favor it over the more reliable ECMWF and GFS requires an explanation of why the synoptic handling is better in the former than the latter two star performers.