LarryWx wrote:Gustywind wrote:From SSD
06/0600 UTC 10.2N 32.5W T1.5/1.5 95L
05/2345 UTC 10.3N 31.2W T1.5/1.5 95L
IF 95L is truly only close to 32.5W as of 6Z, then I could say with certainty that the 0Z and 6Z GFS runs are initializing 95L quite a bit too far west...about 4 degrees. That 4 deg. may be quite crucial as both the GFS and Euro runs of the last few cycles are insisting on a pretty strong and persistent ridging pattern setting up along the U.S. east coast around 9/15, which, if accurate, would be a major pattern change. This means that a slower, more easterly position of 95L vs. the last two gfs runs may mean it would actually miss that trough that takes it well east of the US and get trapped underneath the building ridge around midmonth. IF that were to occur, 95L would likely make a move toward FL or some other portion of the SE US soon afterward. So, this is why what appear to be too far west gfs initializations may mean that the latest 95L recurves on the gfs may verify to be incorrect.
Excellent post. I mentioned this earlier in the models thread as well (comparing the GFS/Euro 00z runs).
I've been comparing the GFS/Euro 00z model runs and through 96 hours the overall upper air pattern is quite similar. It appears the major difference is the initialization point. The GFS initializes the LLC on the northwestern side of the convection, whereas the Euro initializes the LLC on the southeastern side of the convection. Given the current satellite presentation, NHC/NRL coordinates, and the 850mb vorticity chart, the Euro initialization point appears more accurate.