So...you think Hillary would make a good President??

[j]

THIS WILL OPEN YOUR EYES. By Paul Harvey -

Conveniently Forgotten Facts

Back in 1969 a group of Black Panthers decided that a fellow black
panther named... Alex Rackley needed to die. Rackley was suspected of
disloyalty. Rackley was first tied to a chair. Once safely immobilized, his friends tortured him for hours by, among other things, pouring boiling water on him. When they got tired of torturing Rackley, Black Panther member, Warren Kimbo took Rackley outside and put a bullet in his head. Rackley's body was later found floating in a river about 25 miles north of New Haven, Conn.

Perhaps at this point you're curious as to what happened to these Black
Panthers.

In 1977, that's only eight years later, only one of the killers was still
in jail. The shooter, Warren Kimbro, managed to get a scholarship to
Harvard and became good friends with none other than Al Gore. He later
became an assistant dean at Eastern Connecticut State College. Isn't
that something? As a '60s radical you can pump a bullet into someone's head, and a few years later, in the same state, you can become an assistant college dean!

Only in America!

Erica Huggins was the lady who served the Panthers by boiling the water
for Mr. Rackley's torture. Some years later Ms. Huggins was elected to a
California School Board.

How in the world do you think these killers got off so easy? Maybe it was
in some part due to the efforts of two people who came to the defense
of the Panthers. These two people actually went so far as to shut down
Yale University with demonstrations in defense of the accused Black Panthers during their trial. One of these people was none other than Bill Lan Lee. Mr. Lee, or Mr. Lan Lee, as the case may be, isn't a college dean. He isn't a member of a California School Board. He is now head of the US Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, appointed by none other than Bill Clinton.

O.K., so who was the other Panther defender? Is this other notable Panther defender now a school board member? Is this other Panther apologist now an assistant college dean? No, neither!

The other Panther defender was, like Lee, a radical law student at Yale
University at the time. She is now known as The "smartest woman in the
world "

She is none other than the Democratic senator from the State of New
York----our former First Lady, the incredible Hillary Rodham Clinton.

And now, as Paul Harvey said; You know "the rest of the story."

Pass this on! This deserves the widest possible press. Also remember
it, if and when she runs for President.

[streetsoldier]

Hillary Rodham, in 1969 a senior at Swarthmore, was interviewed in TIME Magazine as one of America's top female graduates; even then, she presented a basic outline of what she intended to accomplish through making law by court decision, rather than through the electoral process (which she did as a Legal Aid Society staffer and, later, attorney).

As we have seen over the last 33 years, many laws which would not stand the test of the polling booth have been issued from "benches" all acrosss the land.

Yesterday's radicals have become today's academic and entertainment "Establishment", having learned to skew the system to their own agendae by (a) championing causes celebres in the arts, in Hollywood and through "public", or educational broadcasting, and (b) by using our courts to hand down laws "we, the people" would never have accepted if offered on a ballot.

Do the math, ladies and gentlemen...and remember that Hillary's grand vision for her version of a future America can be found within the text of Aldous Huxley's book Brave New World, admittedly so by Hillary herself.

Be afraid...be VERY afraid.

[GalvestonDuck]

I'll kill myself if she gets elected.

[JCT777]

Just another reason why I think Hillary stands no chance to be elected as president.

[JetMaxx]

The thought of Hillary Rodham Clinton...or anyone with her same political philosophy and lack of conscience being elected President -- just the thought of it chills me to the bone :o :o :o :o :o

[Lindaloo]

I'll kill myself if she gets elected.

Well, I doubt she will ever get elected. So, you are safe from that. lol.

[GalvestonDuck]

LOL, so true, Linda.

However, the skeptic in me came out and I had to look this up: http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/outrage/panthers.htm

But do I care? It's *gag*Hillary. Still don't want her as president.

[Lindaloo]

WOW!! It is false? lol. I read that with my mouth open when j first posted this one. But nope, even though it is false, I do not want her for President either.

[j]

I didn't check this out I admit because I just assume anything immoral,corrupt, or of questionable behavior is a sure bet when digging into her past (or present for that matter).

[Lindaloo]

I didn't check this out I admit because I just assume anything immoral,corrupt, or of questionable behavior is a sure bet when digging into her past (or present for that matter).

[Guest]

I didn't check this out I admit because I just assume anything immoral,corrupt, or of questionable behavior is a sure bet when digging into her past (or present for that matter).

LOL

[streetsoldier]

Well, I did check out my sources in the post I left...and it still rings true.

The "smartest woman in America"? Perhaps, in a very twisted, perverse way, but IMNSHO she is the "most dangerous woman in America", and deserves no chance to further her ambition at the cost of our freedoms, institutions and culture. And that's the rest of MY story.

[Rainband]

I didn't check this out I admit because I just assume anything immoral,corrupt, or of questionable behavior is a sure bet when digging into her past (or present for that matter).

shows how little you know

[wx247]

My,my,my! I would just like to ask a question. This question is not meant to be rude, but to get information on how some of you feel the way you feel. Why would this story give credence to not electing Hillary and how does that differ from things that others do in the past that doesn't affect your opinion of them?

Again... this is not meant to sound rude, I am just curious as to how each person decides these issues. It will help me for a class in ethics I am in this semester.

[streetsoldier]

Well, I'm a fairly simple "read"; a socio-political mix of libertarian/conservative, I possess a healthy distrust of increased centralization of power into Washington, and/or with the result of making the 50 "sovereign States" in the Federal Union little more than administrative arms thereof.

I also jealously guard my personal liberties, and unless national security necessitates, those are otherwise inviolable in my eyes. However, I fear that even well-meaning legislation in the wrong hands can be of immeasurable damage to my liberties, and those of all citizens.

Take Homeland Security...necessary for combatting terror threats, yes, BUT...in the hands of such as Hillary Rodham Clinton (remember Waco and Ruby Ridge?), the agency can be expanded to include anyone who does NOT "buy her act"...as we have seen before during her husband's Administration (with Hillary's "Kitchen Cabinet" pulling the strings).

Now, then...Government on the Federal level is restricted by the Constitution to three basic functions, and these are (a) administration of justice, (b) provision for natiional defense, and (c) preservation of internal order. ALL OTHER POWERS belong to the States (collective) or the people (individuals). Period.

As anyone can see, Hillary's "it takes a village" approach (read = centralization into a "maternalistic" power structure, with her at the helm), is diametrically opposite my own.

Does that help you?

[wx247]

Yes Streetsoldier. Thanks!

[coriolis]

I surely would not want Hillary to be president. I just don't like her. I think that she's on a huge ego trip.

[streetsoldier]

Nah, Hillary suffers from what most "upper-level liberals" do...a peculiar malaise that manifests itself in the idea that only THEY know what's best for us (collective thinking...the individual doesn't count, unless he/she is elevated to their lofty rank).

Such as these pander to the "common man" in promoting the fallacy that only Government (meaning them) can solve their problems.

We are all familiar with John F. Kennedy's dictum, "Ask not...what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country (read: big government)."

As a dedicated libertarian/conservative, I'd rephrase this..."Ask not...what your country can do for you; ask what YOU CAN DO FOR YOURSELF." This places the burden of responsibility squarely where it should belong...with the individual citizen, and his/her abilities and strengths, to go about their business, free of unwarranted Governmental interference, while at the same time respecting the rights of those around them VOLUNTARILY.

Not that those truly in need should be ignored, shunted aside...no, not at all. But, to be honest, we have an "entitlement mentality" in America which serves no purpose than to actually keep the recipients down and dependent, while empowering those who claim to champion their plight.

OK, that was my "Millennium Minute plus three"...but I hope you see where Hillary fits into the pattern. And it isn't a pretty picture.