brunota2003 wrote:The NHC bit on one solution, and the other turned out to be closer to the truth. The cone represents where the center will be 66% of the time. The other 34% of the time the center goes out of the cone. Obviously, though, that 34% is usually further along the track (Day 4 or 5) than this time's.
so there is absolutely no confusion to all the folks on the board, bottom line is that the NHC CONE its all about statistics...if you see a cone or track or anything else from anywhere other than nhc i recommend you do your homework and determine the derivation of such so that you are keenly aware of exactly what you are looking at so you can be informed properly....that doesn't mean nhc is the only one with a brain or is always correct as we have seen the last few days they bit like most others and were wrong, it just means there are many different flavors out there so know what you are consuming.
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutcone.shtmlDefinition of the NHC Track Forecast Cone
Definition:
The cone represents the probable track of the center of a tropical cyclone, and is formed by enclosing the area swept out by a set of circles (not shown) along the forecast track (at 12, 24, 36 hours, etc). The size of each circle is set so that two-thirds of historical official forecast errors over a 5-year sample fall within the circle. The circle radii defining the cones in 2011 for the Atlantic and eastern North Pacific basins are given in the table below.
One can also examine historical tracks to determine how often the entire 5-day path of a cyclone remains completely within the area of the cone. This is a different perspective that ignores most timing errors. For example, a storm moving very slowly but in the expected direction would still be within the area of the cone, even though the track forecast error could be very large. Based on forecasts over the previous 5 years, the entire track of the tropical cyclone can be expected to remain within the cone roughly 60-70% of the time.