The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
First, I know I have been away forever, but now that there is finally something that might generate rain in parched South Florida, I will pipe up.
For the past few days, I have been highly skeptical as to the development of this low. In large part, much of this was due to the large upper-level low (TUTT), currently near 27°N 45°W, whose axis the GFS and its ensembles in particular show digging at least 3° farther south over the next three days. The GFS models have generally handled well the highly retrogressive, split-flow jet pattern that has dominated the Northwestern Hemisphere for the past several weeks. I have given these models more weight than the ECMWF, which shows, and has been showing consistently, a weaker TUTT and, within the first 60 hours, a stronger 99L, which it takes through Puerto Rico in about three days. While the cloud pattern of the system itself has become much better organized, and the low-level inflow/circulation more vigorous and tighter, in the last 24 hours, satellite overlays show that there is a very narrow slot of light net shear (15-kt low-level winds, 20-kt mid-level, 25-kt upper-level currently) over the system, and that much stronger vertical shear over 50 knots exists barely 2° north of the developing low-level center, which seems to be near 13°N 58°W at this time. Unless the 24-hour movement near 280° (WNW) changes, the system will be encountering much stronger shear in a little over 24 hours. Compared to its appearance overnight, the developing center appears much more exposed due to westerly shear on the north side of the system (note the contrast to the strong convection south of the center of circulation).
I briefly examined available climatology concerning systems that formed between August 1—15 within 90 n mi of the current position. For seasons with weak El Niño present by mid-August, as the current Pacific warming is on track to be, out of about 10 samples, I could not find any system on the current trajectory that developed, save Dennis of 1981, which went on to hit South Florida. Given the likelihood that shear will halt further substantial organization and result in an exposed center in about 24 hours, and given the strong ridge building in two days afterward, such a northward track seems unlikely. So that leaves no possible precedent for a TC in this area, at this time and in this type of season...and none for this type of system in a season that saw significant early-season, generally northward-tracking development outside of the deep tropics, as was witnessed earlier this year due to Alberto, Beryl, Chris, and Debby. Given the strong basis in climatology against both a northward track and any real development, the intensity models that take the system to hurricane intensity seem dubious, especially since they have had a stronger bias in the short term, just as the ECMWF and non-GFS models have consistently shown a northward bias with respect to the track over the past few days.
In short, I expect a maximum intensity of no more than 35 kt/40 mph and a track through the northern Windward Islands as a weak tropical storm in 48 hours. Thereafter, a track north of the latitude of Kingston, Jamaica, is not to be expected.