Hybridstorm_November2001 wrote:
This certainly could be a disaster in the making, if it verifies.
Lets hope not !!! Could be a monster in disguise !! Ivan all over again !!
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Hybridstorm_November2001 wrote:
This certainly could be a disaster in the making, if it verifies.
perk wrote:Is anybody other than me surprised that the NHC didn't shift the track a little southward?
randge wrote:This is a great place to see what a lot of knowlegeable people think about these systems. Unfortunately in replying to an individual poster you get a quote box that includes all the stuff in the individual post including graphics. That means, as you see above, the same Weather Underground map appears four times. That's unnecessary and annoying when things get busy (and begin to affect folk's vital interests).
We should be judicious when replying to posts - especially when we get storms cranking up and heading for populated areas.
Stormlover2012 wrote:gfdl might get it right but it till be cen tex so sw la if it gets it right
HurricaneAndrew92 wrote:hurricanes1234 wrote:What is really going on with this storm? Look at the impressive appearance on satellite imagery and that is how strong it is?! That has to be the weakest storm with that well-organized structure I have ever seen!
It could be still 60mph, still haven't sampled the eastern side, thats where the winds and moist air are. Check back in 2hours and 30mins should be upgraded if this is true.
wxman57 wrote:Just because the GFDL got one right 7 years ago doesn't mean it should be trusted. I certainly don't pay much attention to it. And, unfortunately, the new and improved hurricane model (HWRF) isn't proving to be any better. I'm still thinking Mexico (twice)
hurricanes1234 wrote:HurricaneAndrew92 wrote:hurricanes1234 wrote:What is really going on with this storm? Look at the impressive appearance on satellite imagery and that is how strong it is?! That has to be the weakest storm with that well-organized structure I have ever seen!
It could be still 60mph, still haven't sampled the eastern side, thats where the winds and moist air are. Check back in 2hours and 30mins should be upgraded if this is true.
Thanks....my comment was slightly aggressive because of how stunned I was when I saw that Ernesto was only 50 mph. Sorry if I offended anyone.
wxman57 wrote:Just because the GFDL got one right 7 years ago doesn't mean it should be trusted. I certainly don't pay much attention to it. And, unfortunately, the new and improved hurricane model (HWRF) isn't proving to be any better. I'm still thinking Mexico (twice).
No reason to get excited. The plane is finding that Ernesto is barely a TS, despite its appearance on satellite. Surface obs (buoy to the north) and recon don't lie. Satellite can be VERY deceiving when trying to estimate surface conditions in the tropics. Clearly, Ernesto is struggling as the models had forecast. Low-level convergence appears to be lacking
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests