ATL: HELENE - Post-Tropical

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L

#401 Postby ozonepete » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:43 pm

ROCK wrote:I am not to sure I would just brush this guy off as a CA / Yucatan storm just yet....None of the models have a handle on 92L. Nor do they have a handle on this big bad trof that is supposed to swing down next week....for instance... The GFDL doesnt even see it, GFS doesnt do anything with it, CMC keeps it weak, NOGAPS over does it and sends it to fish la la land. IN other words, we are talking 6-7 days and it needs to be watched by everyone....Islanders are first up...


Yeah don't count me in the camp who's thinks it's going the same route as Ernesto. Although I said wxman's early analysis for track is reasonable today, it might not be so reasonable tomorrow, lol. We all know how much the track can change that far out. It's just way too early to say.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L

#402 Postby wxman57 » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:44 pm

Low-level center appears to be pulling ahead of that convective burst again, by about 40 miles. No one said it's 100% going to hit CA or the southern Yucatan. But all models do develop a ridge right over the eastern Gulf and Florida by next Tuesday when it would be reaching the western Caribbean, indicating continued west motion.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#403 Postby Blown Away » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:45 pm

Image
18z dynamic models.
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
Nikki
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 291
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:38 pm
Location: Santa Fe, TX (yes I typed that right TEXAS not New Mexico, I am about 20 miles from Galveston, TX)

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L

#404 Postby Nikki » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:45 pm

wxman57 wrote:Low-level center appears to be pulling ahead of that convective burst again, by about 40 miles. No one said it's 100% going to hit CA or the southern Yucatan. But all models do develop a ridge right over the eastern Gulf and Florida by next Tuesday when it would be reaching the western Caribbean, indicating continued west motion.



Would the continued west motion send it into either CA or southern Yucatan vs. into the GOM? Wouldn't it have to move WNW at some point to make it into the GOM?
0 likes   
My name is Nicole and this is what I go by in Storm2k chat! Come chat with us! We have fun in there too!!

A teacher's purpose is not to create students in her own image, but to develop students who can create their own image. ~Author Unknown

Alicia, Allison, Rita, Ike

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L

#405 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:47 pm

wxman57 wrote:Low-level center appears to be pulling ahead of that convective burst again, by about 40 miles. No one said it's 100% going to hit CA or the southern Yucatan. But all models do develop a ridge right over the eastern Gulf and Florida by next Tuesday when it would be reaching the western Caribbean, indicating continued west motion.


I see the far western edge of the circ but within the first burst there are now over shooting tops indicating a possible larger convective burst to come as well as the western sides low level cloud deck is finally starting to thicken a sign it to is probably about develop convection
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Weatherfreak000

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L

#406 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:48 pm

This storm is THAT way away and you guys are already forecasting a track???? That's crazytalk and any vet here at storm2k knows it. Ernesto could have been an entirely different storm, and these preliminary models do NOT look the same as his....why do you ask? My thoughts are.....

-Slower movement
-Further North
-More organized LLC
-Vastly better conditions in the Central Caribbean


In closing, all wxman57 is saying is given the right circumstances it CAN take an Ernie track, but the puzzle pieces are in place to send Gordon to the GOM so long as he doesn't collapse like Ernie did trekking west......I just don't see it. Also appears to be a smaller circulation, this potentially has an effect on track as well.
Last edited by Portastorm on Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Fixed reference to wxman57 tag
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145309
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L

#407 Postby cycloneye » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:52 pm

Well,maybe this time it will be upgraded? I prefer to wait for the official word by NHC between 4:30 PM-5:00 PM EDT. :)

BEGIN
NHC_ATCF
invest_RENUMBER_al922012_al072012.ren
FSTDA
R
U
040
010
0000
201208091948

NONE
NOTIFY=ATRP
[/size]

ftp://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/inves ... 072012.ren
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#408 Postby KWT » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:55 pm

I tend to think its quite logical that if a storm follow almost directly after another in a similar location with similar background conditions and problems, the track probably won't be too much different at least to start with. Of course it could change tohugh as we get deeper into the period.

Just remember that models do tend to under-estimate ridging, especially in the mid ranges.

As for the center, I do see the western side poking out more, but I don't think its outrunning the convection just yet really, however if the LL flow does pick up any more then its going to have a hard time to keep up.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145309
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#409 Postby cycloneye » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:58 pm

091953
CHGHUR
TROPICAL CYCLONE GUIDANCE MESSAGE
NWS NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
1953 UTC THU AUG 9 2012

DISCLAIMER...NUMERICAL MODELS ARE SUBJECT TO LARGE ERRORS.
PLEASE REFER TO NHC OFFICIAL FORECASTS FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE
AND SUBTROPICAL CYCLONE INFORMATION.

ATLANTIC OBJECTIVE AIDS FOR

DISTURBANCE SEVEN (AL072012) 20120809 1800 UTC

...00 HRS... ...12 HRS... ...24 HRS. .. ...36 HRS...
120809 1800 120810 0600 120810 1800 120811 0600

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 13.7N 42.9W 13.7N 46.5W 13.9N 50.5W 14.2N 54.6W
BAMD 13.7N 42.9W 13.7N 45.5W 13.8N 48.0W 14.2N 50.4W
BAMM 13.7N 42.9W 13.9N 45.7W 14.2N 48.7W 14.6N 51.6W
LBAR 13.7N 42.9W 13.6N 45.6W 13.7N 48.8W 14.0N 51.9W
SHIP 30KTS 36KTS 43KTS 49KTS
DSHP 30KTS 36KTS 43KTS 49KTS

...48 HRS... ...72 HRS... ...96 HRS. .. ..120 HRS...
120811 1800 120812 1800 120813 1800 120814 1800

LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON LAT LON
BAMS 14.7N 58.9W 15.3N 67.6W 16.2N 76.6W 16.5N 84.3W
BAMD 14.8N 52.5W 16.6N 55.7W 18.0N 58.4W 19.3N 61.4W
BAMM 15.2N 54.3W 16.4N 59.0W 17.9N 62.6W 19.4N 65.6W
LBAR 14.5N 54.9W 16.3N 59.8W 18.3N 62.6W 19.3N 64.3W
SHIP 55KTS 59KTS 61KTS 65KTS
DSHP 55KTS 59KTS 61KTS 65KTS

...INITIAL CONDITIONS...
LATCUR = 13.7N LONCUR = 42.9W DIRCUR = 270DEG SPDCUR = 13KT
LATM12 = 13.9N LONM12 = 40.0W DIRM12 = 263DEG SPDM12 = 16KT
LATM24 = 14.1N LONM24 = 37.0W
WNDCUR = 30KT RMAXWD = 40NM WNDM12 = 25KT
CENPRS = 1010MB OUTPRS = 1013MB OUTRAD = 150NM SDEPTH = M
RD34NE = 0NM RD34SE = 0NM RD34SW = 0NM RD34NW = 0NM
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L

#410 Postby drezee » Thu Aug 09, 2012 2:59 pm

cycloneye wrote:Well,maybe this time it will be upgraded? I prefer to wait for the official word by NHC between 4:30 PM-5:00 PM EDT. :)



Well you know what GW said...

Fool me once...uhhhh...you can't fool me again

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bushism

It meets all criteria for a TC. It is basically subjective at this point.
Last edited by drezee on Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#411 Postby KWT » Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:00 pm

Wonder if the latest convective burst was finally good enough for the NHC to pull the trigger for the next set of advisories. We'll know soon enough!
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L

#412 Postby ConvergenceZone » Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:00 pm

tgenius wrote:Is this going to be something to worry about in FL or is this going to end up being a bigger concern for the Gulf?



as wxman said, it SHOULD BE going to either Mexico or Central America. Nothing to worry about unless something drastically changes....WXMAN has a pretty good track record ...

Edit: I tried to delete my post as I realized it was outdated, but I hit "report" instead, so I reported myself lol....
Last edited by ConvergenceZone on Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#413 Postby gatorcane » Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:02 pm

Looks like the WSW motion has stopped and it is now moving due west. May not lose any more lattitude from here:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/tatl/loop-vis.html
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145309
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L

#414 Postby cycloneye » Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:03 pm

Updated 18z Best Track

I think this time is for real.

AL, 07, 2012080918, , BEST, 0, 137N, 429W, 30, 1010, TD

ftp://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/inves ... 012.invest
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

#415 Postby Nimbus » Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:06 pm

A Ridge forecast over the southeast when G/92 is expected to be in the Caribbean, so strength might be more of a determining factor. Even something like a stall trying to recurve into the ridge could mess up all the models timing. Its only moving 15 MPH now so it wouldn't take much to have it spin up into the big islands.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#416 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:06 pm

that was kind of silly. they should have just left from this morning. lol
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re:

#417 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:09 pm

KWT wrote:I tend to think its quite logical that if a storm follow almost directly after another in a similar location with similar background conditions and problems, the track probably won't be too much different at least to start with. Of course it could change tohugh as we get deeper into the period.

Just remember that models do tend to under-estimate ridging, especially in the mid ranges.

As for the center, I do see the western side poking out more, but I don't think its outrunning the convection just yet really, however if the LL flow does pick up any more then its going to have a hard time to keep up.


Well not that its a huge deal. but if you go frame by frame you will see the convection never covered the western side. so its neither out running it or build western.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L

#418 Postby KWT » Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:10 pm

cycloneye wrote:Updated 18z Best Track

I think this time is for real.

AL, 07, 2012080918, , BEST, 0, 137N, 429W, 30, 1010, TD

ftp://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/atcf/tcweb/inves ... 012.invest


Yep looks like this time its the real deal. Also as mentioned earlier, heading due west now as well, wouldn't surprise me to see it soon pick up an ever so slight north of west motion, say 275.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#419 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:13 pm

it looks as though this buoy will take a direct pass over. should give accurate reading of winds and pressure.

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... _floater_2
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
TropicalAnalystwx13
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Age: 27
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

#420 Postby TropicalAnalystwx13 » Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:19 pm

It is too early to accurately and professionally say where Seven is going.
0 likes   


Return to “2012”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests