Isn't the rule if your in the 5 day cone at day 5 your not going to get hit.
Thats what i have always heard too, i will give it another day or so before i get to concerned
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Isn't the rule if your in the 5 day cone at day 5 your not going to get hit.
SeminoleWind wrote:Isn't the rule if your in the 5 day cone at day 5 your not going to get hit.
Thats what i have always heard too, i will give it another day or so before i get to concerned
tcast305 wrote:SeminoleWind wrote:Anyone think this will get renumbered by 5AM or even 8?
If it would it would be at 5am or 11am unless a special advisement.
t has be a TD/TS for some time, guessing that NHC is waiting for more sustained convection and that's what we are now getting.
boca wrote:tcast305 wrote:SeminoleWind wrote:Anyone think this will get renumbered by 5AM or even 8?
If it would it would be at 5am or 11am unless a special advisement.
Its very hard to tell if it will be at 5am or 11am its so large and it has to consolidate which its trying to do but its hauling west so fast its taking its sweet time.
Technically speaking, a cap(ping layer) is an temperature inversion; precipitable water ("moisture") isn't part of the equation.tolakram wrote:I'm not understanding a lot of what you're saying, so let me respectfully ponder some of your theories.Shuriken wrote:Correct....although a "hot tower" refers to a CB while "meatball" is a color infrared depiction of anvil top blow-off.islandgirl45 wrote:Ah, so like a "cap" that inhibits convection from growing. And "meatballs" must be the same thing as "hot towers?"
I'm not a fan of "hot tower" usage, btw; "popping" CBs near the center of an LLC aren't always or even usually in a better moisture plume (i.e., higher atmospheric heat content); they're simply located in the area where the top of the atmosphere ("King Cap") is unraveling. IOW, newly rambunctious CBs are the result of a changing condition, not the cause of it.
Cap usually refers to a temperature or moisture difference that caps the atmosphere. In this case the dry air being entrained into the system might be considered the cap.
It's not the latitude, but rather how warm the overall atmospheric column is (so it's thick at the equator because it's warm there).As far as I understand it the height of storms in the tropics has everything to do with latitude rather than a special feature of tropical storms.
A hot tower (if I may define it as a "CB exhausting at 200mb") exists in the first place because the high altitude cap gave way; the entrainment of (some) dry air into the circulation will mostly just degrade accessory convection at the periphery. The problem (from an analysis/study standpoint) is that there isn't enough recognition of the critical role the 200mb cap plays, leading to IMO over-emphasis on lower atmospheric factors (shear, dry air, etc) of IMO lesser importance.....In any case the research points to hot towers providing a buffer to the dry air.
Velocity in and of itself is not an inhibitor -- it's just that a system is likely to be moving fast due to some other atmospheric condition which is more often than not hostile to tropical formation (such as an easterly surge off the Sahara).numerous pro mets, but not the NHC that I can recall, have commented on the forward speed of the low level circulation being a hindrance to development. I don't think it was a coincidence that Ernesto finally developed after the forward speed slowed, but I can't find anything to either support or refute this.
Riptide wrote:SeminoleWind wrote:Anyone think this will get renumbered by 5AM or even 8?
*image removed*
It has been a TD/TS for some time, guessing that NHC is waiting for more sustained convection and that's what we are now getting.
CrazyC83 wrote:Recon is still a go for this afternoon? That would be the tell-tale sign IMO.
AL, 94, 2012082106, , BEST, 0, 152N, 503W, 30, 1007, LO, 34, NEQ, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1013, 250, 35, 0, 0, L, 0, , 0, 0, INVEST, M,
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests