ATL: ISAAC - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 4:04 pm
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
It appears that there is an ULL sitting just north of the Yucatan right now. I believe this is what is pulling the MLC and ULC away from the surface low.
0 likes
- cheezyWXguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 6108
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re:
fasterdisaster wrote:This storm is so bizarre. An eye seems to forming on that RBTOP, WAY to the north of the LLC.
Not quite, its an overshooting cloud top. Oftentimes they do show up with a little indentation surrounding them, but this storm has a while before we really see an eye feature start showing up.
0 likes
- Hurricaneman
- Category 5
- Posts: 7351
- Age: 45
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
- Location: central florida
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
I have a question, is it possible that recon has been following the wrong area the last few hours or is this really a severely decoupled storm
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:11 pm
- Location: Southport, NC
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
kat61 wrote:WilmingtonSandbar wrote:tolakram wrote:Ok, we need to change the subject to something more constructive. To many frayed nerves here.
Mark, I understand your demand to get back to something more constructive, but I think this line of conversation has been building most of the day, and in the wee hours of the night might be the best time to have it. We know that mainly the serious members are the ones here now watching the model runs and all.
Are you a Pro Met?
Me? No, and I have never claimed to be. I learn something new everyday on here.

There is a Pro-met from our area on here though. I don't know his real name, so I don't know if he is on the air or which channel.
Last edited by WilmingtonSandbar on Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Diana X2 (look it up), Bertha, Fran, Bonnie, Floyd, Dennis, Charley, Ophelia, Ernesto, Irene, Matthew, And Florence
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
crimi481 wrote:Yes - the N.E Bands have been shredding off to the N.NE all day/night
Decoupling - big wedge of dry air across state= from Sarasota south to Ft Meyes
Something pullig on hose ands -from N.E
http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/geo/index ... thod=flash
If the pulling action stops =from storms N..E - may cause Isaac to slow/stall befoe landfall. What could pick it up to N. coast?
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 194
- Age: 37
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 10:05 pm
- Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
bayoubebe wrote:BlueIce wrote:The newest RBTOP product seems to show what everyone has been hinting at for the last couple of hours.
[[/img]
Meaning what exactly??
I'm not too proud to admit, I have no idea what you are referring to.
Please spell it out to us nonprofessionals/nonweather educated members.
Basically that the storm appears to be strengthing north of the upper level low and the mid level convection is still expanding based on the radar imagery. It's going to take a couple of hours to figure out what is in store for this system.
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Hurricaneman wrote:I have a question, is it possible that recon has been following the wrong area the last few hours or is this really a severely decoupled storm
They flew through the area at 850...and found strong NE winds. So far as we can tell...the 850 and sfc are still stacked. It's the mid-level that's taking off.
0 likes
- tropicwatch
- Category 5
- Posts: 3391
- Age: 61
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
- Location: Panama City Florida
- Contact:
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
DukeDevil91 wrote:It appears that there is an ULL sitting just north of the Yucatan right now. I believe this is what is pulling the MLC and ULC away from the surface low.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes
Tropicwatch
Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'
Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
- Location: Miami, Florida
Re: Re:
cheezyWXguy wrote:fasterdisaster wrote:This storm is so bizarre. An eye seems to forming on that RBTOP, WAY to the north of the LLC.
Not quite, its an overshooting cloud top. Oftentimes they do show up with a little indentation surrounding them, but this storm has a while before we really see an eye feature start showing up.
Thanks, I sometimes get fooled by those.
0 likes
- vbhoutex
- Storm2k Executive
- Posts: 29113
- Age: 73
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
- Location: Cypress, TX
- Contact:
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
BlueIce wrote:Meteorcane wrote:Is that convective feature S-SW of Isaac and outflow boundary or a curved band?
The Weather channel just stipulated that it's either something similar to a gust front (think collapsing thunderstorm on radar) or high cirrus.
I would go with high cirrus, if I was given a choice. I don't see any evidence of out flow boundaries.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Air Force Met wrote:Hurricaneman wrote:I have a question, is it possible that recon has been following the wrong area the last few hours or is this really a severely decoupled storm
They flew through the area at 850...and found strong NE winds. So far as we can tell...the 850 and sfc are still stacked. It's the mid-level that's taking off.
What do you think about buoy 42023? and what recon just did. hard left turn winds no longer point the old llc being down where it was.
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
- TwisterFanatic
- Category 5
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
- Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma
Yea, I don't think those are outflow boundaries.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
- Location: Miami, Florida
Anyone think the CDO is expanding closer to the LLC in the last frame here?
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 1243
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:45 am
- Location: Ft. Collins, CO
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Air Force Met wrote:Hurricaneman wrote:I have a question, is it possible that recon has been following the wrong area the last few hours or is this really a severely decoupled storm
They flew through the area at 850...and found strong NE winds. So far as we can tell...the 850 and sfc are still stacked. It's the mid-level that's taking off.
Little bit of southerly shear I suppose. Never good to have an ULL to your west if you're a TC.
0 likes
- Hurricaneman
- Category 5
- Posts: 7351
- Age: 45
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
- Location: central florida
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
recon is heading for the MLC, people may be suprised what they find
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes
- tropicwatch
- Category 5
- Posts: 3391
- Age: 61
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
- Location: Panama City Florida
- Contact:
The next advisory could be quite interesting.
0 likes
Tropicwatch
Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'
Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
BlueIce wrote:The newest RBTOP product seems to show what everyone has been hinting at for the last couple of hours.
Just for the record, is RBTOP really a new product? The image says IR Ch. 4, which is the traditional longwave IR channel (wavelength of 10.7 micrometers). Unless I'm mistaken, the "RBTOP" is really just an image of the same longwave infrared channel but with a different color-table. On the satellite floater page, there are several different color-tables available. So, the actual data are the exact same as those shown using the AVN color-table, for example, but the colors associated with the data are different. The color table may or may not make a particular feature easier to see... In this case, I think it does make it easier to see, largely because it has many more colors than most of the other IR color-scales (note how the transition from one shade of a color to another is very smooth using the RBTOP color-table).

0 likes
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
- Meteorcane
- Category 2
- Posts: 559
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2011 6:49 am
- Location: North Platte Nebraska
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion
Quick question how do the Wisconsin charts measure Vorticity. I know that when given wind components and horizontal spacing Vorticity is dv/dx - du/dy, my question is how do they get there wind components to plug into that equation? Remote measurements, surface measurements, UA measurements, interpolation? I ask because I want to know just how accurate these charts are for vorticity (especially UL vorticity)
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest