
http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ge ... =spect.pal
Check this loop, I'll post the latest image in just a minute. The core of Isaac is in really bad shape right now, and recon reported a poorly defined eye.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
rockyman wrote:If (big if) the dark spot on this satellite loop is the eye, Isaac is well north of its NHC forecast track (click the Fsct Pts box):
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html
ColdFusion wrote:You are not kidding! If that is, its practically at the latitude its supposed to be at tomorrow! Wouldnt that mean a way different impact than what is being reported on NOLA news right now?rockyman wrote:If (big if) the dark spot on this satellite loop is the eye, Isaac is well north of its NHC forecast track (click the Fsct Pts box):
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html
mesoclone wrote:Is the dry air that Isaac is pulling in from the south the biggest factor in impeding its development?
mesoclone wrote:Is the dry air that Isaac is pulling in from the south the biggest factor in impeding its development?
mesoclone wrote:Ok, so I have been a member for 10 years with probably less than 20 posts cause most of my questions are answered by other members. But I forgot my username and such so I'll start over not a big deal. Anyways I was wondering how the diurnal cycle will effect this storm. Will the decrease in atmospheric temps. but stable oceanic temps. cause Isaac to gain strength? How does this work? Mind you I am a novice at this.
locke wrote:Just out of curiosity. Are people questioning the accuracy of NHC's storm surge predictions when complaining about any comparisons with Katrina?
I fully understand that in terms of virtually any measurement you care to look at there is simply no comparison between Katrina and Isaac (which has not yet even attained hurricance strength).
However, New Orleans vulnerability is and always has been storm surge. The storm surge maps for Isaac if accurate must be a cause for concern and as far as I can tell this was the comparison that was being made with Katrina. The highest recorded strom surge measurement in New Orleans from Katrina was 12 feet. Further East it was estimated to have exceeded 30 ft but New Orleans was spared the brunt of this.
The question then arises, if Isaac comes in at a slightly different angle with a maximum storm surge height in the 10-12ft range, is there any reason to believe, outside of any improvements to the levee system post Katrina, that the same result could not transpire. The storm surge prediction maps I see from NHC are certainly showing the potentital for a surge of that magnitude.
It pays to remember that it wasn't the wind and rain that caused the loss of life in New Orleans. It was the failure of the levee system in the face of a 12 ft storm surge.
Yep Isaac is no Katrina but its storm surge still is potentially quite dangerous for New Oreleans.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests