ATL: ISAAC - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#6661 Postby tailgater » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:52 pm

They might think it will be a low end Cat 2 because the pressure gradient will increase as that high builds back in, just me spitballing.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

nautical wheeler
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:13 pm

#6662 Postby nautical wheeler » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:53 pm

First time poster long time lurker. Amazing what I've learned on the site over the years - especially that there is quite an art to forecasting these things it seems. Some people have a better "sense" for the behavior and interactions of the atmosphere than others. I'm just your everyday weather buff who used to watch TWC for hours as a kid instead of cartoons. :lol:

Im from "that Land Mass between New Orleans and Mobile" as CNN continuously refers to Mississippi - yea that area that took the direct hit from Katrina.
:x

Anyway, it looks to me like Isaac is trying its best to fight the dry air as noted by the convection and moisture trying to wrap around, however there is one large pocket of particularly dry air in the NE quad that it needs to "flush out" before it can do any significant strengthening. Overall structure looks quite good beyond the dry air. If it can cycle that out and completely wrap around the center I could see a low end Cat. 2 right before landfall - as is forecast by the NHC - however it's certainly running out of time to do so.
0 likes   

ncweatherwizard
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1243
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:45 am
Location: Ft. Collins, CO

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#6663 Postby ncweatherwizard » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:54 pm

WxGuy1 wrote:Current IR satellite imagery continues to show relatively unimpressive structure. As we've seen through the past 36 hours, there is intense convection in only ~1/2 of the circulation. Yesterday, it's was primarily located in the northwestern 1/2 of the storm. This morning, most of the convection was "lop-sided" to the western 1/2 of the circulation. As of the latest image I've seen, nearly all of the precipitation is located in the southern semicircle. The upper-level anticyclone associated with Isaac is dislocated to the north of the center of circulation, resulting in some ~10 kt northeasterly shear over the center (and more over the western side of the storm). Although current precipitation water satellite data doesn't really suggest much in the way of dry air in the northern half of the storm, Isaac's appearance on satellite through the past couple of days certainly has shown signs of significant dry air entrainment.

So, the question is whether or not conditions will improve. Considering the warm water and "only" 10 kts of deep vertical wind shear, I would have expected to have seen appreciable intensification already if you had asked me a couple of days ago. However, the storm has looked "off" for the past few days, with strange wind structure as observed by recon (a few days ago, it was a very large area of weak winds near the center of circulation -- yesterday it was multiple eddies flying around). The structure of the winds around the circulation has improved and looks more "classic" now, but the lack of much convection in the northern semicircle doesn't bode well for significant intensification. I'm still waiting for the hammer to drop, so to say, and I'm waiting to see a symmetric blowup of convection around the center, but it's uncertain whether that will happen.

The longer Isaac stays in this 50-60 kt sfc peak wind state, the less time it has over water to intensify. Since I'd rather not see an intensifying hurricane slam into southeastern LA or coastal MS, this is probably a good thing. Landfall may not be that far off; each additional hour that recon flies through and sees only 55-60 kt surface winds is one less hour that intensification can occur. We can hope that Isaac maintains status quo of slow intensification and it makes landfall as a Cat 1. Considering the potentially "worst case scenario" track of putting New Orleans in the front right quad of the storm, this is much better than a major hurricane...


Plus, once this gets close to land, it's very likely that the eastern half of the cyclone will entrain dry continental air. It would not completely shock me if there are no measurements of sustained hurricane force winds anywhere when this thing makes landfall, even if it is classified as a hurricane at landfall (See Irene 2011 for an example).
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#6664 Postby SouthFloridawx » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:54 pm

timeflow wrote:Hey Kool Aid Man!
h0ttp://img16.imageshack.us/img16/5741/heykoolaidman.jpg
Uploaded with ImageShack.us


I know we aren't supposed to use one-liners, but that's pretty funny!
0 likes   

User avatar
EBrads146
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 10:21 am

#6665 Postby EBrads146 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:55 pm

11 PM stays at 70 mph
0 likes   

User avatar
PTPatrick
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1831
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:38 am

#6666 Postby PTPatrick » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:55 pm

Still a TS!
0 likes   

pwrdog
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 193
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 5:58 am
Location: Texas

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#6667 Postby pwrdog » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:55 pm

979mb still 70 mph..

It moved slightly more west than north 0.4 north & 0.5 west..
Last edited by pwrdog on Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#6668 Postby tailgater » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:56 pm

timeflow wrote:Hey Kool Aid Man!

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us


yeah the shrinks could use Isaac's IR pics instead of ink blots. :lol:
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

monicaei
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:58 pm

#6669 Postby monicaei » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:02 pm

What are y'all thoughts on Isaacs chances, realistically, of achieving hurricane status prior to landfall? Gotta say, he's an underachiever thus far, and I'm pretty thrilled about it!
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

#6670 Postby fasterdisaster » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:03 pm

I'm guessing they held back on upgrading because of the satellite presentation.
0 likes   

hurricanes1234
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2907
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:19 pm
Location: Trinidad and Tobago

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#6671 Postby hurricanes1234 » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:04 pm

Imagine this - Isaac is now more intense than Ernesto by 1 mbar and it hasn't even made it to hurricane strength yet. This storm will definitely go down in my book as one of the oddest storms I've tracked yet. And of course, it will be in the same list as Daniel from earlier this year! :)
0 likes   
PLEASE NOTE: With the exception of information from weather agencies that I may copy and paste here, my posts will NEVER be official, since I am NOT a meteorologist. They are solely my amateur opinion, and may or may not be accurate. Therefore, please DO NOT use them as official details, particularly when making important decisions. Thank you.

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re:

#6672 Postby tolakram » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:04 pm

fasterdisaster wrote:I'm guessing they held back on upgrading because of the satellite presentation.


I did not see any reliable surface wind measurements of hurricane strength or above. Did I miss one?
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

JamesCaneTracker
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 207
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:33 pm
Location: Portland, Maine

Re:

#6673 Postby JamesCaneTracker » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:05 pm

monicaei wrote:What are y'all thoughts on Isaacs chances, realistically, of achieving hurricane status prior to landfall? Gotta say, he's an underachiever thus far, and I'm pretty thrilled about it!


IMO when/if he goes he's going to do very quickly... If the winds ever decide to respond to the pressure he will most certainly become a cat 2 Hurricane or greater considering the pressure is already that of a cat 2 and still falling.

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#6674 Postby ROCK » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:05 pm

the center is probably migrating to the cold convection tops to the SW some....if that ever wrapped around it would probably shoot more north...I dont doubt the more west than north either....
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re:

#6675 Postby tolakram » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:06 pm

monicaei wrote:What are y'all thoughts on Isaacs chances, realistically, of achieving hurricane status prior to landfall? Gotta say, he's an underachiever thus far, and I'm pretty thrilled about it!


NHC predictions look good to me. I'm hoping it keeps having dry air issues all the way to the coast, but it must be watched since a lot of reliable guidance does show intensification just before landfall.

Image
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

Re:

#6676 Postby jasons2k » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:06 pm

monicaei wrote:What are y'all thoughts on Isaacs chances, realistically, of achieving hurricane status prior to landfall? Gotta say, he's an underachiever thus far, and I'm pretty thrilled about it!


The NHC says it will be, and it's always good to prepare for at least one category up. Especially in this case, the surge will be a problem. In the end, the story may be incredible flooding since it's such a slow mover.
0 likes   

rainstorm

Re:

#6677 Postby rainstorm » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:06 pm

monicaei wrote:What are y'all thoughts on Isaacs chances, realistically, of achieving hurricane status prior to landfall? Gotta say, he's an underachiever thus far, and I'm pretty thrilled about it!



pressurewise its already a low end cat2.

here is an interesting chart

http://www.weather.com/encyclopedia/cha ... scale.html

979 is a minimal cat2. if the winds catch up withthe pressure it will go up quickly.
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

Re: Re:

#6678 Postby fasterdisaster » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:07 pm

tolakram wrote:
fasterdisaster wrote:I'm guessing they held back on upgrading because of the satellite presentation.


I did not see any reliable surface wind measurements of hurricane strength or above. Did I miss one?


No, you're right. I should have clarified: the flight level winds combined with the lack of surface winds by themselves meant the NHC could go either way, but the satellite presentation is what convinces them (and me FWIW) that this is still a TS. That's all random conjecture of course.
0 likes   

rainstorm

#6679 Postby rainstorm » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:08 pm

i dont think 960 mb at landfall is out of the question now.
0 likes   

nautical wheeler
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:13 pm

#6680 Postby nautical wheeler » Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:08 pm

The moisture envelope around Isaac appears to be improving - the dry air slot is filling in. Better outflow on the southern side of the storm as well. Will Isaac respond though?
0 likes   


Return to “2012”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests