ATL: ISAAC - Recon Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- tropicwatch
- Category 5
- Posts: 3364
- Age: 61
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
- Location: Panama City Florida
- Contact:
- senorpepr
- Military Met/Moderator
- Posts: 12542
- Age: 42
- Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
- Location: Mackenbach, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Re:
Dave wrote:windnrain wrote:74kt flight level wind. Is it enough yet to justify hurricane intensity?
Flight level & pressure would be but the surface winds still aren't. See if the next flight out picks up anything + if they upgrade on the 11 pm adv.
Flight level winds would not support hurricane intensity. At 1500 m, you're looking at about a 80% reduction, so about 60 kt. Flight level winds and SFMR both only support 60 kt, thus the reason why NHC hasn't upgraded.
0 likes
- Dave
- Retired Staff
- Posts: 13442
- Age: 74
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:57 pm
- Location: Milan Indiana
- Contact:
Explanation of recon hdobs & reduction rates:
http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=85603
http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=85603
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 5075
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
- Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
- Contact:
Air Force
NOAA P-3
NOAA42: Is scheduled to fly into Isaac. Take off will be at 2000 UTC from Jacksonville International Airport and will recover at MacDill AFB. NOAA42 will fly a P-3 TDR/landfall mission. Three HRD scientists will be on this flight.
http://noaahrd.wordpress.com/2012/08/28 ... m-eastern/
Someone can pick up these missions later.
Code: Select all
A. 28/2100,29/0000,0300Z Fix Time (5PM, 8PM, 11PM EDT)
B. AFXXX 3209A ISAAC
C. 28/1930Z Departure Time (3:30PM EDT)
D. 29.0N 89.3W
E. 28/2030Z TO 29/0300Z Time on Station (4:30PM to 11PM EDT)
F. SFC TO 15,000 FT
NOAA P-3
Code: Select all
A. 29/0000Z Fix Time (8PM EDT)
B. NOAA2 3309A ISAAC
C. 28/2000Z Departure Time (4PM EDT)
D. 29.3N 89.6W
E. 28/2200Z TO 29/0200Z Time on Station (6PM to 10PM EDT)
F. SFC TO 15,000 FT
NOAA42: Is scheduled to fly into Isaac. Take off will be at 2000 UTC from Jacksonville International Airport and will recover at MacDill AFB. NOAA42 will fly a P-3 TDR/landfall mission. Three HRD scientists will be on this flight.
http://noaahrd.wordpress.com/2012/08/28 ... m-eastern/
Someone can pick up these missions later.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2263
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
- Location: Pensacola, Florida
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Recon Discussion
Our local weather guy here in Baton Rouge just said Recon picked up a pressure as low as 968 mb????
Have you guys seen that data anywhere?
Have you guys seen that data anywhere?
0 likes
- galaxy401
- Category 5
- Posts: 2410
- Age: 29
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:04 pm
- Location: Casa Grande, Arizona
Re:
BigB0882 wrote:Curious to see if this thing will fight to reach 80 MPH. That would be a victory with the trouble this has had!
It already did.

0 likes
Got my eyes on moving right into Hurricane Alley: Florida.
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Recon Discussion
Who else finds it interesting that they haven't moved the cone West any. Also they don't have it intensifying anymore than it already is at?
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2284
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
- Location: Baton Rouge, LA
- Contact:
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Recon Discussion
Blinhart wrote:Who else finds it interesting that they haven't moved the cone West any. Also they don't have it intensifying anymore than it already is at?
Probably because they see it continuing NW per Recon despite some models showing it moving West now or moving West for the past few hours. Those models can not verify if they are showing the movement already. The NAM in particular probably has zero weight with the NHC. I trust the NHC more than any model. As for strength, I think it could go up another 5-10 but at this point is that going to matter that much? I see no reason to wonder why they don't show it strengthening, if it doesn't stall then it will be on land quite soon.
0 likes
Re: ATL: ISAAC - Recon Discussion
I'll do as many as I can. May be in and out but I plan on being around most of the evening.
0 likes
can someone take over NOAA obs please.
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests