HurricaneAndrew92 wrote:It is a hurricane! My bad. I'm tired.
I think everyone who was tracking Isaac is tired.

Moderator: S2k Moderators
HurricaneAndrew92 wrote:It is a hurricane! My bad. I'm tired.
hurricanes1234 wrote:HurricaneAndrew92 wrote:It is a hurricane! My bad. I'm tired.
I think everyone who was tracking Isaac is tired.
Kingarabian wrote:
Cmon eye, CLEAR OUT.
hurricanes1234 wrote:Kingarabian wrote:
Cmon eye, CLEAR OUT.
Ileana resembles an annular hurricane slightly. Also, it shows the characteristics of some ePac storms - rounded and displaying a cloud-filled eye. So far, Ileana has been a good storm, becoming an 85 mph hurricane unexpectedly.
Yellow Evan wrote:hurricanes1234 wrote:Kingarabian wrote:
Cmon eye, CLEAR OUT.
Ileana resembles an annular hurricane slightly. Also, it shows the characteristics of some ePac storms - rounded and displaying a cloud-filled eye. So far, Ileana has been a good storm, becoming an 85 mph hurricane unexpectedly.
It becoming 85 mph was hardly unexpected. As for it being a good storms, hurricane like this happen ALL TH TIME. Check HURDAT if you don't believe me.
Kingarabian wrote:Hurricanes1234 -just for a future reference, EPac hurricanes almost never follow the NHC forecasts.
hurricanes1234 wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Hurricanes1234 -just for a future reference, EPac hurricanes almost never follow the NHC forecasts.
Even if they don't follow the forecasts, every storm is unique and deserves some form of recognition. We can't just blank the eastern Pacific out because the storms are not affecting land. A lot of people are doing just that, because 'it's far out to sea and not affecting anyone'.
You would not know how grateful I am to see a hurricane in this highly ignored basin - because a lot of people take them for granted. All they say is,"It's not a Category 5, so we're not bothering with it - it's a waste of time." or,"Ignore it - it is not affecting any landmasses." If I used to think that way about hurricanes, I would have never tracked a single one, because since I've started doing it, there haven't been any Category 5 storms. Yes, I would love to see a Category 5 that's not affecting anybody, but in my opinion, a storm is only an underachiever if it peaks below what the forecasts predicted, not if it doesn't become a Category 5. For example, Kirk is a strong Category 1 hurricane right now. Is it a Category 5 hurricane? No. But did it form out of a previously deteriorating area of low pressure? Yes. Is it a hurricane, which was not expected at all in the initial forecast? Yes. We cannot just throw the fish storms aside, or the storms below Category 5 status aside, because as I mentioned, every tropical cyclone, whether a Category 5 or not, needs recognition.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests