
what a beast...
CI# /Pressure/ Vmax
6.3 / 941.2mb/122.2kt
Final T# Adj T# Raw T#
6.3 6.5 6.5
Moderator: S2k Moderators
RSMC Warning #1 wrote:ANAIS INTENSIFIES GRADUALLY SINCE 00Z AND BECOMES THE HISTORICAL
EARLIER INTENSE TROPICAL CYCLONE OVER THE SOUTH WEST INDIAN OCEAN
Laplacian wrote:Forgive me, folks, because I'm relatively new here...I have a question to ask that's been bothering me. I see that people often post content that merely is a copy and paste of complete discussions from NHC, JTWC, etc. These copy-and-paste posts do not contain any analysis or insight from the person who posted.
Is the assumption here that there are people in this forum who are incapable of finding official discussions on the Web? If so, then my question is answered.
As a newcomer, I find such posts distracting. When I was teaching, I warned my students against the "diamond in the cow-dung heap" approach on exams. My warning was meant to discourage students from writing everything they knew about the topic associated with a specific exam question (these students expected me to go through all the text in order to find the nugget that perhaps answered the question).
I get the same feeling when I see an official discussion merely copied and pasted in a thread here. Wouldn't it be better just to copy and paste the relevant portion of a discussion and then comment about this relevant portion using individual insight and supporting images?
If I'm way out in left field on this one, I sincerely apologize. But I have to admit it's frustrating to see lines and lines and lines of copied and pasted text without any comment or insight. Again, I apologize if my observations as a newcomer are off base. All I'm saying is that it would be nice to see more posts with more focus. Thanks for understanding.
P.K. wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:This would be equivalent to a major hurricane in the Atlantic in April, correct?
Season starts on 1st Nov so this is more like a mid May system in the N Atl.
Cyclenall wrote:I was stunned when I saw Anais for the first time, looked immensely powerful for this time of year in the SIO. My estimate for strength is around 135 knots and no where close to what the other agencies are putting out (95-105 knots?). The eye is recent hours is almost totally clear and fairly warm looking (can't be totally sure because the products aren't great and the NRL isn't updating properly...newest full image is 2 hours old). Symmetry is close to that of a category 5 cyclone. Appears to be explosive deepening obviously that was totally missed by all accounts due to the simple fact this has never happened before in recorded history (for mid-October). Most interesting thing to happen in the tropics since Nadine. Maybe the southern Hemisphere seasons this cycle will actually be insanely active instead of dead which will be a change.RSMC Warning #1 wrote:ANAIS INTENSIFIES GRADUALLY SINCE 00Z AND BECOMES THE HISTORICAL
EARLIER INTENSE TROPICAL CYCLONE OVER THE SOUTH WEST INDIAN OCEAN
![]()
Oh man this is killing me
. Does anyone here think this was a gradual strengthening Anais just underwent? *crickets chirping*
Laplacian wrote:Forgive me, folks, because I'm relatively new here...I have a question to ask that's been bothering me. I see that people often post content that merely is a copy and paste of complete discussions from NHC, JTWC, etc. These copy-and-paste posts do not contain any analysis or insight from the person who posted.
Is the assumption here that there are people in this forum who are incapable of finding official discussions on the Web? If so, then my question is answered.
As a newcomer, I find such posts distracting. When I was teaching, I warned my students against the "diamond in the cow-dung heap" approach on exams. My warning was meant to discourage students from writing everything they knew about the topic associated with a specific exam question (these students expected me to go through all the text in order to find the nugget that perhaps answered the question).
I get the same feeling when I see an official discussion merely copied and pasted in a thread here. Wouldn't it be better just to copy and paste the relevant portion of a discussion and then comment about this relevant portion using individual insight and supporting images?
If I'm way out in left field on this one, I sincerely apologize. But I have to admit it's frustrating to see lines and lines and lines of copied and pasted text without any comment or insight. Again, I apologize if my observations as a newcomer are off base. All I'm saying is that it would be nice to see more posts with more focus. Thanks for understanding.
This is just the way it goes around here. If its an Atlantic storm that is popular the advisories get their own topic thread so it doesn't clutter things up. If its something like this everything just goes into one thread. I thought the same as you years back but I think its convenient to just look at those discussions from here instead of searching or going somewhere else to find it. Most people don't regularly visit those sites so its good they are all in one place. Maybe also the poster has nothing more to add to what is said in the text.P.K. wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:This would be equivalent to a major hurricane in the Atlantic in April, correct?
Season starts on 1st Nov so this is more like a mid May system in the N Atl.
That's wild, extremely rare to put it lightly!!!![]()
Macrocane wrote:I noticed this system until this morning when I read Jeff Masters' blog, I can't believe I didn't see the evolution of this interesting system, it's all Paul's and Richard's fault
Cyclenall wrote:
There is no Richard anywhere, maybe Rafael? And don't worry about missing anything, there is no floater active on the SSD page for this baby.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests