

Moderator: S2k Moderators
dexterlabio wrote:^which makes things more inconsistent. JTWC uses 1-min ave. in reporting wind speed whereas the asian weather agencies (like the JMA) report wind speed in 10-min average...with that, the reported wind speed from the JTWC is expected to be higher than from the JMA. A 75kph sustained winds (10-min ave.) translates to around 85kph (1-min ave.), but this is clearly not the case this time. actually this happens most of the time.
Meow wrote:dexterlabio wrote:^which makes things more inconsistent. JTWC uses 1-min ave. in reporting wind speed whereas the asian weather agencies (like the JMA) report wind speed in 10-min average...with that, the reported wind speed from the JTWC is expected to be higher than from the JMA. A 75kph sustained winds (10-min ave.) translates to around 85kph (1-min ave.), but this is clearly not the case this time. actually this happens most of the time.
The Dvorak technique causes it. The JMA may analyse CI2.5, but the JTWC analyses T2.0.
euro6208 wrote:JMA has their own dvorak scale and don't follow the US one...sometimes JMA is the first to upgrade to TD/TS status for weak storms but for stronger storms, JTWC is way ahead...an 8.0 for U.S is 170 knots...JMA??? i think it's around 120 knots...the disparity only grows...
Meow wrote:euro6208 wrote:JMA has their own dvorak scale and don't follow the US one...sometimes JMA is the first to upgrade to TD/TS status for weak storms but for stronger storms, JTWC is way ahead...an 8.0 for U.S is 170 knots...JMA??? i think it's around 120 knots...the disparity only grows...
Yes, I know their scales are different. In fact, I have already made a comparison for many agencies in October.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests