ATL: CHANTAL - Post-Tropical

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22980
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: CHANTAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1161 Postby wxman57 » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:47 pm

Very weak and disorganized, as I expected recon would find. Poorly-defined center and inflow doesn't appear to be very good. It's struggling with the fast movement. Not vertically aligned.
0 likes   

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: CHANTAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1162 Postby floridasun78 » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:48 pm

wxman57 wrote:Very weak and disorganized, as I expected recon would find. Poorly-defined center and inflow doesn't appear to be very good. It's struggling with the fast movement. Not vertically aligned.

we may have td Chantal at 11pm?
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: Re:

#1163 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:48 pm

Alyono wrote:
Evil Jeremy wrote:
Alyono wrote:or you were all tracking an MLC and the LLC has in fact raced well ahead of the convection


Do you know something that we don't? Because everything we have indicates the LLC is chugging along to the east of whatever recon is looking at:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... imated.gif


what you have is an image. What I am looking at is the hard data. The data so far clearly shows the center beyond a reasonable doubt ahead of the convection with pressures well above Stewart's estimate


problem with that is the satellite overlays are not updated and so where recon is and the sat show the center are will not aligned
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

#1164 Postby floridasun78 » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:50 pm

look like shear winning plus west wind coming from western Caribbean
0 likes   

torrea40

Re: ATL: CHANTAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1165 Postby torrea40 » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:50 pm

wxman57 wrote:Very weak and disorganized, as I expected recon would find. Poorly-defined center and inflow doesn't appear to be very good. It's struggling with the fast movement. Not vertically aligned.


You are crazy, he found winds over 52 mph
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

#1166 Postby SouthDadeFish » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:50 pm

Convection bursting just NE of the center. Aric what are your thoughts on the possibility of continued deep convection "tugging" the LLC a little back to the east, which could help align the circulation?

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
lester
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1305
Age: 36
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 5:21 pm
Location: Washington, DC
Contact:

Re: ATL: CHANTAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1167 Postby lester » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:51 pm

torrea40 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Very weak and disorganized, as I expected recon would find. Poorly-defined center and inflow doesn't appear to be very good. It's struggling with the fast movement. Not vertically aligned.


You are crazy, he found winds over 52 mph


Those winds are rain contaminated.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

#1168 Postby SouthDadeFish » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:51 pm

58 knot flight level winds found lol. Gotta love deep convection in the tropics!
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#1169 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:52 pm

the are they have been investigating is what I thought it was.. just the weak sw quad
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: ATL: CHANTAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1170 Postby Evil Jeremy » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:52 pm

Recon just reported several unflagged readings of 55-58kts FL winds...
0 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

User avatar
Dave
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 13442
Age: 74
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: Milan Indiana
Contact:

#1171 Postby Dave » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:53 pm

This is crazy too...missing 26..it'll be in as soon as the NHC server updates for now here's #27

URNT15 KNHC 082246
AF302 0103A CHANTAL HDOB 27 20130708
223800 1202N 05412W 9654 00400 0110 +215 +215 156038 041 041 013 00
223830 1204N 05411W 9666 00386 0108 +210 //// 154051 053 044 006 01
223900 1205N 05410W 9665 00390 0109 +208 +207 149056 057 048 017 00
223930 1206N 05409W 9673 00382 0112 +200 //// 154055 058 052 019 05
224000 1207N 05408W 9672 00383 0112 +199 +199 156055 056 059 032 00
224030 1208N 05407W 9646 00414 0118 +196 +196 159054 055 060 028 00
224100 1208N 05405W 9675 00388 0120 +201 +201 160050 054 052 033 00
224130 1209N 05404W 9666 00398 0123 +201 //// 160051 053 047 021 01
224200 1210N 05402W 9666 00401 0122 +203 +203 157051 053 043 005 01
224230 1212N 05401W 9671 00398 0125 +204 +204 153052 055 043 004 01
224300 1213N 05400W 9662 00406 0125 +207 +202 152052 055 042 006 03
224330 1214N 05359W 9670 00401 0126 +207 +202 148054 056 043 002 00
224400 1215N 05358W 9665 00405 0126 +210 +197 149055 056 043 003 00
224430 1216N 05356W 9665 00406 0126 +209 +195 149055 057 043 003 00
224500 1217N 05355W 9667 00405 0127 +214 +192 150054 055 041 002 00
224530 1218N 05354W 9664 00409 0128 +218 +182 153056 057 042 002 00
224600 1219N 05353W 9661 00413 0130 +213 +186 153054 057 042 002 00
224630 1220N 05352W 9663 00413 0132 +212 +192 150052 054 037 003 00
224700 1221N 05350W 9669 00407 0132 +216 +187 148051 052 037 002 00
224730 1222N 05349W 9670 00409 0134 +212 +195 147047 050 036 001 00
$$
;
0 likes   

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: CHANTAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1172 Postby floridasun78 » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:54 pm

Evil Jeremy wrote:Recon just reported several unflagged readings of 55-58kts FL winds...

put their unflagged
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#1173 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:54 pm

Those winds support a 50 kt intensity. Could the forward motion be amplifying the surface winds?
0 likes   

SapphireSea
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:13 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: CHANTAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1174 Postby SapphireSea » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:56 pm

Not surprising, I sound like a broken record, but 2004's Earl just opened up while looking impressive. There was low to marginal shear level (0kt-10kt), but it's core just was disrupted by the strong E flow to the point where it finally opened up to a sharp wave. I would not be surprised if this could happen, the fact that this is badly tilted shows that is indeed taking a beating. Once it slows down it should have a chance, as long as the pattern does not progress faster than anticipated and it stalls near land, or if this keeps moving fast and hits the shear in the carrib. It had its chance last night into today IMO.
0 likes   
Forecast Disclaimer:

Don't be stupid. Make your own informed decisions.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re:

#1175 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:56 pm

SouthDadeFish wrote:Convection bursting just NE of the center. Aric what are your thoughts on the possibility of continued deep convection "tugging" the LLC a little back to the east, which could help align the circulation?

[img]http://img703.imageshack.us/img703/2374/ly5p.jpg[/ig]


from sat I would say no.. from recon there clearly is prob in the sw quad being weak from the forward motion. the deep convection that has developed now could be pulling around a little. until now there has never been deep convection this close to the center. if it expands to the north more it could strengthen.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re:

#1176 Postby floridasun78 » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:56 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:Those winds support a 50 kt intensity. Could the forward motion be amplifying the surface winds?

i heard unflagged are error report from plane
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: CHANTAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1177 Postby Alyono » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:56 pm

torrea40 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Very weak and disorganized, as I expected recon would find. Poorly-defined center and inflow doesn't appear to be very good. It's struggling with the fast movement. Not vertically aligned.


You are crazy, he found winds over 52 mph


That wind is not valid!
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: Re:

#1178 Postby NDG » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:56 pm

NDG wrote:
Alyono wrote:
Evil Jeremy wrote:Do you know something that we don't? Because everything we have indicates the LLC is chugging along to the east of whatever recon is looking at:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... imated.gif


what you have is an image. What I am looking at is the hard data. The data so far clearly shows the center beyond a reasonable doubt ahead of the convection with pressures well above Stewart's estimate



I still believe that they never reached the true COC on the initial pass because the pressure was still falling when they turned towards the SW quadrant of the storm.


I stand corrected, it indeed looks like the lowest pressure is 1010 mb, very weird despite the high winds it just found.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Re:

#1179 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:57 pm

floridasun78 wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:Those winds support a 50 kt intensity. Could the forward motion be amplifying the surface winds?

i heard unflagged are error report from plane


Unflagged = legitimate. Highest legitimate SFMR is about 47 kt as well.
0 likes   

hurricanekid416
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 179
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 2:43 pm

#1180 Postby hurricanekid416 » Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:57 pm

I doubt they downgrade under a ts because it's close to land
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests