ATL: CHANTAL - Post-Tropical

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

#1201 Postby floridasun78 » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:05 pm

ok what i see wind still at 45mph with plane surface wind report until now
Last edited by floridasun78 on Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Dave
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 13442
Age: 74
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: Milan Indiana
Contact:

#1202 Postby Dave » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:06 pm

URNT15 KNHC 082256
AF302 0103A CHANTAL HDOB 28 20130708
224800 1223N 05348W 9671 00408 0134 +214 +196 145046 047 037 002 00
224830 1225N 05347W 9664 00413 0134 +216 +195 147048 049 037 000 03
224900 1226N 05346W 9666 00412 0134 +216 +198 147047 049 036 000 00
224930 1227N 05345W 9667 00413 0135 +216 +203 146044 046 035 000 00
225000 1228N 05343W 9665 00416 0135 +217 +201 148045 046 036 002 00
225030 1229N 05342W 9664 00416 0136 +217 +202 149045 047 035 001 00
225100 1230N 05341W 9665 00418 0137 +216 +202 150044 045 035 001 00
225130 1231N 05340W 9667 00415 0137 +216 +202 148044 046 035 001 00
225200 1233N 05339W 9665 00417 0139 +215 +204 148044 046 035 002 00
225230 1234N 05338W 9667 00417 0140 +215 +201 147043 045 033 002 00
225300 1234N 05338W 9667 00417 0142 +215 +203 148041 042 033 001 00
225330 1236N 05335W 9665 00420 0143 +215 +200 145040 041 033 002 00
225400 1237N 05334W 9666 00421 0144 +215 +202 144039 040 033 001 00
225430 1238N 05333W 9663 00423 0143 +215 +203 144039 040 033 001 03
225500 1239N 05332W 9667 00420 0144 +215 +201 143039 041 033 002 00
225530 1240N 05331W 9668 00418 0144 +215 +200 143040 041 034 000 00
225600 1242N 05330W 9663 00424 0145 +215 +201 144038 040 032 003 00
225630 1243N 05328W 9667 00422 0144 +216 +197 145040 041 033 002 00
225700 1244N 05327W 9665 00421 0144 +217 +195 149040 040 034 002 00
225730 1245N 05326W 9664 00423 0144 +217 +194 150041 043 034 002 00
$$
;
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#1203 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:06 pm

the center appears north of those light wind readings pretty much right inline with sat. those light winds are misleading do to its forward motion.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

SapphireSea
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:13 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: CHANTAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1204 Postby SapphireSea » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:06 pm

Theoretically wouldn't the winds still be suspect if it is only occurring in the heaviest convection so far away from the LLC? Or have the NHC historically used the highest FL winds regardless of the organization of the system? I would think they would use the best winds closest to the center to "measure" the storm. The powerful FL winds may isolated and not really describe the system. Anyone have the answer?
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

#1205 Postby SouthDadeFish » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:07 pm

I think 50 knots (60mph) could easily be justified with flight level winds of 58 knots occurring at just 1,000 feet up. I think the NHC will probably go with 45 knots though. Again, just my opinion and not a forecast.
Last edited by SouthDadeFish on Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: CHANTAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1206 Postby Alyono » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:07 pm

SapphireSea wrote:Theoretically wouldn't the winds still be suspect if it is only occurring in the heaviest convection so far away from the LLC? Or have the NHC historically used the highest FL winds regardless of the organization of the system? I would think they would use the best winds closest to the center to "measure" the storm. The powerful FL winds may isolated and not really describe the system. Anyone have the answer?


the max winds are the highest 1 minute mean winds anywhere within the TV circulation
0 likes   

User avatar
weatherwindow
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 904
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 9:48 am
Location: key west/ft lauderdale

Re:

#1207 Postby weatherwindow » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:07 pm

[quote="Jevo"]Someone do the Big Googly eyed Emote for Chantel's big brother making landfall in the same place in 2 weeks at +348 (obviously its a long term forecast and subject to large track and intensity error
All kidding aside, it certainly is not out of the question. Hutchinson Island will not soon forget 2004 with Frances and Jeanne. Savannah and the Low Country have even longer memories of the twin killers of 1893. In the latter case, the landfalls were not as coincident as those of 04, but the impact was so much more devastating in both life and property. Of course, the first question and the current topic is: how will the track and intensity of Chantal evolve. If the track evolves as the GFS illustrates and Chantal survives to be ejected west, perhaps 04 will emerge as the ultimate analog.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: CHANTAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1208 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:07 pm

SouthDadeFish wrote:
The 58 knot reading was flight level winds....


58 kt at FL = 52 kt at the surface.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#1209 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:08 pm

that VDM is wrong look at the wind direction to the north of it ... s to sw winds veering to se as they have been flying away/
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#1210 Postby Evil Jeremy » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:09 pm

Image
0 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re:

#1211 Postby SouthDadeFish » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:10 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:that VDM is wrong look at the wind direction to the north of it ... s to sw winds veering to se as they have been flying away/


I can buy your theory there too, since the extrapolated pressure dropped a bit for a stretch as they flew away from the VDM center.
0 likes   

SapphireSea
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:13 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: CHANTAL - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1212 Postby SapphireSea » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:10 pm

Alyono wrote:
SapphireSea wrote:Theoretically wouldn't the winds still be suspect if it is only occurring in the heaviest convection so far away from the LLC? Or have the NHC historically used the highest FL winds regardless of the organization of the system? I would think they would use the best winds closest to the center to "measure" the storm. The powerful FL winds may isolated and not really describe the system. Anyone have the answer?


the max winds are the highest 1 minute mean winds anywhere within the TV circulation


Ah. I see. I would assume some rounding takes place if the highest winds are isolated. In any event it's quite surprising that it is so strong in at this stage. I thought maybe 45kt and cap out for now, maybe I was/am wrong.
0 likes   
Forecast Disclaimer:

Don't be stupid. Make your own informed decisions.

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

#1213 Postby northjaxpro » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:11 pm

:uarrow: That looks extremely ominous. Thank God that is 386 hours out. Definitely hope that doesn't come to fruition as that will be right on top of me.

We have enough to deal with Chantal in the 5-6 day range, so I don't even want to focus on this for the time being.
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

#1214 Postby SouthDadeFish » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:11 pm

Will recon be able to do another pass or are they going home now?
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: Re:

#1215 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:11 pm

SouthDadeFish wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:that VDM is wrong look at the wind direction to the north of it ... s to sw winds veering to se as they have been flying away/


I can buy your theory there too, since the extrapolated pressure dropped a bit for a stretch as they flew away from the VDM center.


That whole area down there appears to just be weak winds do to its forward motion... the center should be quite a bit north of that.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re:

#1216 Postby Evil Jeremy » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:12 pm

SouthDadeFish wrote:Will recon be able to do another pass or are they going home now?


Recon is suppoused to be investigating the storm until 8:30pm if I remember right...
0 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: Re:

#1217 Postby SouthDadeFish » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:12 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:that VDM is wrong look at the wind direction to the north of it ... s to sw winds veering to se as they have been flying away/


I can buy your theory there too, since the extrapolated pressure dropped a bit for a stretch as they flew away from the VDM center.


That whole area down there appears to just be weak winds do to its forward motion... the center should be quite a bit north of that.


I hope recon can do another pass to verify this.
0 likes   

User avatar
Dave
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 13442
Age: 74
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: Milan Indiana
Contact:

#1218 Postby Dave » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:12 pm

Product: Air Force Vortex Message (URNT12 KNHC)
Transmitted: 8th day of the month at 23:01Z
Aircraft: Air Force Aircraft (Last 3 digits of the tail number are 302)
Storm Number & Year: 03L in 2013
Storm Name: Chantal (flight in the North Atlantic basin)
Mission Number: 1
Observation Number: 10
A. Time of Center Fix: 8th day of the month at 22:27:40Z
B. Center Fix Coordinates: 11°38'N 54°34'W (11.6333N 54.5667W)
B. Center Fix Location: 355 miles (572 km) to the ESE (107°) from Bridgetown, Barbados.
C. Minimum Height at Standard Level: Not Available
D. Estimated (by SFMR or visually) Maximum Surface Wind: 27kts (~ 31.1mph)
E. Location of the Estimated Maximum Surface Wind: 25 nautical miles (29 statute miles) to the ESE (115°) of center fix
F. Maximum Flight Level Wind Inbound: From 179° at 29kts (From the S at ~ 33.4mph)
G. Location of Maximum Flight Level Wind Inbound: 28 nautical miles (32 statute miles) to the ESE (116°) of center fix
H. Minimum Sea Level Pressure: 1010mb (29.83 inHg) - Extrapolated
I. Maximum Flight Level Temp & Pressure Altitude Outside Eye: 20°C (68°F) at a pressure alt. of 395m (1,296ft)
J. Maximum Flight Level Temp & Pressure Altitude Inside Eye: 22°C (72°F) at a pressure alt. of 392m (1,286ft)
K. Dewpoint Temp (collected at same location as temp inside eye): 22°C (72°F)
K. Sea Surface Temp (collected at same location as temp inside eye): Not Available
L. Eye Character: Not Available
M. Eye Shape: Not Available
N. Fix Determined By: Penetration, Wind and Temperature
N. Fix Level: 1,500 feet
O. Navigational Fix Accuracy: 0.02 nautical miles
O. Meteorological Accuracy: 9 nautical miles
Remarks Section - Remarks That Were Decoded...
Sea Level Pressure Extrapolation From: Below 1,500 feet
Maximum Flight Level Temp: 22°C (72°F) which was observed 11 nautical miles (13 statute miles) to the ESE (106°) from the flight level center
Remarks Section - Additional Remarks...
PRELIMINARY, DO NOT RETRANSMIT
MAX OUTBOUND AND MAX FL WIND 58 KT 042/37 22:39:30Z
MIN SLP 1010MB 042/21 22:35:00Z
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145469
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Re:

#1219 Postby cycloneye » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:15 pm

Evil Jeremy wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:Will recon be able to do another pass or are they going home now?


Recon is suppoused to be investigating the storm until 8:30pm if I remember right...



Yes,until 8:30 PM EDT.

08/2030Z TO 09/0030Z
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
SouthDadeFish
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2835
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 2:54 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

#1220 Postby SouthDadeFish » Mon Jul 08, 2013 6:16 pm

Recon found those high flight level winds right where the reds are in this enhanced IR image. This satellite image was taken at about the same time the winds were reported. Keep in mind the satellite images lag behind the real-time recon obs:

Image
0 likes   


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests