ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Cainer
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 188
Age: 34
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 3:26 pm
Location: Yarmouth, Nova Scotia

Re: Re:

#701 Postby Cainer » Fri Aug 16, 2013 3:27 pm

wxman57 wrote:I think it will. But it appears that LLC is dissipating. Definitely moving SW now, something we've seen many times. Look for a new center to form farther north closer to the convection.


Could this turn out to be a situation similar to Debby, where continual NE center relocations lead to the disturbance moving in a more northerly direction?
0 likes   

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2650
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

#702 Postby USTropics » Fri Aug 16, 2013 3:28 pm

sorry about that Portastorm. I forget to include those when using the quick reply.
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11496
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#703 Postby GCANE » Fri Aug 16, 2013 3:32 pm

Air is destabilizing. Good flare up of afternoon thunderstorms over Yucatan.
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re:

#704 Postby Portastorm » Fri Aug 16, 2013 3:34 pm

USTropics wrote:sorry about that Portastorm. I forget to include those when using the quick reply.


Muchas gracias ... now let's get back to 92L. Looks like we might have something to actually talk about soon enough.
0 likes   
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.

User avatar
Rgv20
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2466
Age: 38
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Edinburg/McAllen Tx

#705 Postby Rgv20 » Fri Aug 16, 2013 3:36 pm

Afternoon discussion out of the NWS in Brownsville..

LONG TERM /SUNDAY THROUGH FRIDAY/...UNCERTAINTY WITH A WEAK LOW OFF
THE NORTHWEST TIP OF THE YUCATAN PENINSULA DOES CAST A BIT MORE OF A
CHALLENGE INTO THE LONG TERM. THE LOCATION OF FINAL DEMISE OF THE
LOW...AND ITS INTENSITY...COULD CHANGE THINGS A LOT. HOWEVER...FOR
NOW FOLLOWED PERSISTENCE WITH AN EYE TOWARD AN AREA OF SURFACE LOW
PRESSURE CONTINUING TO MOVE EAST OVER THE WEEKEND...WITH ABOUT AN
EVEN CHANCE OF DEVELOPMENT INTO A TROPICAL CYCLONE. MOVEMENT WEST
WOULD BE MORE FAVORABLE THAN MOVEMENT NORTH...WHERE A MID LEVEL
TROUGH WOULD LIE ROUGHLY OVER THE SOUTHEAST UNITED STATES. THE
EUROPEAN MODEL SEEMS TO TAKE A QUICKER ROUTE TO THE WEST...WHICH
COULD ULTIMATELY BRING SLIGHTLY HIGHER RAIN CHANCES TO THE RIO
GRANDE VALLEY...BUT THE AMOUNTS ARE NOT YET MAKING A BIG DENT IN THE
ONGOING FORECAST. EVEN A BLEND OF SOME OF THE OTHER MODELS...WHICH
TRACK MORE NORTHWEST OR SO...COULD END UP ON A TRACK CLOSER TO THE
LOWER TEXAS COAST THAN NOW. I BLENDED SLIGHTLY HIGHER POPS FROM THE
EUROPEAN IN FOR NEXT WEEK...BUT THIS AFFECTED THE MARINE AREAS MORE
THAN OVER LAND. FOR NOW...
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#706 Postby tailgater » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:02 pm

I don't see a second llc. trying to form the first one still looks tight to me still stationery its not going to develop with that upper level low right on top of it though.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#707 Postby Stormcenter » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:06 pm

Not as pronounced as it was this morning. IMO

tailgater wrote:I don't see a second llc. trying to form the first one still looks tight to me still stationery its not going to develop with that upper level low right on top of it though.
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#708 Postby tailgater » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:11 pm

tailgater wrote:I don't see a second llc. trying to form the first one still looks tight to me still stationery its not going to develop with that upper level low. right on top of it though.


Probably not but the 850 vorticity has increased
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#709 Postby BigA » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:11 pm

Stormcenter wrote:Not as pronounced as it was this morning. IMO

tailgater wrote:I don't see a second llc. trying to form the first one still looks tight to me still stationery its not going to develop with that upper level low right on top of it though.


Running through the 8-hour loop, the circulation looks about the same as it was this morning. But yes, there is little chance that this can get convection over the center with an ULL directly to its northeast. The models (CMC, GFS, NAVGEM; haven't seen the ECMWF vorticity) have been consistent with weakening the ULL, but it doesn't appear to by dying off yet.
0 likes   

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

#710 Postby HurriGuy » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:19 pm

But regardless, the convection is building to the north instead of being sheered apart. I would think the ULL must be dying off. Still a newbie, and love feedback!
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: Re:

#711 Postby ozonepete » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:23 pm

wxman57 wrote:
Bailey1777 wrote:wxman57 forget models member opinions and all that....just your professional take....does this mess even make td?


I think it will. But it appears that LLC is dissipating. Definitely moving SW now, something we've seen many times. Look for a new center to form farther north closer to the convection.


Hi wxman. :) I agree with you here, which is almost always the best thing to do, lol. That LLC west of the Yuatan is dissolving rapidly and a new center is forming well N or NNE of it very close to the convection. One would think this really has a good chance to develop now, especially if the forward speed stays down. Would you say the upper Texas coast is in play now?
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#712 Postby HouTXmetro » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:23 pm

Looks like the last few frames show the LLC from earlier slowly consolidating northward toward the ULL. But that ULL is still very present and i think some of us (including myself) are getting confused as to if a new LLC is forming due to the increased convection around the ULL.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/gmex/flash-wv.html
Last edited by HouTXmetro on Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#713 Postby HurriGuy » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:25 pm

I agree with both of you guys. It looks really clear on infared that the two are merging.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#714 Postby ozonepete » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:27 pm

BigA wrote:
Stormcenter wrote:Not as pronounced as it was this morning. IMO

tailgater wrote:I don't see a second llc. trying to form the first one still looks tight to me still stationery its not going to develop with that upper level low right on top of it though.


Running through the 8-hour loop, the circulation looks about the same as it was this morning. But yes, there is little chance that this can get convection over the center with an ULL directly to its northeast. The models (CMC, GFS, NAVGEM; haven't seen the ECMWF vorticity) have been consistent with weakening the ULL, but it doesn't appear to by dying off yet.


The first LLC we were watching all day is already stretched out from east to west and just about gone. This is back to being a tropical disturbance with multiple candidate LLCs rotating around near or under the best convection and MLC. We should see a final LLC win out much more to the NNE under the southern end of the blossoming convection. That first one is not going to be involved anymore.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#715 Postby Sanibel » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:39 pm

GCANE wrote:Air is destabilizing. Good flare up of afternoon thunderstorms over Yucatan.




The displaced convection is filling-in in a curved band. The convection over Yucatan is bursting. This looks like a cyclonic loop and possible direction change. Could be about to take-off.
0 likes   

Stormlover2012
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 262
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 11:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#716 Postby Stormlover2012 » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:40 pm

Direction change to florida?
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#717 Postby Alyono » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:40 pm

watch the broad low, not any eddy. I'd expect the broad low to move generally to the WNW. May be more of threat to Texas now than NE Mexico, especially since most of the storms should be north of the center.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#718 Postby Dean4Storms » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:43 pm

Evidently the Mobile NWS office see's what I was talking about earlier about a circulation moving northward toward the upper Gulf Coast.

From this afternoons AFD....

.MARINE...A WEAK SURFACE CIRCULATION OVER THE NORTH-CENTRAL GULF
COAST WILL ERODE TONIGHT AS A SURFACE CIRCULATION FORMS OVER THE
SOUTHERN GULF OF MEX AND MOVES NORTH. THIS CIRCULATION WILL MOVE
ONSHORE ON THE LOUISIANA COAST SATURDAY NIGHT INTO SUNDAY. MODERATE
TO AT TIMES STRONG ONSHORE FLOW IS EXPECTED TO MOVE OVER AREA
COASTAL WATERS SATURDAY INTO SATURDAY NIGHT. AM NOT EXPECTING MORE
THAN EX CAUTION LEVEL WINDS/SEAS ATTM...THOUGH DEPENDING UPON HOW
THE SYSTEM DEVELOPS AND MOVES NORTH IS STILL IN FLUX.
0 likes   

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

#719 Postby BigA » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:44 pm

Taking a closer look, it makes sense that the LLC is dissipating, while the overall large-scale circulation remains. Looking at the 850 vorticity map, the vorticity over the circulation hasn't weakened. However, that is satellite-derived and likely unable to pick out small-scale changes such as the weakening of the small LLC. Once (if?) the upper-level low weakens, I like 92's chances as long as it moves more west than north in the short run.
0 likes   

nautical wheeler
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:13 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#720 Postby nautical wheeler » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:49 pm

:double:


Do we have multiple LLC's or just a naked LLC and a convective MLC? Is that MLC with the convective activity that same ULL we were looking at this morning? Did it spin itself down?

I figured I would come back from work and see the ULL having dissipated completely and convection starting to wrap itself around the LLC.
0 likes   


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests