

Moderator: S2k Moderators
Alyono wrote:the GFS only develops anything after the resolution truncation
Would not read too much into it
Hammy wrote:Alyono wrote:the GFS only develops anything after the resolution truncation
Would not read too much into it
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the resolution drop following 192 hours? That's when it goes to every 12 hours from three anyway. Development is being shown at 165 hours with 993mb at 183 hours, during which the plots are still three hourly. I still say there has been pretty good consistency overall with the exception of a few runs, in showing something on the 30th or 31st, and as the date gets closer the GFS has not backed off at all, and in fact seems to have slowly moved up both the time frame and intensity overall. The Euro also seems to show some hints of activity in the MDR which it has not done in quite some time.
ROCK wrote:maybe so Ricky but I know an uptick when I see one...GFS be damned...we have all seen lulls before but what gets me is just because the GFS doesnt see anything doesnt mean a hill of beans. It never saw Felix or Dean...and when it finally did see them they were 1010MB lows....
Hammy wrote:latest GFS has the Aug 31 wave turning NW before exiting and coming off in Morocco.
Hammy wrote:latest GFS has the Aug 31 wave turning NW before exiting and coming off in Morocco.
Fego wrote:After seeing the 00 run, seems to me that the GFS is just responding to the atmospherics conditions that prevail in the Atlantic. If the MDR is full of dry air and easterly shear, then the GFS will not develop those waves or lows. Though, you must admit that is unusual to see a bunch of runs showing below the normal activity in the second week of september.
cycloneye wrote:The 00z ECMWF has this small TD NE of Leewards. With the MJO arriving at the Atlantic basin,I would expect more developments from the models than what they are showing.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests