Thoughts on 2013 Atlantic Hurricane Season

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: Re:

#461 Postby RL3AO » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:55 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:
I meant as far as a major hitting land. I just can't believe how incredibly lucky the US has been to avoid MAJOR cane landfall for so many years. It almost defies odds and is difficult to comprehend....


The term "major" is misleading, because it relies on the outdated Saffir-Simpson scale. Water is what kills people, yet the public solely relies on a windscale to judge potential impacts of hurricanes. By definition, Ike and Sandy were not majors when they made landfall in the US. However, I'd bet people in New Jersey and Texas would argue that those storms made a "major" impact on their lives.
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: Re:

#462 Postby ConvergenceZone » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:56 pm

Alyono wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:I meant as far as a major hitting land. I just can't believe how incredibly lucky the US has been to avoid MAJOR cane landfall for so many years. It almost defies odds and is difficult to comprehend....


the point is... you are focusing on majors when majors mean nothing. Does not really matter what the peak winds are in a very small portion of the storm




Then blame the media and the weather channel for shoving in our faces every year that "the US avoids another major cane from hitting land once again!"..........
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: Re:

#463 Postby ConvergenceZone » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:57 pm

RL3AO wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:
I meant as far as a major hitting land. I just can't believe how incredibly lucky the US has been to avoid MAJOR cane landfall for so many years. It almost defies odds and is difficult to comprehend....


The term "major" is misleading, because it relies on the outdated Saffir-Simpson scale. Water is what kills people, yet the public solely relies on a windscale to judge potential impacts of hurricanes. By definition, Ike and Sandy were not majors when they made landfall in the US. However, I'd bet people in New Jersey and Texas would argue that those storms made a "major" impact on their lives.



Are you stating that it wouldn't be any worse if a cat 5 hit land as opposed to a cat 1 or 2?? I always thought it would be.......I think I'd rather have a cat 1 hit than a major cat 5 any day of the week.........
Last edited by ConvergenceZone on Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: Re:

#464 Postby Alyono » Fri Aug 23, 2013 7:59 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:
I meant as far as a major hitting land. I just can't believe how incredibly lucky the US has been to avoid MAJOR cane landfall for so many years. It almost defies odds and is difficult to comprehend....


The term "major" is misleading, because it relies on the outdated Saffir-Simpson scale. Water is what kills people, yet the public solely relies on a windscale to judge potential impacts of hurricanes. By definition, Ike and Sandy were not majors when they made landfall in the US. However, I'd bet people in New Jersey and Texas would argue that those storms made a "major" impact on their lives.



So does that mean that it wouldn't be any worse if a cat 5 hit land?? I always thought it would be.......I think I'd rather have a cat 1 hit than a major cat 5 any day of the week.........


a small cat 5 would cause less damage than a large cat 1 because a far small area would be impacted. We've conclusively demonstrated that the past few years
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: Re:

#465 Postby ConvergenceZone » Fri Aug 23, 2013 8:03 pm

a small cat 5 would cause less damage than a large cat 1 because a far small area would be impacted. We've conclusively demonstrated that the past few years



I understand what you are saying....Then bring on the cat 5s!!!!!! I don't feel so bad now for wanting them :) I would much rather have a cat 5 then as opposed to what people had to go through with Sandy.... Hopefully we will get 1 cat 5 this year anyway....
0 likes   

User avatar
TropicalAnalystwx13
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Age: 27
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

#466 Postby TropicalAnalystwx13 » Fri Aug 23, 2013 8:40 pm

Of course, it depends on where the storm hits. I'm sure a small Category 5 hitting Miami would have a price tag and death toll much higher than a large Category 1 landfall in the same location...
0 likes   

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: Re:

#467 Postby SoupBone » Fri Aug 23, 2013 10:02 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:
I meant as far as a major hitting land. I just can't believe how incredibly lucky the US has been to avoid MAJOR cane landfall for so many years. It almost defies odds and is difficult to comprehend....


It doesn't defy odds though, if you consider how old the earth is and how small of a window we've recorded data. It's simply impossible to say that. It's possible that the U.S. went 100 years without a major landfall hurricane, we just haven't been around long enough to have witnessed it, or found evidence to support it.

Just wanted to add, I don't believe we ever went 100 years without a landfall, I'm just saying that it's simply impossible for us to say with any certainty.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4230
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re:

#468 Postby abajan » Fri Aug 23, 2013 10:54 pm

Alyono wrote:I almost wonder if this is going to be another 1977 at this rate. We must consider that ALL basins have below average activity this year.

Perhaps we have a global quiet year. Happens from time to time
Could sunspots (or the lack thereof) be partly responsible for this lack of activity?
0 likes   

User avatar
HedwigTramp
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:18 pm
Location: Hedwig Village (Houston, Texas)

Re: Re:

#469 Postby HedwigTramp » Fri Aug 23, 2013 10:58 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:
a small cat 5 would cause less damage than a large cat 1 because a far small area would be impacted. We've conclusively demonstrated that the past few years



I understand what you are saying....Then bring on the cat 5s!!!!!! I don't feel so bad now for wanting them :) I would much rather have a cat 5 then as opposed to what people had to go through with Sandy.... Hopefully we will get 1 cat 5 this year anyway....



How would you react if others were wishing for an "exciting" 9.0 quake in northern California?
Cat 4s and 5s at landfall are nasty beasts and I would be a happy camper if they became extinct.

Remember that there is some unlucky soul living in the center of the cone of any cane.
0 likes   
Carla (1961), Claudette (1979), Danielle (1980), Alicia (1983), Allison (1989), Jerry (1989), Dean (1995), Allison (1989), Ike (2008), Harvey (2017)....and in the eye of the Fort Bend tornado of 1998.
Disclaimer: If I had ANY forecasting ability, do you think I would have stayed put for so many storms? Y'all get your information from the NWS.

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Re:

#470 Postby Hammy » Fri Aug 23, 2013 11:03 pm

HedwigTramp wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:
a small cat 5 would cause less damage than a large cat 1 because a far small area would be impacted. We've conclusively demonstrated that the past few years



I understand what you are saying....Then bring on the cat 5s!!!!!! I don't feel so bad now for wanting them :) I would much rather have a cat 5 then as opposed to what people had to go through with Sandy.... Hopefully we will get 1 cat 5 this year anyway....



How would you react if others were wishing for an "exciting" 9.0 quake in northern California?
Cat 4s and 5s at landfall are nasty beasts and I would be a happy camper if they became extinct.

Remember that there is some unlucky soul living in the center of the cone of any cane.


nothing wrong with wanting to watch a hurricane spin in the open ocean far from land.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5899
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: Thoughts on activity as heart of season nears

#471 Postby MGC » Fri Aug 23, 2013 11:04 pm

I'm sure Andrew would still be the damage king if the hurricane had tracked a bit more north and went through Miami instead of Homestead. Lots of expensive real estate up that way. Would be nice if we could get through the 1013 season without a hurricane forming.....MGC
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: Re:

#472 Postby ConvergenceZone » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:01 am

HedwigTramp wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:
a small cat 5 would cause less damage than a large cat 1 because a far small area would be impacted. We've conclusively demonstrated that the past few years



I understand what you are saying....Then bring on the cat 5s!!!!!! I don't feel so bad now for wanting them :) I would much rather have a cat 5 then as opposed to what people had to go through with Sandy.... Hopefully we will get 1 cat 5 this year anyway....



How would you react if others were wishing for an "exciting" 9.0 quake in northern California?
Cat 4s and 5s at landfall are nasty beasts and I would be a happy camper if they became extinct.

Remember that there is some unlucky soul living in the center of the cone of any cane.




Nope, I've learned tonight that non major's are are much nastier....So if you are going to wish for development, might as well wish for the less nastier of the two....
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Alexis
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 683
Age: 29
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 7:59 pm
Location: Miami,Florida

Re: Re:

#473 Postby Hurricane Alexis » Sat Aug 24, 2013 2:36 am

ConvergenceZone wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:
a small cat 5 would cause less damage than a large cat 1 because a far small area would be impacted. We've conclusively demonstrated that the past few years


I understand what you are saying....Then bring on the cat 5s!!!!!! I don't feel so bad now for wanting them :) I would much rather have a cat 5 then as opposed to what people had to go through with Sandy.... Hopefully we will get 1 cat 5 this year anyway....


Nope, I've learned tonight that non major's are are much nastier....So if you are going to wish for development, might as well wish for the less nastier of the two....


Low end hurricanes can be extremely devastating but let's not forget that a cat 5 moving right over a major metro area would absolute obliterate the city.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#474 Postby Alyono » Sat Aug 24, 2013 3:55 am

of course, a direct hit of a small cat 5 would be awful

However, the odds are quite small that it would make the direct hit

as for the season... the large scale pattern simply is not favorable this year. Given what I am seeing in the GFS, I am starting to wonder if we will even get to 15 storms this year
0 likes   

ninel conde

Re:

#475 Postby ninel conde » Sat Aug 24, 2013 6:19 am

Alyono wrote:of course, a direct hit of a small cat 5 would be awful

However, the odds are quite small that it would make the direct hit

as for the season... the large scale pattern simply is not favorable this year. Given what I am seeing in the GFS, I am starting to wonder if we will even get to 15 storms this year


not close to 15. every day that goes by the gfs pushes back by one day any development. right now im starting to wonder if any canes develop. GFS shows a few lows out to 384 this morning but no canes out to sept 9. rather amazing. MJO, if it really does materialize, might be able to negate the dry air enough for a burst of 2 or 3 storms in sept. im confident the season ends early as the nw flow over the east coast will limit any development in the gom/carib.
0 likes   

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: Thoughts on activity as heart of season nears

#476 Postby otowntiger » Sat Aug 24, 2013 6:40 am

What activity so far this season?? 8-)
0 likes   

ninel conde

Re: Thoughts on activity as heart of season nears

#477 Postby ninel conde » Sat Aug 24, 2013 6:48 am

otowntiger wrote:What activity so far this season?? 8-)


Touche!!
0 likes   

ninel conde

#478 Postby ninel conde » Sat Aug 24, 2013 7:32 am

time to spread a little cheer from mr bastardi.

Joe Bastardi ‏@BigJoeBastardi 10m

ecmwf ensembles showing 3-5 mb pressure falls in sw atlantic basin means in 11-15 day period. Cap about to come off hurricane season
0 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4762
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

#479 Postby psyclone » Sat Aug 24, 2013 8:43 am

I know it's human nature (we see the same behavior in securities markets) but the bearish crowd is probably overplaying their hand a bit here. Suggesting no hurricanes at all form this season? I mean really? When was the last time the Atlantic hurricane season failed to produce a single hurricane? That is absurdly unlikely. Even the El Nino strangled 1997 season managed to hurl a major cane. We'll most certainly get canes and likely at least a couple of majors. Of course that says nothing about whether those storms will impact anyone. On the other hand, with each passing day the bear case becomes more compelling. August has been wasted. It is a key month in the hurricane season and it's been torched. That alone plus the dim prospects on the immediate horizon mean expectations need to be reeled in. the likelihood of my preseason guess of 16-8-4 increasingly looks to have powerball-like odds of coming to fruition. But there's no way I'd throw in the towel at this point.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2811
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

Re: Thoughts on activity as heart of season nears

#480 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Sat Aug 24, 2013 9:42 am

ninel conde wrote:
otowntiger wrote:What activity so far this season?? 8-)


Touche!!


double touché :lol:
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Ian2401, MGC, StormWeather, Stratton23, TampaWxLurker, Ulf and 47 guests