I thought that 00/12 were most accurate, but recently I read some Pros clarifying that the four runs are more or less equal in data. Btw, this afternoon two users argued about this subject.
Lets add some brilliant light to this debate
.GFS 00/12 runs vs 06/18 runs
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
Fego
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 767
- Age: 65
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 7:58 pm
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
- Contact:
GFS 00/12 runs vs 06/18 runs
I'm intrigued about this debate. I have read some interesting comments and debates, about which GFS runs are most precise, or which have the most updated data: 00/12 or 06/18?
I thought that 00/12 were most accurate, but recently I read some Pros clarifying that the four runs are more or less equal in data. Btw, this afternoon two users argued about this subject.
Lets add some brilliant light to this debate .
I thought that 00/12 were most accurate, but recently I read some Pros clarifying that the four runs are more or less equal in data. Btw, this afternoon two users argued about this subject.
Lets add some brilliant light to this debate
.
0 likes
Go Giants! Go Niners! Go Warriors!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: jaguars_22, Majestic-12 [Bot], Sps123 and 48 guests