
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Moderator: S2k Moderators
USTropics wrote:The ECMWF does have one of the highest horizontal resolutions at ~25 km (the GFS resolution up to truncation is ~35 km) for the extended range models. The GFDL I believe has a ~10 km resolution and the HWRF has ~5km resolution, but are mainly used for resolving the inner core of systems.
With that said though, there are other revolving issues regarding resolution that creates problems with the ECMWF and cyclogenesis. There was a presentation made at the University of Miami about 3 weeks ago regarding this. Here is an excerpt:
"It is found that errors associated with vorticity, upper-level divergence, low-level convergence, and moisture within and local to easterly waves is a significant source of uncertainty in the genesis forecast. Much of the small-scale error growth and error variance of the ensemble forecast is associated with localized bands of greater vorticity and divergence, likely related to the difficulty in representing convective bands within the tropical wave.. We investigate the degree to which these errors in the mesoscale limit the predictability of genesis forecasts. Lastly, correlations and lag-correlations between errors are presented. ."
You can see the full presentation here: https://ams.confex.com/ams/15MESO/flvgateway.cgi/id/24837?recordingid=24837
ninel conde wrote:i think the euro has done great in the atlantic this season. if a system of importance were to ever devlop im sure it would show it. the euro has been excellent at seeing the very dry air and it hasnt shown any phantom systems.
tolakram wrote:ninel conde wrote:i think the euro has done great in the atlantic this season. if a system of importance were to ever devlop im sure it would show it. the euro has been excellent at seeing the very dry air and it hasnt shown any phantom systems.
What objective measures are you using to say the euro has done great this season? It just missed showing any significant development with Fernand. If only the euro was available every storm that formed this season would have been a surprise. Right now the euro is matching your suspicion of an MDR too dry to support a storm. Are you sure it's not just a coincidence?
ninel conde wrote:tolakram wrote:ninel conde wrote:i think the euro has done great in the atlantic this season. if a system of importance were to ever devlop im sure it would show it. the euro has been excellent at seeing the very dry air and it hasnt shown any phantom systems.
What objective measures are you using to say the euro has done great this season? It just missed showing any significant development with Fernand. If only the euro was available every storm that formed this season would have been a surprise. Right now the euro is matching your suspicion of an MDR too dry to support a storm. Are you sure it's not just a coincidence?
i wouldnt call it a suspicion. look at the last wave that just came off that the gfs was developing into a strong cane. the wave dried up. it is too dry. the euro has been great at showing pressures correctly and it hasnt shown a single fantasy storm. not to pat myself on the back but in july when i lowered my numbers to 9/2/0 i said the BOC was the one place in the entire basin to expect development and landfalls. back to the models. gfs shows a well developed storm in 7 days around 35w. euro shows nothing. ill wait till the 12z runs come out. if the euro shows nothing and gfs still has the storm, id put my money on the euro. remeber, with this first storm the gfs developed and euro didnt, the gfs has now dropped.
meriland23 wrote:As Bob Dylan put it .. "Times .. they are a-changin''. I am pretty confident in the consistent prediction of a significant change up coming next week imo. Only thing I would question at this point is whether this extensive lull/long barrier we had will cut the season short (or in half) with less hurr's than expected, or whether mother nature came in late is going to rush to finish her job on time (or go later into the season to make up for lost time). I tend to imagine mother nature this season is a lot like a kid coming in a half hour late for class, and has to finish her assignment (afterschool if need be) before she can go home... interesting analogy, but it was the best I could come up with! This is all just a personal opinion btw.
ninel conde wrote:i wouldnt call it a suspicion. look at the last wave that just came off that the gfs was developing into a strong cane. the wave dried up. it is too dry. the euro has been great at showing pressures correctly and it hasnt shown a single fantasy storm. not to pat myself on the back but in july when i lowered my numbers to 9/2/0 i said the BOC was the one place in the entire basin to expect development and landfalls. back to the models. gfs shows a well developed storm in 7 days around 35w. euro shows nothing. ill wait till the 12z runs come out. if the euro shows nothing and gfs still has the storm, id put my money on the euro. remeber, with this first storm the gfs developed and euro didnt, the gfs has now dropped.
The ECMWF does have one of the highest horizontal resolutions at ~25 km (the GFS resolution up to truncation is ~35 km) for the extended range models. The GFDL I believe has a ~10 km resolution and the HWRF has ~5km resolution, but are mainly used for resolving the inner core of systems.
With that said though, there are other revolving issues regarding resolution that creates problems with the ECMWF and cyclogenesis. There was a presentation made at the University of Miami about 3 weeks ago regarding this. Here is an excerpt:
"It is found that errors associated with vorticity, upper-level divergence, low-level convergence, and moisture within and local to easterly waves is a significant source of uncertainty in the genesis forecast. Much of the small-scale error growth and error variance of the ensemble forecast is associated with localized bands of greater vorticity and divergence, likely related to the difficulty in representing convective bands within the tropical wave.. We investigate the degree to which these errors in the mesoscale limit the predictability of genesis forecasts. Lastly, correlations and lag-correlations between errors are presented. ."
You can see the full presentation here: https://ams.confex.com/ams/15MESO/flvgateway.cgi/id/24837?recordingid=24837
So does it seem that currently (and I know its early) that this system is generally forecast to re-curve? I live in central Florida and will be out of the state from 9/4 - 9/12. That's a long time to be gone during hurricane season I know but so far none of the long term models has given me to much reason for concern, unless I'm missing something?? I know things can form closer to home in a short time but I'm liking how this season is going so far. Not having to fret much about pending storm threats. I just hope that continues through September 12 at least.tolakram wrote: with that said ...
The 6Z GFS shows the next wave leaving Africa developing quickly and moving NW. This is the fifth run for the GFS showing development of this wave while it's slowly dropped the idea of developing the wave in front of it. It will be interesting to see if this is reality, or if the model is struggling to figure out when conditions will be favorable.
The euro, near the same time, shows no development and very little vorticity.
Alyono wrote:Looked at some velocity potentials this morning
The East Atlantic may NOT be favorable through the next 16 days.
However, what does look favorable are areas west of 50W. Could see waves not developing until they near the islands of the eastern Caribbean or within the Caribbean itself
Alyono wrote:Looked at some velocity potentials this morning
The East Atlantic may NOT be favorable through the next 16 days.
However, what does look favorable are areas west of 50W. Could see waves not developing until they near the islands of the eastern Caribbean or within the Caribbean itself
Alyono wrote:Looked at some velocity potentials this morning
The East Atlantic may NOT be favorable through the next 16 days.
However, what does look favorable are areas west of 50W. Could see waves not developing until they near the islands of the eastern Caribbean or within the Caribbean itself
CrazyC83 wrote:Agreed the MDR is still quite stable and unfavorable. But as we saw with Fernand, things can blow up quickly farther west. The W Gulf and W Caribbean are highly favorable right now as the MJO creeps in.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests