ATL: INGRID - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4201
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#141 Postby South Texas Storms » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:23 pm

ROCK wrote:159hr....not sure if you consider this inland... :D


http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis ... atl_54.png



It barely moves for 6 days? I don't know about that...
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#142 Postby ROCK » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:26 pm

yeah this run is jacked.....still there on the coast at 168hr

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis ... atl_57.png

177hr still there....FAIL
Last edited by ROCK on Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#143 Postby Wx_Warrior » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:26 pm

what a mess LOL gfs is (not) good for something
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5276
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#144 Postby PTrackerLA » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:29 pm

I've seen the GFS do this time and time again. Stall a storm for a ridiculously long amount of time only to abandon the prolonged stall the following day. I'd expect the GFS to pick out a solution in the next couple of days I think it's confused right now :lol: . With that being said you can see looking at the 850mb vorticity that something does make landfall but then seems to be absorbed into an even larger low pressure/gyre. Very strange.

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2013091100/gfs_vort850_uv200_watl.html
0 likes   

User avatar
LaBreeze
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1497
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:57 pm
Location: SW Louisiana

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#145 Postby LaBreeze » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:31 pm

Is the GFS saying that the ridging stays strong and moves the system into Mexico?
0 likes   
Audrey (1957), Carla (1961), Hilda (1964), Betsy (1965), Edith (1971), Carmen (1974), Danny (1985), Juan (1985), Andrew (1992), Lili (2002), Rita (2005), Gustav (2008), Ike (2008), and stuck in the eye of Iniki (1992) while vacationing in Kauai.

Not an official forecast by any means.

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#146 Postby ROCK » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:33 pm

well the 0Z NAVGEM is rolling....but I will leave it for the night crew to take over.... :D
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#147 Postby ROCK » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:34 pm

LaBreeze wrote:Is the GFS saying that the ridging stays strong and moves the system into Mexico?



the GFS keeps it down there for a week....dont see that happening at all....
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#148 Postby Wx_Warrior » Tue Sep 10, 2013 11:34 pm

LOL...Only 1 need to see Rocky....see ya tomorrow! Fun week.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#149 Postby ROCK » Wed Sep 11, 2013 12:00 am

Ok...I couldn't resist...168 hr NAVGEM has 93 crawling up the coast of MX....there I am done :lol:

Btw- the CMC just keeps it down there....hasn't changed a bit

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis ... atl_34.png
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#150 Postby ROCK » Wed Sep 11, 2013 12:03 am

180 NAV....983mb moving north now...ridge has been destroyed by the Death Star....

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis ... atl_34.png
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#151 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 11, 2013 12:03 am

Doing this for ROCK only! I AM A EURO HUGGER!!!!

0z NAVGEM 150H (ridge opens)

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#152 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 11, 2013 12:14 am

Cant believe that ROCK loves the NAVGem. ;o(
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#153 Postby ROCK » Wed Sep 11, 2013 12:14 am

Thanks Warrior.... :lol: Bring on the euro..I doubt it has changed any
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#154 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 11, 2013 12:27 am

taking a power nap! hope I make it LOL
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5276
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#155 Postby PTrackerLA » Wed Sep 11, 2013 12:29 am

NAVGEM almost seems to move it to the NE the last few frames. Scary opening in high on this run allowing poleward motion. Just the NAVGEM though right? :lol:

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/navgem/2013091100/navgem_z500_vort_watl.html
0 likes   

User avatar
LaBreeze
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1497
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:57 pm
Location: SW Louisiana

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#156 Postby LaBreeze » Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:07 am

PTrackerLA wrote:NAVGEM almost seems to move it to the NE the last few frames. Scary opening in high on this run allowing poleward motion. Just the NAVGEM though right? :lol:

http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/navgem/2013091100/navgem_z500_vort_watl.html


Yep, PTrackerLA, I see the same thing on the last few frames. Do you think that the high will have an opening like that? I know it's just one run - is the NAVGEM fairly unreliable?
0 likes   
Audrey (1957), Carla (1961), Hilda (1964), Betsy (1965), Edith (1971), Carmen (1974), Danny (1985), Juan (1985), Andrew (1992), Lili (2002), Rita (2005), Gustav (2008), Ike (2008), and stuck in the eye of Iniki (1992) while vacationing in Kauai.

Not an official forecast by any means.

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#157 Postby Alyono » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:52 am

Wx_Warrior wrote:what a mess LOL gfs is (not) good for something



why is this GFS bad... ebcause it doesn't hit Texas?

This has always been a likely Mexico storm, GFS not withstanding
0 likes   

caneman

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#158 Postby caneman » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:38 am

Alyono wrote:
Wx_Warrior wrote:what a mess LOL gfs is (not) good for something



why is this GFS bad... ebcause it doesn't hit Texas?

This has always been a likely Mexico storm, GFS not withstanding


Thanks Alyono. Glad a Met said it. Little too much hype going on here. Looks like the models burying it in Mexico thus far look to be right looking at Satellite this morning.
0 likes   

ninel conde

#159 Postby ninel conde » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:53 am

pattern persistence. models may show odd solutions but the south BOC is the favorable place in the atlantic this year.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#160 Postby Alyono » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:56 am

Just looked at 5 day precip totals

6Z GFS is going for nearly 30 inches of rain in the Tampico area
0 likes   


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests