ATL: HUMBERTO - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#441 Postby tolakram » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:05 am

0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

Syx6sic
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 84
Age: 41
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 12:11 pm
Location: Virginia beach VA

#442 Postby Syx6sic » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:18 am

It does look like a eye is trying to form in some the frames I have seen on sats this morning or it could be my eyes playing tricks on me
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#443 Postby RL3AO » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:23 am

It has a banding eye feature. I'm not going to try to do a Dvorak analysis on that, but it does look like the banding feature is worth a +1.0.
0 likes   

User avatar
lilybeth
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 12:31 am
Location: AZ by way of OH

#444 Postby lilybeth » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:25 am

Been really learning reading everyone's posts while following what is now the first hurricane of the season. Thankful for this place and the intelligent people who post here - both pro-met and amateurs alike.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Syx6sic
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 84
Age: 41
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 12:11 pm
Location: Virginia beach VA

Re:

#445 Postby Syx6sic » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:27 am

RL3AO wrote:It has a banding eye feature. I'm not going to try to do a Dvorak analysis on that, but it does look like the banding feature is worth a +1.0.



That's good to see I am not having eye tricks this morning but I see in the track after going north some it does a west turn is the west turn going to keep going west after or recurve to go north then north east?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
lilybeth
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2011 12:31 am
Location: AZ by way of OH

Re: Re:

#446 Postby lilybeth » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:29 am

Syx6sic wrote:
RL3AO wrote:It has a banding eye feature. I'm not going to try to do a Dvorak analysis on that, but it does look like the banding feature is worth a +1.0.



That's good to see I am not having eye tricks this morning but I see in the track after going north some it does a west turn is the west turn going to keep going west after or recurve to go north then north east?


Where could the eye be located? Anyone have an idea?
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#447 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:32 am

11/1145 UTC 16.2N 28.6W T4.5/4.5 HUMBERTO -- Atlantic
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#448 Postby RL3AO » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:35 am

Its very quickly becoming an full eye, instead of just a banding eye. Looks like a complete eye-wall has formed now.

Image
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#449 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:36 am

That data suggests a 75 kt current intensity, perhaps 80 kt depending on ADT and other analyses.
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#450 Postby tolakram » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:38 am

Just completed it's full globe scan. A little distorted but at least you can see the entire storm.

11:45Z

Image
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#451 Postby supercane4867 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:38 am

Humberto appears to be rapidly intensifying :eek:
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#452 Postby RL3AO » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:42 am

supercane4867 wrote:Humberto appears to be rapidly intensifying :eek:


Its intensifying. Lets not go throwing that phrase around when there is a lack of evidence that its true.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#453 Postby RL3AO » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:42 am

Quite the discussion from SSD.


F. T4.5/4.5/D1.0/24HRS

G. IR/EIR/VIS/SSMIS

H. REMARKS...SYSTEM IS CHARACTERIZED BY A BANDING TYPE EYE WHICH
LENDS CONFIDENCE TO THE CENTER LOCATION. GREATER UNCERTAINTY EXISTS
IN THE INSTANTANEOUS INTENSITY ESTIMATE. BANDING OF 12/1O IN VISIBLE
IMAGERY YIELDS A DT OF 4.0 BUT CENTER IS EMBEDDED IN B IN EIR IMAGERY
WHICH SUGGESTS A DT OF 5.0. DT IS SET TO 5.0 DUE TO CONFIDENCE IN CENTER
LOCATION. GIVEN THE CONFLICTING DTS THE FT IS BASED ON A MET OF 4.5. PT
IS ALSO 4.5.
0 likes   

User avatar
Macrocane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4218
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 5:35 pm
Location: El Salvador

Re: ATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#454 Postby Macrocane » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:46 am

It's intensifying but not rapidly IMO. So the record wasn't broken, good for Humberto.
Anyone else thinks this could pull a "Nadine"? models show a weird track with weakening and intensifying phases, doing loops, going south and north during several days.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#455 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:00 am

Based on discussions of 5.0, I would go with an 80 kt intensity right now.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#456 Postby Hammy » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:04 am

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/products/tc_realtime/loop.asp?product=4kmirimg&storm_identifier=AL092013&starting_image=2013AL09_4KMIRIMG_201309110530.GIF

Eye now becoming visible on IR imagery. And Humberto may be starting to take advantage of the upper trough as an outflow channel given the high clouds to the north are starting to move east at a good clip.
Last edited by Hammy on Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#457 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:13 am

AL, 09, 2013091112, , BEST, 0, 163N, 290W, 65, 989, HU,

Officially on the BT reaches hurricane intensity at the exact moment Gustav did.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#458 Postby Sanibel » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:49 am

In my opinion Humberto didn't tie the record because the rebound I didn't expect should retroactively make that eye feature and CDO from yesterday show Humberto was near or at hurricane at the time. If I had a vote I'd say the record stands.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: HUMBERTO - Hurricane - Discussion

#459 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:57 am

Sanibel wrote:In my opinion Humberto didn't tie the record because the rebound I didn't expect should retroactively make that eye feature and CDO from yesterday show Humberto was near or at hurricane at the time. If I had a vote I'd say the record stands.


Yeah, maybe they will make 0600Z or 0900Z the official upgrade. Although it didn't look like a hurricane at 0600Z.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#460 Postby RL3AO » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:58 am

Eye is starting to appear in IR. Continues to show signs of intensification. Still think 85 to 90kts isn't out of the question.
0 likes   


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests