ATL: INGRID - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Rgv20
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2466
Age: 38
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Edinburg/McAllen Tx

#221 Postby Rgv20 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:58 pm

12ECMWF Ensembles stay consisting on 93L just offshore between Tampico and Brownsville come late this weekend.

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#222 Postby ROCK » Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:58 pm

Wx_Warrior wrote:Some things never change. Wait and see approach, and pay attention to what pro's say.


:lol: hey at least I am trying.....and yes it was a 6 pack but probably a storm from 2010!! :D
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 62
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#223 Postby Portastorm » Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:58 pm

South Texas Storms wrote:What are your thoughts on this right now Porta? Do you think the models aren't done shifting?


Nope. I do not think they are done shifting. I think when we see the kind of spread we are seeing now in the ensembles, that suggests the potential for change. The more spread, the more potential for change. We don't even have a clear center of circulation yet. We're all following a mid level center on satellite. Just seems to me that once it re-emerges over water west of the Yucatan and IF it forms some type of center, then let's see how the models handle things. It would seem by Friday morning we all should have a good idea.

I would say that a landfall south of Brownsville is still the most likely of options.
0 likes   
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4201
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#224 Postby South Texas Storms » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:03 pm

0 likes   

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#225 Postby stormlover2013 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:04 pm

8 days a longs way out
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#226 Postby ROCK » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:11 pm

:uarrow: the FIM9 (just looked at it before you posted) rides the coast....the high abruptly shifts east creating an on shore flow. 18Z NAM is showing something similiar in the 500MB heights. at 84hr its just sitting in the BOC getting stronger 993mb...
0 likes   

User avatar
LaBreeze
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1497
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:57 pm
Location: SW Louisiana

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#227 Postby LaBreeze » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:16 pm

ROCK wrote::uarrow: the FIM9 (just looked at it before you posted) rides the coast....the high abruptly shifts east creating an on shore flow. 18Z NAM is showing something similiar in the 500MB heights. at 84hr its just sitting in the BOC getting stronger 993mb...


Rock, how far does it have it riding the coast? Up to Brownsville?
0 likes   
Audrey (1957), Carla (1961), Hilda (1964), Betsy (1965), Edith (1971), Carmen (1974), Danny (1985), Juan (1985), Andrew (1992), Lili (2002), Rita (2005), Gustav (2008), Ike (2008), and stuck in the eye of Iniki (1992) while vacationing in Kauai.

Not an official forecast by any means.

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#228 Postby ROCK » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:26 pm

LaBreeze wrote:
ROCK wrote::uarrow: the FIM9 (just looked at it before you posted) rides the coast....the high abruptly shifts east creating an on shore flow. 18Z NAM is showing something similiar in the 500MB heights. at 84hr its just sitting in the BOC getting stronger 993mb...


Rock, how far does it have it riding the coast? Up to Brownsville?



lol....that was the FIM8 I was looking at....they should just make one...rides up the MX coast and stops in STX...
0 likes   

djmikey
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:04 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#229 Postby djmikey » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:33 pm

So....it sounds like models are coming back north? Not like yesterday, but trending back that way?
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4201
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#230 Postby South Texas Storms » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:51 pm

18z GFS is stronger and further north than the 12z run so far through 69 hours.
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2013091118/gfs_z850_vort_watl_24.png
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#231 Postby Hammy » Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:59 pm

South Texas Storms wrote:18z GFS is stronger and further north than the 12z run so far through 69 hours.
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfs/2013091118/gfs_z850_vort_watl_24.png


96 hours out, back to showing a hurricane.
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/gfsfull/2013091118/gfsfull_pres_wind_atl_33.png
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#232 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:07 pm

111h gfs 18z

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4201
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#233 Postby South Texas Storms » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:09 pm

:uarrow:
Where is the shortwave that will probably push to ridge off to the east? Just off that map?

Edit: The ridge shifts to Louisiana by 138 hrs on this run, so if 93L can move slower across the Gulf, then maybe it can move further north towards south TX.
Last edited by South Texas Storms on Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#234 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:11 pm

123H gfz 18z

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#235 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:17 pm

That's about it for 18z GFS...Wait for the 0z and King EURO
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#236 Postby HouTXmetro » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:19 pm

Looks like it weakens rapidly while hugging the Mexican coast between 111-123 hours.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5276
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Models

#237 Postby PTrackerLA » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:21 pm

Much more believable run on the GFS, no longer a nearly 5 day stall that was being shown yesterday.

Just a quick comparison since I have both open on in my browser...The 12z NAVGEM and 18z GFS are nearly identical through the first 100 or so hours but reach very different results in the end.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

#238 Postby Hammy » Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:45 pm

What is rather interesting, if I am reading the models correctly, is that whatever gets going in the gulf will come from that large area of moisture behind 93L merging with 90E after it gets pulled north.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re:

#239 Postby Alyono » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:35 pm

Hammy wrote:What is rather interesting, if I am reading the models correctly, is that whatever gets going in the gulf will come from that large area of moisture behind 93L merging with 90E after it gets pulled north.


what will get going in the Gulf will be 93L. That EPAC system will simply become part of the inflow
0 likes   

User avatar
Rgv20
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2466
Age: 38
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Edinburg/McAllen Tx

#240 Postby Rgv20 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:13 pm

18zGFS operational run thru 108 hours is right on top of the GFS Ensemble Means....93L just east of Tampico by late Sunday Night.

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests