ATL: INGRID - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145299
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 50% - 70%

#221 Postby cycloneye » Wed Sep 11, 2013 6:27 pm

8 PM TWO at 50%-70%

A BROAD AREA OF LOW PRESSURE OVER THE YUCATAN PENINSULA IS PRODUCING
DISORGANIZED SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS. THIS SYSTEM IS EXPECTED TO
ENTER THE BAY OF CAMPECHE TOMORROW WHERE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
ARE CONDUCIVE FOR DEVELOPMENT. THIS SYSTEM IS LIKELY TO BECOME A
TROPICAL CYCLONE IF IT MOVES OVER THE BAY OF CAMPECHE FAR ENOUGH
FROM LAND. THIS SYSTEM HAS A MEDIUM CHANCE...50 PERCENT...OF
BECOMING A TROPICAL CYCLONE DURING THE NEXT 48 HOURS AND A HIGH
CHANCE...70 PERCENT...OF BECOMING A TROPICAL CYCLONE DURING THE
NEXT 5 DAYS. THIS SYSTEM IS FORECAST TO MOVE VERY SLOWLY
WEST-NORTHWESTWARD...PRODUCING HEAVY RAINS OVER EASTERN MEXICO FOR
THE NEXT SEVERAL DAYS.


0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#222 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:19 pm

Land interaction will likely be the decider for intensity. If it moves north and stays away from land for an extended period, I see no reason why we won't have Hurricane Ingrid, perhaps even the first major of 2013.

Have models trended south or do they still weaken the ridge?

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

TheStormExpert

Re:

#223 Postby TheStormExpert » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:26 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:Land interaction will likely be the decider for intensity. If it moves north and stays away from land for an extended period, I see no reason why we won't have Hurricane Ingrid, perhaps even the first major of 2013.

Have models trended south or do they still weaken the ridge?

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

They have trended south today.
0 likes   

User avatar
TropicalAnalystwx13
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Age: 27
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

Re:

#224 Postby TropicalAnalystwx13 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:26 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:Land interaction will likely be the decider for intensity. If it moves north and stays away from land for an extended period, I see no reason why we won't have Hurricane Ingrid, perhaps even the first major of 2013.

Have models trended south or do they still weaken the ridge?

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

NAVGEM sends this towards Texas, GFS is into northern Mexico. I'd say the chances of a USA landfall have decreased since yesterday though. Doesn't mean southern Texas can't see impacts.

This is shaping up to be a bad situation for Mexico. Given the favorable upper air environment and established mid-level vortex that may work down to the surface before even emerging into the Bay of Campeche (onshore flow is diverted eastward just onshore which helps strengthen the southern side of circulations [one of the reasons why once TD 2...Barry...'s circulation became better defined over land]) this should have no problem developing very rapidly in the Bay of Campeche. The chances of this becoming a hurricane are quite high, if you ask me.

But I've been wrong before.
0 likes   

User avatar
Rgv20
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2466
Age: 38
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Edinburg/McAllen Tx

Re: Re:

#225 Postby Rgv20 » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:33 pm

TropicalAnalystwx13 wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:Land interaction will likely be the decider for intensity. If it moves north and stays away from land for an extended period, I see no reason why we won't have Hurricane Ingrid, perhaps even the first major of 2013.

Have models trended south or do they still weaken the ridge?

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

NAVGEM sends this towards Texas, GFS is into northern Mexico. I'd say the chances of a USA landfall have decreased since yesterday though. Doesn't mean southern Texas can't see impacts.

This is shaping up to be a bad situation for Mexico. Given the favorable upper air environment and established mid-level vortex that may work down to the surface before even emerging into the Bay of Campeche (onshore flow is diverted eastward just onshore which helps strengthen the southern side of circulations [one of the reasons why once TD 2...Barry...'s circulation became better defined over land]) this should have no problem developing very rapidly in the Bay of Campeche. The chances of this becoming a hurricane are quite high, if you ask me.

But I've been wrong before.


The only problem I see with 93L becoming a hurricane is the broad nature of this system but if it get going it can rapidly intensify (Ex: Hurricane Alex 2010)
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

TheStormExpert

#226 Postby TheStormExpert » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:50 pm

New Video Discussion by Tropical Tidbit's Levi Cowan:
Storm Likely to Form in SW Gulf of Mexico – Will Threaten Mexico and Possibly Southern Texas
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/blog/2013/09/11/storm-likely-to-form-in-sw-gulf-of-mexico-will-threaten-mexico-and-possibly-southern-texas/
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145299
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 50% - 70%

#227 Postby cycloneye » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:54 pm

00z Best Track.

AL, 93, 2013091200, , BEST, 0, 185N, 898W, 25, 1007, DB
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145299
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 50% - 70%

#228 Postby cycloneye » Wed Sep 11, 2013 7:57 pm

Is now moving WNW at 285 degrees. This movement seals the deal about emerging to the water instead of staying overland.

LATCUR = 18.5N LONCUR = 89.8W DIRCUR = 285DEG SPDCUR = 6KT
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 50% - 70%

#229 Postby HouTXmetro » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:22 pm

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/gmex/flash-wv.html

Correct me if i'm wrong. Check out the water Vapor Loop. Is that an ULL forming or weakening in the SW Gulf/BOC. It also seems to be one over Texas and another near the Florida Panhandle region. I'm wondering what influence might these features have on 93L. Perhaps that's the reason why some of the models keep the feature in the BOC for a while.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

caneman

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 50% - 70%

#230 Postby caneman » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:22 pm

Any chance that Northern part takes over? We'll see if it holds together.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 50% - 70%

#231 Postby Dean4Storms » Wed Sep 11, 2013 9:31 pm

cycloneye wrote:Is now moving WNW at 285 degrees. This movement seals the deal about emerging to the water instead of staying overland.

LATCUR = 18.5N LONCUR = 89.8W DIRCUR = 285DEG SPDCUR = 6KT



I was about to post that the lower level spin over the Yucatan is gaining latitude tonight big time. It might even be more like 290 degree's.
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 50% - 70%

#232 Postby tailgater » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:08 pm

Very unimpressive tonite. A good deal of shear right now.

Image
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 50% - 70%

#233 Postby HouTXmetro » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:21 pm

Does anyone think chances may be lowered in next update? I know convection usually diminishes this time of night but it looks like shear is having an impact now as tailgator said.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 50% - 70%

#234 Postby ConvergenceZone » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:23 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:Does anyone think chances may be lowered in next update? I know convection usually diminishes this time of night but it looks like shear is having an impact now as tailgator said.



could be. Of course a slower development increases the chance of a Mexico landfall....If it were to spin up real quick, then Texas might be under the gun.....
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 50% - 70%

#235 Postby HouTXmetro » Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:39 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:Does anyone think chances may be lowered in next update? I know convection usually diminishes this time of night but it looks like shear is having an impact now as tailgator said.



could be. Of course a slower development increases the chance of a Mexico landfall....If it were to spin up real quick, then Texas might be under the gun.....


Conversely I'd argue slower development gives the "coc" a better chance of relocating further North, that's assuming it slows down.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 50% - 70%

#236 Postby TheStormExpert » Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:55 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:Does anyone think chances may be lowered in next update? I know convection usually diminishes this time of night but it looks like shear is having an impact now as tailgator said.



could be. Of course a slower development increases the chance of a Mexico landfall....If it were to spin up real quick, then Texas might be under the gun.....


Conversely I'd argue slower development gives the "coc" a better chance of relocating further North, that's assuming it slows down.

The slower it develops the more likely Texas will be threatened, the quicker it develops the more likely Mexico will be threatened.
0 likes   

supercane4867
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4966
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 50% - 70%

#237 Postby supercane4867 » Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:23 am

SUBJ/TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION ALERT//
WTNT21 KNGU 112300
RMKS/
1. FORMATION OF A SIGNIFICANT TROPICAL CYCLONE IS POSSIBLE WITHIN
100 NM EITHER SIDE OF A LINE FROM 18.3N 89.3W TO 19.1N 93.1W
WITHIN THE NEXT 12 TO 24 HOURS. AVAILABLE DATA DOES NOT JUSTIFY
ISSUANCE OF NUMBERED TROPICAL CYCLONE WARNINGS AT THIS TIME.
WINDS IN THE AREA ARE ESTIMATED TO BE 20 TO 25 KNOTS.
2. REMARKS: CURRENT MODEL GUIDANCE IS SUGGESTING INTENSIFICATION OF
A TROPICAL DISTURBANCE THAT IS OVER THE YUCATAN PENINSULA,
APPROXIMATELY 608NM SOUTHEAST OF BROWNSVILLE, TX. THIS SYSTEM IS
MOVING WEST-NORTHWESTWARD AT APPROXIMATELY 5 TO 10 KNOTS. SATELLITE
IMAGERY INDICATES THAT THE FEATURE REMAINS ORGANIZED IN THE MID-
LEVELS OF THE ATMOSPHERE BUT NO SURFACE CIRCULATION IS APPARENT AT
THIS TIME. THE UPPER LEVEL ENVIRONMENT REMAINS FAVORABLE FOR RAPID
DEVELOPMENT ONCE THE DISTURBANCE EMERGES OVER THE BAY OF CAMPECHE
WITHIN 12 TO 24 HOURS. SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURES OF 85 TO 87 DEGREES
WILL FURTHER AID IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS TROPICAL FEATURE.
3. THIS ALERT WILL BE REISSUED, UPGRADED TO WARNING OR CANCELLED
BY 122300Z.//
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4225
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 50% - 70%

#238 Postby South Texas Storms » Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:46 am

NHC 1 am TWO: 60% - 80%

"SHOWER AND THUNDERSTORM ACTIVITY ASSOCIATED WITH A BROAD AREA OF LOW
PRESSURE NEAR THE WEST COAST OF THE YUCATAN PENINSULA IS CURRENTLY
DISORGANIZED. HOWEVER...SURFACE PRESSURES ARE FALLING ACROSS THIS
REGION...AND THE LOW IS EXPECTED TO ENTER THE BAY OF CAMPECHE LATER
TODAY WHERE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ARE EXPECTED TO BE CONDUCIVE
FOR DEVELOPMENT. THIS DISTURBANCE IS LIKELY TO BECOME A TROPICAL
CYCLONE DURING THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS AS LONG AS IT REMAINS FAR
ENOUGH OFFSHORE. THIS SYSTEM HAS A HIGH CHANCE...60 PERCENT...OF
BECOMING A TROPICAL CYCLONE DURING THE NEXT 48 HOURS AND A HIGH
CHANCE...80 PERCENT...OF BECOMING A TROPICAL CYCLONE DURING THE
NEXT 5 DAYS WHILE IT MOVES SLOWLY WEST-NORTHWESTWARD. LOCALLY HEAVY
RAINS ARE POSSIBLE OVER A LARGE PART OF EASTERN MEXICO IN
ASSOCIATION WITH THIS SYSTEM DURING THE NEXT SEVERAL DAYS...AND
THESE RAINS COULD CAUSE LIFE-THREATENING FLASH FLOODS AND MUD
SLIDES."
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

#239 Postby Hammy » Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:51 am

I don't think I've seen a TCFA issued before for a system still over land.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11496
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion - 50% - 70%

#240 Postby GCANE » Thu Sep 12, 2013 4:00 am

The ULL over Georgia's Atlantic coast will likely create a poleward outflow channel once this gets out over the water.

http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~ovens/loops/wxloop.cgi?wv_east_enhanced+24
Last edited by GCANE on Thu Sep 12, 2013 4:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests