A question about the WPAC

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3538
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

A question about the WPAC

#1 Postby Extratropical94 » Mon Sep 30, 2013 2:54 pm

Mainly to the mods and/or admins on here,
I've been wondering if there are any rules or official statements concerning the "official" agency responsible for the Western Pacific "typhoon" basin.
Lately I've witnessed that two separate factions seem to coexist on this board, one favoring the JTWC and the other one favoring the JMA.
This is especially visible when it comes to statistics ("4th typhoon has formed"..."no it's still a STS, we only had 2 typhoons this season"...) or naming the threads.
For example, the Pabuk thread had it as a typhoon despite JMA never upgrading it to one.
Same thing with southern hemisphere storm numbering (R, U & F vs. S & P)...

I can understand both sides for various reasons (official agency, higher accuracy, better estimations and forecasts etc.) so I'd like to know if guidelines exist or what everyone thinks about that topic.
0 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22979
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: A question about the WPAC

#2 Postby wxman57 » Mon Sep 30, 2013 3:07 pm

I believe that the JMA is the "official" agency of the West Pacific, though JTWC does issue its own advisories. Both agencies appear to be somewhat lacking in their abilities to determine development and intensification. I recall that earlier this year, the JTWC had two typhoons move within 150NM of each other such that their tropical storm force wind fields would have mixed together. It was like two forecasters each made a forecast for a storm, not taking into account the forecast for the second storm. Both JTWC and JMA are often way late in declaring a depression/storm has formed, and they seem to have a hard time estimating intensity.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145358
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: A question about the WPAC

#3 Postby cycloneye » Mon Sep 30, 2013 3:12 pm

Since Storm2k was created,we have gone with JMA as the official agency. I know that JMA is slow many times upgrading but we stick with it. :roll:
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

#4 Postby 'CaneFreak » Mon Sep 30, 2013 4:18 pm

In my opinion, JTWC is the best because they have no specialty in one general area like the JMA was designed specifically for the Tokyo/Japan area. However, the forecasts for neither agency have proven to be all that accurate to be honest. Resources are extremely limited in this part of the world.
0 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

#5 Postby Yellow Evan » Mon Sep 30, 2013 7:22 pm

The JMA is the official RMSC for the WPAC, so therefore, official.
0 likes   

euro6208

Re: A question about the WPAC

#6 Postby euro6208 » Mon Sep 30, 2013 8:50 pm

JTWC provides more in depth analysis and uses 1 min average winds just like NHC.

Better and less confusing. :D
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#7 Postby Alyono » Mon Sep 30, 2013 8:54 pm

Lets just say the JTWC performance has not been up to par. . The 2 typhoons within 50 NM of each other was a mistake that even a 13 year old would know wouldn't occur.

I really think the issue with JTWC is lack of forecaster experience due to military rotations. I wonder how they would improve if they went with a permanent forecast staff?
0 likes   

Typhoon Hunter
WesternPacificWeather.com
WesternPacificWeather.com
Posts: 1221
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:37 am
Location: Tokyo
Contact:

Re: A question about the WPAC

#8 Postby Typhoon Hunter » Mon Sep 30, 2013 9:31 pm

Yup, JMA's the official agency so should be used for titles of threads etc, not sure who titled Pabuk as a typhoon. Remember JTWC is one of many other agencies in this basin along with HKO, CMA, CWB, PAGASA, KMA so I suggest following the local agency closest whenever a storm nears that region ie I always use CWB for tracking Taiwan landfalls. For some reason JTWC seems to be the media's darling agency.

I'll admit if you're not a regular Wpac follower it can be confusing! :D
0 likes   
James - Documenting tropical cyclones...

http://www.youtube.com/TyphoonHunter

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#9 Postby RL3AO » Mon Sep 30, 2013 9:40 pm

Storm2k will always use the RSMC for thread titles. Now the JTWC will always be a popular source because its in the form we are most familiar with (1-min winds, 120 hour forecast, ect).
0 likes   

euro6208

Re: A question about the WPAC

#10 Postby euro6208 » Mon Sep 30, 2013 9:49 pm

Typhoon Hunter wrote:Yup, JMA's the official agency so should be used for titles of threads etc, not sure who titled Pabuk as a typhoon. Remember JTWC is one of many other agencies in this basin along with HKO, CMA, CWB, PAGASA, KMA so I suggest following the local agency closest whenever a storm nears that region ie I always use CWB for tracking Taiwan landfalls. For some reason JTWC seems to be the media's darling agency.

I'll admit if you're not a regular Wpac follower it can be confusing! :D


JTWC did the right call in upgrading and was most closest to reality whereas JMA kept calling it a Severe Tropical Storm. :roll: Good thing the thread was changed or else they would look really stupid.
0 likes   

Typhoon Hunter
WesternPacificWeather.com
WesternPacificWeather.com
Posts: 1221
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:37 am
Location: Tokyo
Contact:

#11 Postby Typhoon Hunter » Tue Oct 01, 2013 1:16 am

I agree Euro, I believe JMA hugely underestimated Pabuk too, but this board has rules for a reason and RL3AO stated them clearly above. The beauty of this forum is we can go on to discuss why we agree or disagree with what the various professional government agencies are saying.

I think the one thing we all agree on though is we need regular damn recon out here as soon as possible!! :D
0 likes   
James - Documenting tropical cyclones...

http://www.youtube.com/TyphoonHunter

User avatar
ManilaTC
WesternPacificWeather.com
WesternPacificWeather.com
Posts: 593
Age: 47
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:13 am
Location: Mandaluyong City, Philippines
Contact:

Re: A question about the WPAC

#12 Postby ManilaTC » Sat Oct 26, 2013 10:31 pm

supercane4867 wrote:I prefer JTWC more often simply beacuse it makes more sense compare to others

CMA HKO PAGASA = amateur agencies


-- Just an observation, JTWC tends to make forecasts "closer" to US Military assets... it was created for the US Military anyway ehehe.
-- Mentioning CMA, HKO, PAGASA and the other agencies as "amateur" is kinda downgrading in the sense that with the agencies having years and years of experience in a region with the most TC's per year, will not consider them amateurish at all. All agencies have their own share of shortcomings.
0 likes   
The above post is NOT official and should not be used as such. It is my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. Please refer to your official national weather agency.

WEB http://goo.gl/JDiKXB | FB https://goo.gl/N5sIle | @ManilaTC

User avatar
ManilaTC
WesternPacificWeather.com
WesternPacificWeather.com
Posts: 593
Age: 47
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:13 am
Location: Mandaluyong City, Philippines
Contact:

Re:

#13 Postby ManilaTC » Sat Oct 26, 2013 10:33 pm

Typhoon Hunter wrote:I agree Euro, I believe JMA hugely underestimated Pabuk too, but this board has rules for a reason and RL3AO stated them clearly above. The beauty of this forum is we can go on to discuss why we agree or disagree with what the various professional government agencies are saying.

I think the one thing we all agree on though is we need regular damn recon out here as soon as possible!! :D


How about a WestPac wide rally for the return RECON!... or else it will still be known to be a name for a NERF GUN. :ggreen:
0 likes   
The above post is NOT official and should not be used as such. It is my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. Please refer to your official national weather agency.

WEB http://goo.gl/JDiKXB | FB https://goo.gl/N5sIle | @ManilaTC

User avatar
mrbagyo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3725
Age: 33
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
Location: 14.13N 120.98E
Contact:

Re: A question about the WPAC

#14 Postby mrbagyo » Sun Oct 27, 2013 5:57 am

ClarkEligue wrote:How about a WestPac wide rally for the return RECON!... or else it will still be known to be a name for a NERF GUN. :ggreen:


there's a feasibility study for that... just google this >> Tropical Cyclone Reconnaissance over the Western North Pacific with the Global Hawk by RE. Atkinson III
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.

Meow

#15 Postby Meow » Sun Nov 03, 2013 11:34 am

I wonder why many people only prefer JTWC. This center ignores Yutu, underestimates Usagi and Lekima, and it even takes the dying Krosa as a typhoon. JMA follows WMO’s suggestion on 10-minute maximum sustained winds, provides more beautiful maps, and releases best track data much earlier. Many people in this forum never respect the Japan Meteorological Agency which also contributes all information about the 2011 earthquake off the Pacific coast of Tōhoku.
0 likes   

euro6208

Re:

#16 Postby euro6208 » Sun Nov 03, 2013 12:11 pm

Meow wrote:I wonder why many people only prefer JTWC. This center ignores Yutu, underestimates Usagi and Lekima, and it even takes the dying Krosa as a typhoon. JMA follows WMO’s suggestion on 10-minute maximum sustained winds, provides more beautiful maps, and releases best track data much earlier. Many people in this forum never respect the Japan Meteorological Agency which also contributes all information about the 2011 earthquake off the Pacific coast of Tōhoku.


well for one thing, JTWC is more popular because it is what we are most familiar and comfortable with 1-min winds, 120 hour forecast ect just like what residents of the western hemisphere gets with NHC.

JTWC also releases their best track but that is after a comprehensive look at each storm after each season. Much more exciting...

If you think JTWC like you say underestimates Usagi and Lekima at 140 knots, what makes you think JMA did best with their peak at 110/115 knot 10 min average when they struggle more without recon EVERY YEAR?

JMA likes to upgrade low pressure areas into a TD even though data doesn't support it but with stronger storms aka typhoons, they have difficulty as their dvorak scale makes their intensity weaker and weaker even at 8.0 only at 122 knots compared to 170 knots 1 min average by both JTWC and NHC...

EVERY YEAR?

i love earthquakes but isn't related to any tropical weather but there might be a teleconnection but i don't know.

Well i hope one day we have recon here in the WPAC and hope all agencies uses 1 min averages just to be less confusing. :D
0 likes   

User avatar
xtyphooncyclonex
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3861
Age: 23
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:07 am
Location: Cebu City
Contact:

Re: Re:

#17 Postby xtyphooncyclonex » Mon Nov 04, 2013 3:42 am

euro6208 wrote:
Meow wrote:I wonder why many people only prefer JTWC. This center ignores Yutu, underestimates Usagi and Lekima, and it even takes the dying Krosa as a typhoon. JMA follows WMO’s suggestion on 10-minute maximum sustained winds, provides more beautiful maps, and releases best track data much earlier. Many people in this forum never respect the Japan Meteorological Agency which also contributes all information about the 2011 earthquake off the Pacific coast of Tōhoku.


well for one thing, JTWC is more popular because it is what we are most familiar and comfortable with 1-min winds, 120 hour forecast ect just like what residents of the western hemisphere gets with NHC.

JTWC also releases their best track but that is after a comprehensive look at each storm after each season. Much more exciting...

If you think JTWC like you say underestimates Usagi and Lekima at 140 knots, what makes you think JMA did best with their peak at 110/115 knot 10 min average when they struggle more without recon EVERY YEAR?

JMA likes to upgrade low pressure areas into a TD even though data doesn't support it but with stronger storms aka typhoons, they have difficulty as their dvorak scale makes their intensity weaker and weaker even at 8.0 only at 122 knots compared to 170 knots 1 min average by both JTWC and NHC...

EVERY YEAR?

i love earthquakes but isn't related to any tropical weather but there might be a teleconnection but i don't know.

Well i hope one day we have recon here in the WPAC and hope all agencies uses 1 min averages just to be less confusing. :D


10-minute winds are more accurate because they tend to be more realistic, and you did not see the DIFFERENCES WITH THE DVORAK SCALE. I am not trying to offend you, but your interpretation. 10-minutes and 1-minute winds have a huge difference, OK?

215 km/h was the CORRECT windspeed for me - Lekima. Usagi looked even like a 195 km/h storm. See

Speaking about low-pressure TD's, can you even recall the time that JTWC DID NOT RECOGNIZE the September 2009 Depression in Vietnam? Vietnam had terrible floods. Do you even remember Bising early this year? It was organized ENOUGH yet not even a TD per the JTWC!

I will take JMA's side.
0 likes   
REMINDER: My opinions that I, or any other NON Pro-Met in this forum, are unofficial. Please do not take my opinions as an official forecast and warning. I am NOT a meteorologist. Following my forecasts blindly may lead to false alarm, danger and risk if official forecasts from agencies are ignored.

User avatar
xtyphooncyclonex
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3861
Age: 23
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:07 am
Location: Cebu City
Contact:

#18 Postby xtyphooncyclonex » Mon Nov 04, 2013 3:48 am

Speaking about Rumbia... I was wrong before about it being a typhoon. In fact, despite having an eye, its structure wasn't that good for a 10-min typhoon.

But Pabuk really SHOULD be a typhoon!

At least JMA isn't as bad as most agencies...
0 likes   
REMINDER: My opinions that I, or any other NON Pro-Met in this forum, are unofficial. Please do not take my opinions as an official forecast and warning. I am NOT a meteorologist. Following my forecasts blindly may lead to false alarm, danger and risk if official forecasts from agencies are ignored.

User avatar
xtyphooncyclonex
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3861
Age: 23
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:07 am
Location: Cebu City
Contact:

#19 Postby xtyphooncyclonex » Mon Nov 04, 2013 9:38 am

euro6208 - You also have to respect the JMA. We are not AMERICANS!
0 likes   
REMINDER: My opinions that I, or any other NON Pro-Met in this forum, are unofficial. Please do not take my opinions as an official forecast and warning. I am NOT a meteorologist. Following my forecasts blindly may lead to false alarm, danger and risk if official forecasts from agencies are ignored.

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29113
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: A question about the WPAC

#20 Postby vbhoutex » Tue Nov 05, 2013 12:40 am

Enough of the childish back and forth concerning the agencies. It must stop now. I am speaking to anyone in this discussion who has disrespectfully expressed negative opinions about these agencies or each other. We do not allow this and it is made clear in our rules. If this continues staff has been instructed to start handing out suspensions as a reminder to abide by the rules of the site.

As previously stated JMA is the official agency of choice for STORM2K. Discussion using JTWC information of course is allowed, but we use JMA as the official agency.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AnnularCane, Google [Bot], IsabelaWeather, TomballEd and 25 guests