Yellow Evan wrote:Raymond looking really nice atm. Not sure if it'll RI though.
Yes, it looks really good. MJO and Kelvin-wave are giving it a little push. I'll post an image later.

Moderator: S2k Moderators
Yellow Evan wrote:Raymond looking really nice atm. Not sure if it'll RI though.
Yellow Evan wrote:Trivial, but Raymond 83 and 89 were both Cat 4's during the EPAC dynasty era of the 80's and early 90's. Also weird how this naming list is the first to get to R since 1989. That's impr4essive IMO, and almost makes up for the lack of major's IMO.
cycloneye wrote:18z Best Track up to 55kts.
EP, 17, 2013102018, , BEST, 0, 151N, 1019W, 55, 997, TS, 50, NEQ, 20, 20, 0, 0, 1008, 150, 20, 0, 0, E, 0, , 0, 0, RAYMOND, M,
supercane4867 wrote:TXPZ25 KNES 201828
TCSENP
A. 17E (RAYMOND)
B. 20/1745Z
C. 15.1N
D. 101.9W
E. THREE/GOES-E
F. T3.5/3.5/D2.0/24HRS
G. IR/EIR/VIS/WINDSAT
H. REMARKS...RAYMOND CONTINUES TO DEVELOP RAPIDLY WITH LLCC FIRMLY
EMBEDDED WITHIN DENSE OVERCAST WITH SPIRAL DEEP CONVECTIVE BANDS WRAPPING
COMPLETELY AROUND. 10 TENTHS BANDING GIVES DT=3.5. MET=3.0 BASED ON 24
HR RAPID DEVELOPMENT TREND. PT=3.5. FT IS BASED ON DT.
I. ADDL POSITIONS
20/1236Z 14.7N 101.5W WINDSAT
...RUMINSKI
12Z ECMWF down to 957mb
http://i.imgur.com/319waR8.png
RainbowAppleJackDash wrote:supercane4867 wrote:TXPZ25 KNES 201828
TCSENP
A. 17E (RAYMOND)
B. 20/1745Z
C. 15.1N
D. 101.9W
E. THREE/GOES-E
F. T3.5/3.5/D2.0/24HRS
G. IR/EIR/VIS/WINDSAT
H. REMARKS...RAYMOND CONTINUES TO DEVELOP RAPIDLY WITH LLCC FIRMLY
EMBEDDED WITHIN DENSE OVERCAST WITH SPIRAL DEEP CONVECTIVE BANDS WRAPPING
COMPLETELY AROUND. 10 TENTHS BANDING GIVES DT=3.5. MET=3.0 BASED ON 24
HR RAPID DEVELOPMENT TREND. PT=3.5. FT IS BASED ON DT.
I. ADDL POSITIONS
20/1236Z 14.7N 101.5W WINDSAT
...RUMINSKI
12Z ECMWF down to 957mb
http://i.imgur.com/319waR8.png
Do you think Ray would be our first major? Or do you think something else?
DA DISCLAIMER!
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
hurricanes1234 wrote:Best looking TS ever!
hurricanes1234 wrote:Based on that eye, this could already be a hurricane. Let's hope it remains offshore. What is the more likely scenario? Landfall or a Dalila-like storm that comes within miles of the coast but stays over water?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests