6 hour motion 265-wsw

#1 Postby **Vortex** » Thu Sep 11, 2003 9:59 pm

There is no question that the 6 hour average motion is 265 or so. The movement through 2:15utc has been wsw. Not a wobble.

#2 Postby **Vortex** » Thu Sep 11, 2003 9:59 pm

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html

wrkh99 · #3 Postby **wrkh99** » Thu Sep 11, 2003 10:00 pm

Yep WSW ! Someone on this board was talking about that motion for days !

Who was that person ?

Tommedic · #4 Postby **Tommedic** » Thu Sep 11, 2003 10:09 pm

Looks like a wobble based on last 2 frames.

calidoug · #5 Postby **calidoug** » Thu Sep 11, 2003 10:20 pm

Last 2 frames-- jump to the NW.

ColdFront77 · #6 Postby **ColdFront77** » Fri Sep 12, 2003 2:32 am

wrkh99 wrote:Yep WSW ! Someone on this board was talking about that motion for days !

Who was that person ?

I mentioned it, not sure if you remember it being me.

I also said that tropical cyclones tend to move WSW for even a very brief period of time [during there life moving W or WNW over the Atlantic into the Caribbean Sea].

WeatherNLU · #7 Postby **WeatherNLU** » Fri Sep 12, 2003 2:40 am

Between the satillite gap (0345Z to 0615Z) it moved more WNW than anything.

.10N and .34W

ColdFront77 · #8 Postby **ColdFront77** » Fri Sep 12, 2003 3:08 am

There was more of a southerly component during Thursday evening.

WeatherNLU · #9 Postby **WeatherNLU** » Fri Sep 12, 2003 3:17 am

In my opinion, there was a wobble, there was NO southerly component.

AussieMark · #10 Postby **AussieMark** » Fri Sep 12, 2003 3:22 am

I think it was more a deviation that the actual track.

ColdFront77 · #11 Postby **ColdFront77** » Fri Sep 12, 2003 3:43 am

WeatherNLU wrote:In my opinion, there was a wobble, there was NO southerly component.

tropicalweatherwatcher wrote:I think it was more a deviation that the actual track.

I agree with both of you.

6 hour motion 265-wsw

6 hour motion 265-wsw

link-doubt needed but

Yup-- wobble

Who is online