TeamPlayersBlue wrote:Imagine it could actually be colder than progged too if GFS continues to underestimate the cold
Or, maybe, it will be warmer than the GFS is indicating!
Moderator: S2k Moderators
TeamPlayersBlue wrote:Imagine it could actually be colder than progged too if GFS continues to underestimate the cold
dhweather wrote:Well, there's one positive from sub-freezing weather with NO precip nor any hope of it. DIE BUGS DIE!
Lagreeneyes03 wrote:dhweather wrote:Well, there's one positive from sub-freezing weather with NO precip nor any hope of it. DIE BUGS DIE!
YES! I've never in my life seen so many gnats. Cant even open the windows on the days it did get unseasonably warm because they come through the screen. They are all over my area today. This, after the frigid temps a few weeks ago.
What will it take to kill them off??
weatherguy425 wrote:Not that I find the 0Z GFS operational output probable, but boy, talk about transient.
BigB0882 wrote:What does transient mean in weather terms? lol
weatherguy425 wrote:BigB0882 wrote:What does transient mean in weather terms? lol
12z Run:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/18/jtnk.png/
00z Run:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/827/uq7s.png/
The main trough (big dip in the jet stream) on the 00z GFS, the most recent run, is deeper but also more progressive. Both images above are valid for the same time period (next Monday evening), just different forecast 'runs'. According to tonight's 00z run, the cold air-mass would be very short-lived, and easily eroded along the Rockies and Central Plains - at leas with the first 'batch'. Of course, the odds of the run verifying to a 'T', are slim to none.
TheProfessor wrote:[
How long has the cold air been building? Or has it not start building yet.
Rgv20 wrote::uarrow: January 1962 holds the official all time record low temperature for Rio Grande City of 10F! Not enough data for RGC in 1899 but I read that the best guess is a low of 7F if I recall correctly.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests