dhweather wrote:For example, Texas had major hear and drought problems in the 50's, the AMO was +, some of the best cold weather the US has seen was in the 70's and 80's, the AMO was - , forward to Y2K, Texas has been back warmer than normal with major droughts again, the AMO is +
That doesn't truly explain the 1800s when it was far colder than anything we saw in modern times. And you have to look at the cold blasts themselves, they are all associated with a tanking -EPO in the Pacific not Atlantic. 1989 was overall not a cold winter, 83 was so so after the pacific unloaded and went positive, as was 77<- this one had a powerful warm pool, and 78. The AMO like PDO is a background pattern and is something you use on a decadal scale, not seasonally, for averages and yearly precipitation. But that is a good thinking on your part

You can check out the daily EPO here. Some dates to find is Christmas time 83, 89, late Jan 85, Mid Jan 94, Feb 94, earlier this season, Feb 11, Jan 61, Jan 62. It is to unbelievable the correlation. And then check out 2011-12, we had a couple of negative bumps in Mid Jan and a little in Feb, then just positives as far as the eye can see.
ftp://ftp.cdc.noaa.gov/Public/gbates/teleconn/epo.reanalysis.t10trunc.1948-present.txt