Texas Winter 2013-2014

Winter Weather Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
ndale
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 429
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:12 am
Location: Pflugerville/Austin Tx

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5241 Postby ndale » Sun Jan 26, 2014 4:56 pm

Portastorm wrote:Just read the afternoon AFD out of EWX. Another head scratcher to me. They mention less precip for this coming event than the last one, yet the GFS is showing higher qpf values for this event than it did for the last one. They also mention an all-rain precip event during Tuesday 11 am-7 pm! Whaaa??!! All of the GFS grid numbers show temps in the AUS-SAT area at or below freezing during the day. Very strange.

It's an ultra conservative approach to be sure. Hey look, I wasn't expecting a Blizzard Watch out of them but I certainly wasn't expecting this either. Oh well.


Really! Their quote, "PRECIPITATION WILL BE MORE SCATTERED AND LIGHTER THAN THE EVENT LAST WEEK." Where are they getting that info. I have no confidence in that forecast at all.
0 likes   
Any opinions stated are those of an amateur, please take with several grains of salt and for official forecast refer to the National Weather Service.

User avatar
hriverajr
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 786
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:16 am

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5242 Postby hriverajr » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:00 pm

18z GFS does show the baja system moving much farther south and dampening out. Gives central Texas not nearly as much action.
0 likes   

ndale
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 429
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:12 am
Location: Pflugerville/Austin Tx

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5243 Postby ndale » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:03 pm

hriverajr wrote:18z GFS does show the baja system moving much farther south and dampening out. Gives central Texas not nearly as much action.



Thanks for a clarification, EWX didn't give any details of where they got their info. Will see what later runs show.
0 likes   
Any opinions stated are those of an amateur, please take with several grains of salt and for official forecast refer to the National Weather Service.

Jagno
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 825
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 10:40 pm
Location: SW Louisiana

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5244 Postby Jagno » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:11 pm

All of this uncertainty makes it so difficult to plan ahead as a business owner. I have 38 employees to consider and most have to cross bridges or overpasses to get to work. It's simply not worth putting their lives at risk on icy roadways. Last weeks storm left them stranded when the bridges and overpasses suddenly closed. Two people were killed in our city. You'd think that less than 48 hours out they'd be able to tell us about when to expect hazardous conditions. We were thinking of opening up and just closing at 2pm but now I'm seeing conflicting reports of when the system will reach our area.
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5245 Postby Portastorm » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:20 pm

ndale wrote:
hriverajr wrote:18z GFS does show the baja system moving much farther south and dampening out. Gives central Texas not nearly as much action.



Thanks for a clarification, EWX didn't give any details of where they got their info. Will see what later runs show.


ndale, they weren't basing their forecast off 18z data. That comes in too late prior to their issuance of the afternoon AFD.
0 likes   
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.

User avatar
Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 22894
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

#5246 Postby Ntxw » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:22 pm

18z NAM has very little if much for Texas. 18z GFS is the better route at least compared to the NAM.
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

  Help support Storm2K!
Help Support Storm2K

ndale
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 429
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:12 am
Location: Pflugerville/Austin Tx

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5247 Postby ndale » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:24 pm

Portastorm wrote:
ndale wrote:
hriverajr wrote:18z GFS does show the baja system moving much farther south and dampening out. Gives central Texas not nearly as much action.



Thanks for a clarification, EWX didn't give any details of where they got their info. Will see what later runs show.


ndale, they weren't basing their forecast off 18z data. That comes in too late prior to their issuance of the afternoon AFD.


You're right, hadn''t thought of that, then I have to ask again what were they looking at?
0 likes   
Any opinions stated are those of an amateur, please take with several grains of salt and for official forecast refer to the National Weather Service.

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5248 Postby Portastorm » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:27 pm

Wntrwthrguy wrote:
Portastorm wrote:Just read the afternoon AFD out of EWX. Another head scratcher to me. They mention less precip for this coming event than the last one, yet the GFS is showing higher qpf values for this event than it did for the last one. They also mention an all-rain precip event during Tuesday 11 am-7 pm! Whaaa??!! All of the GFS grid numbers show temps in the AUS-SAT area at or below freezing during the day. Very strange.

It's an ultra conservative approach to be sure. Hey look, I wasn't expecting a Blizzard Watch out of them but I certainly wasn't expecting this either. Oh well.


Porta, what would you say your confidence level is heading into this possible weather event compared to the same timeframe to last week's?


I'd say I'm a little less confident in a winter weather event for Austin than I was at this time prior to the event last week. Why? The 12z and 18z model trends are a bit concerning. And it is hard to argue the trend that this ULL may traverse across Mexico a little deeper than previous thought. That being said, I look at the 21z SREF (short term ensemble forecasts which are usually pretty good) and even the NCEP maps precip totals from 18z and I see anywhere from .10 to .25 precip for Austin. Last week's event only yield .08" and look what happened?! So, I'm thinking ... maybe, just maybe.

I do think our friends in South and Southeast Texas are much more primed for better action than our area.

Hope I can stay awake for the 0z runs tonight. :wink:
0 likes   
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9492
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5249 Postby ROCK » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:32 pm

18Z NAM is further south with the ULL shearing it out over MX... We will see what the 0Z runs say. Might be right giving less precip to central Texas or even SE TX for that matter...
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#5250 Postby HouTXmetro » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:34 pm

Lucy is making her appearance
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5251 Postby Portastorm » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:38 pm

Speaking of making appearances, our West Coast "friend" is making his right now.

http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/geo/index.php?satellite=west&channel=wv&coverage=nh&file=gif&imgoranim=8&anim_method=flash
0 likes   
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.

BigB0882
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2284
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

Re:

#5252 Postby BigB0882 » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:39 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:Lucy is making her appearance


Don't speak that name!!!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
hriverajr
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 786
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 12:16 am

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5253 Postby hriverajr » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:41 pm

You can see the upper low off of California, looks a little small to me... it better intensify or else....
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5254 Postby Portastorm » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:43 pm

And by the way, here's a good read for ALL of us with regards to the best models to follow so far. This is from the afternoon model diagnostics discussion out of the NWS/NOAA national weather desk in College Park, Maryland. They're liking the GFS and I've told y'all that I thought the GFS did really well last week, at least for my part of the woods.


BROAD SHORTWAVE DIGGING INTO THE SOUTHERN PLAINS/LOWER MS VALLEY
POTENTIAL ICE STORM FOR THE GULF COAST REGION
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PREFERENCE: 12Z GFS / 00Z CMC BLEND
CONFIDENCE: BELOW AVERAGE

THERE ARE STILL SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES REGARDING A BROAD
SHORTWAVE...EXPECTED TO AMPLIFY SOUTHWARD ACROSS THE
CENTRAL/SOUTHERN PLAINS AND MISSISSIPPI VALLEY ON TUE INTO
WED...WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR A MAJOR ICE STORM ALONG THE GULF
COAST INTO THE SOUTHEAST. THE 12Z NAM IS ONE EXTREME OF THE
SPREAD...AS THE SLOWEST AND DEEPEST TO DIG THE TROUGH SOUTH
RESULTING IN WIDESPREAD SN/PL/FZRA FROM THE GULF COAST TO THE
SOUTHEASTERN U.S. COASTLINE. THE 12Z UKMET IS THE OTHER EXTREME
WITH A FLATTER/QUICKER UPPER TROUGH PROGRESSION WHICH VERY LITTLE
WINTER PRECIP FOR THE SOUTH.

TRENDS IN THE ENSEMBLE SPAGHETTI HEIGHT PLOTS SUPPORT A SOLUTION
IN THE MIDDLE WITH THE GFS TRENDING TOWARD THIS MIDDLE
CONSENSUS...ALONG WITH VERY SLOW SHIFTS TOWARD THIS IDEA FROM THE
ECMWF/UKMET AS WELL...INCLUDING THEIR 12Z CYCLES. THE 00Z CMC HAS
A SIMILAR IDEA OF THE 12Z GFS...BUT A BIT LESS SHARP WITH THE
SHORTWAVE TROUGH AS IT MOVES ACROSS THE OHIO VALLEY ON WED. GIVEN
THE FASTER SHIFT IN THE 12Z CMC AND DIFFERENCES ACROSS THE NRN
MEXICO REGION REGARDING THE ABOVE SYSTEM...A BLEND OF THE 12Z GFS
/ 00Z CMC CONTINUES TO BE PREFERRED WITH LIMITED CONFIDENCE DUE TO
THE LARGER THAN AVERAGE SPREAD FOR A DAY 2/3 SYSTEM
0 likes   
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.

Wntrwthrguy
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 161
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 8:48 pm
Location: North Austin

#5255 Postby Wntrwthrguy » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:49 pm

I have little to no knowledge on what to look for when looking at different models, so I'm hoping someone can explain to me what to look at. When looking at twisterdata.com, I am looking at snowfall depth on both the 18z GFS and NAM. Both are showing at least some snowfall amounts for south central Texas.
0 likes   
Any post should not be taken as a forecast. I am just an amateur living the dream.

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23077
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5256 Postby wxman57 » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:56 pm

Interesting 18Z GFS meteogram for Houston. About 2-4" snow and a low Wed of 17, and that's just 2m temps. MOS will probably be colder:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
perk
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:35 am
Location: Richmond Texas

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5257 Postby perk » Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:02 pm

wxman57 wrote:Interesting 18Z GFS meteogram for Houston. About 2-4" snow and a low Wed of 17, and that's just 2m temps. MOS will probably be colder:

http://home.comcast.net/~cgh57/iahgfs18zjan26.gif


Would'nt that prolong the icing that may occur Tuesday night.
0 likes   

Kennethb
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 506
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:15 am
Location: Baton Rouge

Re:

#5258 Postby Kennethb » Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:02 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:Lucy is making her appearance


Patty: Try to catch snowflakes on your tongue. It's fun.
Linus Van Pelt: Mmm. Needs sugar.
Lucy Van Pelt: It's too early. I never eat December snowflakes. I always wait until January.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5259 Postby HouTXmetro » Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:03 pm

wxman57 wrote:Interesting 18Z GFS meteogram for Houston. About 2-4" snow and a low Wed of 17, and that's just 2m temps. MOS will probably be colder:

http://home.comcast.net/~cgh57/iahgfs18zjan26.gif


How likely is that to verify in precip amounts and that 17? What are you thoughts on the latest model "trends"?
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

Snowman67
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 633
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 12:44 pm
Location: Tomball, TX

Re:

#5260 Postby Snowman67 » Sun Jan 26, 2014 6:04 pm

Ntxw wrote:18z NAM has very little if much for Texas. 18z GFS is the better route at least compared to the NAM.


Just did a meteogram for Tomball, TX (just NW of Houston) and it actually shows more precipitation here and colder temps than the 12Z GFS.
0 likes   
Any forecast I make is based on my opinion only. Please refer to the NWS or NHC for official forecasts.


Return to “Winter Weather”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests