Texas Winter 2013-2014

Winter Weather Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
frank92171
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:35 pm
Location: Marrero,la

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5681 Postby frank92171 » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:37 pm

Can you elaborate on why dew point is so important? New to this and would like to understand better what we are looking for. Thanks
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4245
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5682 Postby South Texas Storms » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:37 pm

The baloon launch here in CLL is scheduled for 6z tonight.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9492
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re:

#5683 Postby ROCK » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:38 pm

Ntxw wrote:To me the surface temperature isn't that important. What I want to know is how did the balloon launch from Tamu and UH do? Would like to see what the temperature profile is above which is far more critical.



UH is tomorrow at 11am I believe....I got one of my kids birthday balloons....let me tie my weather station to it. Hang on... :cheesy:
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 32
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

Re:

#5684 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:38 pm

Ntxw wrote:To me the surface temperature isn't that important. What I want to know is how did the balloon launch from Tamu and UH do? Would like to see what the temperature profile is above which is far more critical.

Texas A&M launches after 10:30 tonight.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

weatherguy425
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX > Lubbock, TX > Savannah, GA
Contact:

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5685 Postby weatherguy425 » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:38 pm

Ntxw wrote:To me the surface temperature isn't that important. What I want to know is how did the balloon launch from Tamu and UH do? Would like to see what the temperature profile is above which is far more critical.


I may be wrong - BUT - I don't believe the launch, at least at UH, will occur until mid-morning tomorrow. Wxman was chatting about it at KHOU. Reasoning was that column would be different by tomorrow morning anyway, so, delayed launch until it was 'crunch-time'.
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5686 Postby Portastorm » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:39 pm

0z GFS rolling in and it looks a LOT like the 0z NAM ... big depature from previous runs. Like the 0z NAM, upper level energy is further north and more progressive as compared to previous runs. Almost looks too fast. It shears out the low quickly as compared to previous runs which kept ULL more intact/compact.
0 likes   
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.

BigB0882
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2284
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5687 Postby BigB0882 » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:39 pm

frank92171 wrote:Can you elaborate on why dew point is so important? New to this and would like to understand better what we are looking for. Thanks


Take a look at Janie2006's post in the Deep South thread. I would copy and paste but not without their permission.
0 likes   

User avatar
TeamPlayersBlue
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3462
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:44 am
Location: Denver/Applewood, CO

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5688 Postby TeamPlayersBlue » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:41 pm

Portastorm wrote:0z GFS rolling in and it looks a LOT like the 0z NAM ... big depature from previous runs. Like the 0z NAM, upper level energy is further north and more progressive as compared to previous runs.



:)
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

BigB0882
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2284
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5689 Postby BigB0882 » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:41 pm

Portastorm wrote:0z GFS rolling in and it looks a LOT like the 0z NAM ... big depature from previous runs. Like the 0z NAM, upper level energy is further north and more progressive as compared to previous runs. Almost looks too fast. It shears out the low quickly as compared to previous runs which kept ULL more intact/compact.


Oh I hope you are right and I hope it maintains the better look all the way through the run so we all can hope for more FUN!
0 likes   

User avatar
Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 22894
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5690 Postby Ntxw » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:44 pm

Portastorm wrote:0z GFS rolling in and it looks a LOT like the 0z NAM ... big depature from previous runs. Like the 0z NAM, upper level energy is further north and more progressive as compared to previous runs. Almost looks too fast. It shears out the low quickly as compared to previous runs which kept ULL more intact/compact.


But it has about the same qpf up to 0.10 inch for most of SE Texas, a little less for the northern areas than the 12z run.
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

  Help support Storm2K!
Help Support Storm2K

frank92171
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:35 pm
Location: Marrero,la

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5691 Postby frank92171 » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:44 pm

BigB0882 wrote:
frank92171 wrote:Can you elaborate on why dew point is so important? New to this and would like to understand better what we are looking for. Thanks


Take a look at Janie2006's post in the Deep South thread. I would copy and paste but not without their permission.


Sorry, I just saw it in that thread. Thanks for the answer. Kinda understand better.
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5692 Postby Portastorm » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:45 pm

BigB0882 wrote:
Portastorm wrote:0z GFS rolling in and it looks a LOT like the 0z NAM ... big depature from previous runs. Like the 0z NAM, upper level energy is further north and more progressive as compared to previous runs. Almost looks too fast. It shears out the low quickly as compared to previous runs which kept ULL more intact/compact.


Oh I hope you are right and I hope it maintains the better look all the way through the run so we all can hope for more FUN!


What I'm taking away from this GFS run is that clearly the Mexican system wasn't sampled well. And some of that upper level energy is going to end up much closer to Texas. And as I said earlier, the early outbreak of precip in the Hill Country, well west of where it was supposed to start, should show us that the precip chances for SC and SE Texas are more enhanced than what earlier models showed. Probably also due to this system having some connection with Pacific jet moisture. I'd shudder to start guessing about actual QPF/accumulation amounts but clearly it's looking much better than it did 6 hours ago even.
0 likes   
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5693 Postby Portastorm » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:46 pm

Ntxw wrote:
Portastorm wrote:0z GFS rolling in and it looks a LOT like the 0z NAM ... big depature from previous runs. Like the 0z NAM, upper level energy is further north and more progressive as compared to previous runs. Almost looks too fast. It shears out the low quickly as compared to previous runs which kept ULL more intact/compact.


But it has about the same qpf up to 0.10 inch for most of SE Texas, a little less for the northern areas than the 12z run.


I saw that and as I just wrote, I'm not buying it. It's early precip predictions don't even match with what's going on in the Hill Country. The takeway is models didn't capturre system well and it's going to be further north.
0 likes   
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.

User avatar
Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 22894
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5694 Postby Ntxw » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:48 pm

Portastorm wrote:
Ntxw wrote:
Portastorm wrote:0z GFS rolling in and it looks a LOT like the 0z NAM ... big depature from previous runs. Like the 0z NAM, upper level energy is further north and more progressive as compared to previous runs. Almost looks too fast. It shears out the low quickly as compared to previous runs which kept ULL more intact/compact.


But it has about the same qpf up to 0.10 inch for most of SE Texas, a little less for the northern areas than the 12z run.


I saw that and as I just wrote, I'm not buying it. It's early precip predictions don't even match with what's going on in the Hill Country. The takeway is models didn't capturre system well and it's going to be further north.


They do have reflectivity in the hill country. There's stuff falling yes but there is no qpf equivalent to measure it by to say the model was wrong. Trace doesn't count as it right now.
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.



  Help support Storm2K!

Help Support Storm2K


Wntrwthrguy
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 161
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 8:48 pm
Location: North Austin

#5695 Postby Wntrwthrguy » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:48 pm

Starting to sprinkle/drizzle here in hutto, just north of austin. Looks like it's going to be a long night! :cold:
0 likes   
Any post should not be taken as a forecast. I am just an amateur living the dream.

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4245
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5696 Postby South Texas Storms » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:49 pm

Portastorm wrote:
BigB0882 wrote:
Portastorm wrote:0z GFS rolling in and it looks a LOT like the 0z NAM ... big depature from previous runs. Like the 0z NAM, upper level energy is further north and more progressive as compared to previous runs. Almost looks too fast. It shears out the low quickly as compared to previous runs which kept ULL more intact/compact.


Oh I hope you are right and I hope it maintains the better look all the way through the run so we all can hope for more FUN!


What I'm taking away from this GFS run is that clearly the Mexican system wasn't sampled well. And some of that upper level energy is going to end up much closer to Texas. And as I said earlier, the early outbreak of precip in the Hill Country, well west of where it was supposed to start, should show us that the precip chances for SC and SE Texas are more enhanced than what earlier models showed. Probably also due to this system having some connection with Pacific jet moisture. I'd shudder to start guessing about actual QPF/accumulation amounts but clearly it's looking much better than it did 6 hours ago even.


I agree Porta and this frequently happens due to the models not sampling the system well while it's over Mexico. Btw are you getting any precip currently? Radar shows some echoes over Austin.
0 likes   

ndale
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 429
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:12 am
Location: Pflugerville/Austin Tx

#5697 Postby ndale » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:50 pm

Finally getting some sprinkles here.
0 likes   
Any opinions stated are those of an amateur, please take with several grains of salt and for official forecast refer to the National Weather Service.

BigB0882
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2284
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5698 Postby BigB0882 » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:52 pm

Portastorm wrote:
Ntxw wrote:
Portastorm wrote:0z GFS rolling in and it looks a LOT like the 0z NAM ... big depature from previous runs. Like the 0z NAM, upper level energy is further north and more progressive as compared to previous runs. Almost looks too fast. It shears out the low quickly as compared to previous runs which kept ULL more intact/compact.


But it has about the same qpf up to 0.10 inch for most of SE Texas, a little less for the northern areas than the 12z run.


I saw that and as I just wrote, I'm not buying it. It's early precip predictions don't even match with what's going on in the Hill Country. The takeway is models didn't capturre system well and it's going to be further north.


I like you Porta. :) I am rooting for you to be dead on.
0 likes   

User avatar
Janie2006
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1329
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: coastal Ms aka home of the hurricanes

#5699 Postby Janie2006 » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:53 pm

Meh. No worries. I didn't come up with the theory. If so, I'm owed a lot of accolades and a department chair at some swanky meteorology department. :P
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4245
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Texas Winter 2013-2014

#5700 Postby South Texas Storms » Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:54 pm

Darn the evening AFD update from HGX says I don't have much chance of snow accumulations tonight. I thought this evening's trends were looking good for me...

".UPDATE...
A SERIES OF SHORTWAVE DISTURBANCES MOVING ACROSS MEXICO WILL
ULTIMATELY BE THE SPARK THAT INITIATES WHATEVER LIFT WILL GENERATE
TUESDAY PRECIPITATION. WHILE NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO TRACK THE
PROGRESSION...OR DOWNSTREAM EVOLUTION...OF ENHANCED OMEGA/PVA
PRODUCED BY THESE WEAK WAVES THEY ARE NEVERTHELESS A MARKER TO TRACK
OR FOLLOW. TONIGHT'S UPDATES WERE TO TEMPS/POPS/WX THROUGH EARLY
WEDNESDAY NIGHT...MORE OF AN ADJUSTMENT. FOR POPS HAVE BLENDED THE
00Z NAM AND THE 12Z WRF (ARW) OF SWATHING HIGH CHANCE/LOW QPF UP
NORTH DURING THE MORNING...TRANSITIONING THIS FURTHER SOUTHEAST
TOWARDS THE COAST THROUGH THE LATE MORNING INTO EARLY AFTERNOON
HOURS. PRECIPITATION TYPE WILL BEGIN AS LIGHT RAIN OR SPRINKLES
BEFORE DAWN...TURNING OVER TO A WINTER MIX OF EITHER FREEZING RAIN
OR LIGHT SLEET ALONG AND NORTH THE HIGHWAY 105 CORRIDOR THROUGH THE
MORNING. THIS PRECIP TYPE WILL SPREAD TOWARDS THE COAST FROM MID-
LATE AM THROUGH EARLY AFTERNOON. CURRENT TEMPERATURES ARE RELATIVELY
WARM BUT...JUST UPSTREAM... TEMPS/DEW POINTS ARE BELOW
FREEZING/SINGLE DIGITS. THIS LOWER LAYER DRY AIR FILTERING IN MAY
THWART PRE-DAWN PRECIPITATION. THERE SHOULD BE ENOUGH SATURATION
FROM PACIFIC MOISTURE HIGH ENOUGH INTO THE UPPER LAYERS TOMORROW
MORNING FOR ICE CRYSTALS/ SUPERCOOLED DROPLETS TO PARTIALLY MELT
WITHIN A WARMER 5-10K FT LAYER...THEN PARTIALLY RE-FREEZE INTO SLEET
IN THE LOWER 5K FT. ROADWAYS MAY BECOME WET WITH EARLY DAY DRIZZLE
OR VERY LIGHT RAIN...THEN FREEZE THROUGH THE DAY. ICE FORMING ON
ELEVATED ROADS AND BRIDGES WILL BE THE MAIN IMPACT FOR TRAVEL
TOMORROW. ALL AND ALL...CURRENT THINKING IS THAT THIS EVENT WILL
UNFOLD SIMILAR TO FRIDAY'S EVENT. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS THAT THERE
APPEARS TO BE LESS NORTHERN SNOW ACCUMULATION AND THERE MAY BE MORE
OF A SOUTHERN FORECAST AREA SLEET/ICE PROBLEM GOING INTO THE LATE
AFTERNOON INTO EARLY EVENING HOURS. 31"
0 likes   


Return to “Winter Weather”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests