Moving West
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
Moving West
Is it just me or the storm is moving more west then wnw and maybe the WNW was a wobble
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Chase...go to the GHCC site... http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/post-goes and look at the 1km IR loop. Go back about 10 frames and zoom into the eye on high. I like this site because it gives 15 minute pics...sometimes 5 minute pics. You don't have to wait 30 minutes. When you get the loop....you can see the WNW motion over the last 2 hours. There was a wobble to the west a couple of hours ago. Remember a couple of days ago when you got wobbles to the SW but overall west motion? Now you have WNW with an occasional to the west. It is eyewall trochodial motions that cause it. If you had a spinning top that was not perfectly balanced...you would get the same effect.
Again...look at the GHCC site. Excellet shots...15 minutes pics...good zooms. Chose the north american IR middle top. The whole storm isn't in the pic...but for motion all you need is the eye.
Again...look at the GHCC site. Excellet shots...15 minutes pics...good zooms. Chose the north american IR middle top. The whole storm isn't in the pic...but for motion all you need is the eye.
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT ... -loop.html
have to factor the wobbles to the west as well for an overall motion.
have to factor the wobbles to the west as well for an overall motion.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2003 9:46 pm
- Location: Palm Bay, Florida
- Contact:
This is a good water vapor loop... I see a wnw movement on this one.
http://www.goes.noaa.gov/HURRLOOPS/huwvloop.html
http://www.goes.noaa.gov/HURRLOOPS/huwvloop.html
0 likes
Is there somebody here who could interpret this steering wind pattern and how it relates to the future direction? Thanks
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... 8dlm3.html
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... 8dlm3.html
0 likes
"As that low heads further e it will enclose that gap fulfilling the ridge [what the heck does that mean?]..."
Weatherman182001, What do you base that statement on? None of the models, nor any credible meterologists, are suggesting WSW movement in the future.
The storm has turned to the WNW. Why deny that? What do you have invested in a W to WSW track?
Weatherman182001, What do you base that statement on? None of the models, nor any credible meterologists, are suggesting WSW movement in the future.
The storm has turned to the WNW. Why deny that? What do you have invested in a W to WSW track?
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
I think it has made the turn WNW as I though it would this morning (see "More concern for Florida" Thread"). I am almost certain that any jogs to the WSW are done...westward jogs may happen...but will become more and more rare. The WNW motion has begun and I think cali may be right...looking at the sat...it may be a little north of WNW. Unfortunately you can't get the motion for the vortex fixes because the eye is so large and the center is swirling around in there...and the lowest pressure is not staying right in the middle of the storm.
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
calidoug wrote:"As that low heads further e it will enclose that gap fulfilling the ridge [what the heck does that mean?]..."
Weatherman182001, What do you base that statement on? None of the models, nor any credible meterologists, are suggesting WSW movement in the future.
The storm has turned to the WNW. Why deny that? What do you have invested in a W to WSW track?
So if the models don't agree it is not credible? Most meterologists will just report what the NHC anyhow.
I can have my opinions and have based it with proof. Something few have done.
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
Weatherman:"This is an excellent view. As that low heads further e it will enclose that gap fulfilling the ridge and making Isabel have no choice but to move west or even wsw."
THis is not the low that will pull the storm. It is the trough that is coming. There will be no more west or WSW movements...I would bet on that. Bet...anyone..anyone
holds out maxed out credit cards....
THis is not the low that will pull the storm. It is the trough that is coming. There will be no more west or WSW movements...I would bet on that. Bet...anyone..anyone

0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
I think what calidoug and I are asking is what is the proof? All the models disagree. You have to have some real solid proof to disagree with all the avialable models. Even the toilet paper models are now in agreement (those are the ones I only print out when I run out of paper).
What is the meteorological reasoning? What is going to cause the ridge to not orient N/S and why is the trough not going to dig into the eastern GOM in 72-96 hours?
What is the meteorological reasoning? What is going to cause the ridge to not orient N/S and why is the trough not going to dig into the eastern GOM in 72-96 hours?
0 likes