FASCINATING Paper on Large-Eyed (Annular) Hurricanes

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Derecho
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 3:15 pm

FASCINATING Paper on Large-Eyed (Annular) Hurricanes

#1 Postby Derecho » Sat Sep 13, 2003 3:49 pm

http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/~kossin/articl ... arhurr.pdf

(Note, this is a PDF file, you will need Adobe's free Acrobat Reader to view.)

It's a technical academic paper, but 75% will be understandable to a serious weather enthusiast that isn't a meterologist.

Basically:

1) Isabel right now meets the classic criteria of an annular hurricane in every respect, it seems

2) Isabel would seem to be the strongest annular hurricane ever recorded

3) The key aspect of annular hurricanes is they seem to take MUCH longer to weaken than a normal hurricane of the same intensity.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve Cosby
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 525
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 6:49 pm
Location: Northwest Arkansas

Interesting...

#2 Postby Steve Cosby » Sat Sep 13, 2003 4:08 pm

This is interesting but this statement is present regarding the identification of annular 'canes:

the hurricane has a normal-to-large-sized circular eye surrounded by a single band of deep convection containing the inner-core region and 2) the hurricane has little or no convective activity beyond this annulus of convection.


Is that the case here? Is the "inner corse" the first few kilometers or could it be the entire body of the convection. The feeder bands don't seem to be as identifiable or they don't seem to be as independent.
0 likes   

calidoug
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 480
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:13 pm

#3 Postby calidoug » Sat Sep 13, 2003 4:28 pm

Wow, amazing article.

Great pictures.

Isabel looks *just* like the pics of the annular hurricanes listed.

In fact, I think I remember a few days ago, before the eye got large, that it went through a similar 'cold air intrusion' which resulted in the larger eye... wish I could find a real long-term IR loop...

Doug
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#4 Postby Air Force Met » Sat Sep 13, 2003 4:30 pm

Bump for later
0 likes   

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

#5 Postby PTrackerLA » Sat Sep 13, 2003 4:34 pm

Like calidoug said, Isabel looks JUST like the pictures of annular hurricanes. It's really an odd and freaky looking storm on the IR.
0 likes   

calidoug
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 480
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:13 pm

BUMP!

#6 Postby calidoug » Sat Sep 13, 2003 5:23 pm

This paper really is interesting.

One wonders if the folks at the NHC are aware?

Perhaps this is why they were surprised to find it still a CAT 5...

These annular guys maintain their intensity much longer than normal, apprently, and don't always have the super-coldest IR cloud tops even when they're still intense.

Got to love the "mixmaster 5" eddies whirling around in there today again.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve Cosby
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 525
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 6:49 pm
Location: Northwest Arkansas

Annular Canes

#7 Postby Steve Cosby » Sun Sep 14, 2003 11:13 am

I shot off an email to Bastardi asking "what do you think of this?" after seeing this thread last night. He responded this morning with:

it will expand and be weaker, simply because of the pattern


I think it is clear the 'cane will be weaker for a number of reasons but the expansion part is frightening. If annular hurricanes maintain intensity longer, it follows that Isabel will still be quite strong despite the weakening which is (likely correctly) forecast. Secondly, that strength will be spread out over a larger area in the end rather than the tight signature found in "classic" hurricanes.

Obviously, this is more theoretical but it will be something to watch.

Going along with wxman57's signature line (observe the pattern), note the "pattern" part of Bastardi's response.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bigpapa, Blown Away, Brent, HurricaneBelle, Ian2401, TomballEd and 56 guests