West wobble or not?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
West wobble or not?
there has been a west movement for the last hour or so does this mean we could have a west movement again I think more then likely is a wobble
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
To be honest...it depends. If the NHC is forecasting a WNW motion...then usually it only has to go 1 or 2 hours and then it is a true movement...if they are forecasting a westward motion and it is moving north...then it could move that way for 6 hours and they will still call it "overall to the west"
Usually 6-12 hours and then they will take the average. The problem with taking wobbles and making them movements is in intense storms wobbles happens all the time. If you have a top...take a piece of gum and put it on one side a spin the top. It wobbles when it moves. Some with the hurricane. It is an off balance tire..wobbling as it moves.

Usually 6-12 hours and then they will take the average. The problem with taking wobbles and making them movements is in intense storms wobbles happens all the time. If you have a top...take a piece of gum and put it on one side a spin the top. It wobbles when it moves. Some with the hurricane. It is an off balance tire..wobbling as it moves.
0 likes
- Steve Cosby
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 6:49 pm
- Location: Northwest Arkansas
Funny
Air Force Met wrote:To be honest...it depends. If the NHC is forecasting a WNW motion...then usually it only has to go 1 or 2 hours and then it is a true movement...if they are forecasting a westward motion and it is moving north...then it could move that way for 6 hours and they will still call it "overall to the west"
Funny!

0 likes
Good explainationAir Force Met wrote:To be honest...it depends. If the NHC is forecasting a WNW motion...then usually it only has to go 1 or 2 hours and then it is a true movement...if they are forecasting a westward motion and it is moving north...then it could move that way for 6 hours and they will still call it "overall to the west"
Usually 6-12 hours and then they will take the average. The problem with taking wobbles and making them movements is in intense storms wobbles happens all the time. If you have a top...take a piece of gum and put it on one side a spin the top. It wobbles when it moves. Some with the hurricane. It is an off balance tire..wobbling as it moves.


0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
It may be moving west know but lets face it, it will turn to the wnw to nw eventually. This is the same thing that happened with Fabian until he eventually turned. The G-IV data will true up the models but they have been doing pretty well without it. Just about every model is forecasting the turn. They may not agree on a landfall point but they all agree on a turn. That consensus is too hard to ignore.
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
You might want to refresh your loop Stormcenter. I've got a 20-23z loop going at 15 minute intervals with the latest one at 2301z...and it is 285. There is no west motion there. There was a wobble last hour...maybe that was the one pic you saw. You cannot take trochodial motions and call them movements.Go to GHCC and take a 12 image loop of the 1 km IR and you will see that there is no westward motion. Zoom in on medium or high click on the center of the storm in the image.
http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/post-goes
http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/post-goes
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
- Steve Cosby
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 6:49 pm
- Location: Northwest Arkansas
Cloud Tops are Warming?
Air Force Met wrote:Sorry...bad link...go here instead:
http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/goeseastconusir.html
Cloud tops seem to be warming? Going through an eyewall replacement cycle, maybe?
0 likes
-
- Military Met
- Posts: 4372
- Age: 56
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
- Location: Roan Mountain, TN
- Stormsfury
- Category 5
- Posts: 10549
- Age: 53
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 6:27 pm
- Location: Summerville, SC
Air Force Met wrote:That and some lower HHP's thanks to Fabian. Tomorrow it should hit some high HHP and SST tomorrow and go through another cycle tomorrow. It will probably hit 5 again if that upper low gets out of the way and doesn't shear it any.
If Isabel hits CAT 5 status after weakening back (which it's looking quite clear that it has done so), this would match Allen for reaching CAT 5 status three times. The HHP and SST's tomorrow are quite frightening. SST's don't get any cooler for a while after that.
SF
0 likes
- Steve Cosby
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 6:49 pm
- Location: Northwest Arkansas
Maximum Potention
Stormsfury wrote:If Isabel hits CAT 5 status after weakening back (which it's looking quite clear that it has done so), this would match Allen for reaching CAT 5 status three times. The HHP and SST's tomorrow are quite frightening. SST's don't get any cooler for a while after that.
This is an interesting link as proof (as if you guys needed more proof). I've watched it for a while and it has pretty well predicted both Fabian and Isabel in terms of intensity.
http://grads.iges.org/pix/hurpot.html
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Blown Away, Google Adsense [Bot], HurricaneFan, Ulf and 34 guests