WPAC: RAMMASUN - Post-Tropical
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4966
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am
Re: WPAC: RAMMASUN - Typhoon
The Chinese media and government agencies have really done a horrible job on this one, they failed to advise or evacuate major towns and cities in the landfall region even at the final approach of a super typhoon.
Most people in Haikou were still out to work yesterday
Most people in Haikou were still out to work yesterday
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22950
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Re: WPAC: RAMMASUN - Typhoon
supercane4867 wrote:The lowest recorded pressure on Qizhou Islands is 892.3hPa while still falling after the 917.4hPa observation was taken **Not adjusted to sea level**
Depending on the exact altitude of station which is unknown for now, actual SLP likely ranged between 905hPa to 915hPa
9174 13:00:00
8923 14:16:00
9205 15:01:00
9412 16:01:00
9536 17:01:00
9581 18:01:00
9642 19:01:00
Where did you see the 892.3hPa pressure reading? Was it an official observing station? What is the 4-letter ICAO?
0 likes
Electricity is back just now!
Im from Lipa City, Batangas, PH and I think the eyewall passed over here
Wednesday 2:30 am I was already awake because of the strong winds and rain. Every hour winds kept getting stronger. I noticed occasional lightning and heard howling strong gusts of wind. Then it was around 5 am I was looking outside when suddenly air rushed in the room I was in. I was shocked to see our window gone. Wind and rain poured in. The intact windows were shaking. The whole room was shaking!!
I went downstairs and helped the others hold the other windows in danger of being blown off or destroyed. Daylight ensues. I saw the awning of our balcony destroyed. After 2 hours, the rain and winds were still strong. I looked outside and saw some of our neighbours' roofs blown away. The city is a mess. After 72 hours, electricity is back, just now! Just wanted to share my experience.
Im from Lipa City, Batangas, PH and I think the eyewall passed over here


0 likes
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4966
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am
Re: WPAC: RAMMASUN - Typhoon
wxman57 wrote:supercane4867 wrote:The lowest recorded pressure on Qizhou Islands is 892.3hPa while still falling after the 917.4hPa observation was taken **Not adjusted to sea level**
Depending on the exact altitude of station which is unknown for now, actual SLP likely ranged between 905hPa to 915hPa
9174 13:00:00
8923 14:16:00
9205 15:01:00
9412 16:01:00
9536 17:01:00
9581 18:01:00
9642 19:01:00
Where did you see the 892.3hPa pressure reading? Was it an official observing station? What is the 4-letter ICAO?
It is an unregistered automatic station that the data is available only in non-public networks for intergovernmental use. I got these numbers from a pro met in the chinese typhoon forum
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 143859
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Re: WPAC: RAMMASUN - Typhoon
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- weathernerdguy
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 188
- Age: 23
- Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:44 pm
About to make landfall
0 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:50 pm
Re: WPAC: RAMMASUN - Typhoon
^LOL they always have that in their final warning. Even for cyclones transitioning into an ET.. It's like their ending signature or something.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4966
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:43 am
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 264
- Age: 59
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:05 am
- Location: Ocean Springs, MS
Alyono, with all due respect even your own admission is that you had been bashing JTWC. However, I have found their forecasts to be Excellent throughout the life cycle of this typhoon. You cried foul when they forecast a typhoon for Philippines and admitted you busted your forecat. After landfall in Luzon you ridiculed JTWC for forecasting a major category 3 for Hainan, China. In fact their forecast was not strong enough. Now you are bashing them for relinquishing advisories on a system inland in south China and no longer a threat to US military or it's dependencies. I just don't understand why you have objected so much to what appears to have been a very fine forecast performance from them. I want to take this time to praise JTWC for their outstanding efforts in accurately forecasting this horrible cyclone!
0 likes
Re:
djones65 wrote:Alyono, with all due respect even your own admission is that you had been bashing JTWC. However, I have found their forecasts to be Excellent throughout the life cycle of this typhoon. You cried foul when they forecast a typhoon for Philippines and admitted you busted your forecat. After landfall in Luzon you ridiculed JTWC for forecasting a major category 3 for Hainan, China. In fact their forecast was not strong enough. Now you are bashing them for relinquishing advisories on a system inland in south China and no longer a threat to US military or it's dependencies. I just don't understand why you have objected so much to what appears to have been a very fine forecast performance from them. I want to take this time to praise JTWC for their outstanding efforts in accurately forecasting this horrible cyclone!
JT was HORRIBLE. It was not their forecasts that are the major concern, but their analysis. You CANNOT say something is 110 kts and 941mb when the DATA says around 960mb and about 90 kts.
The issue with the SCS was due to them forecasting a cat 3/4 for the wrong reasons. They were bringing the system into the SCS as a 2/3. It was a low end 1
The issue there is INEXPERIENCED forecasters who do 2-3 year tours of duty. One CANNOT be a good TC forecaster unless one not only has the educational background, but one also needs years of experience. If they had the experience, they would understand one CANNOT blindly use Dvorak estimates as JT is known to do.
As for ending advisories... they should end them as this is no interest to them. However, no need to say monitoring for regeneration. It's still a TC
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests