ATL: CRISTOBAL - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19990
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#541 Postby tolakram » Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:53 am

Canadian, yet another look at the two landfalls.

Image

Image
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#542 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:55 am

The HWRF will probably show a recurve out to sea now that a few models are trending towards it. :lol:
0 likes   

windnrain
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 670
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Baton Rouge

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#543 Postby windnrain » Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:56 am

Windshield wiper effect. We need something to actually form first.
0 likes   

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

#544 Postby northjaxpro » Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:56 am

Well, GEM back in line with the HWRF and CMC and UKMET, with GEM showing two peninsula Florida landfalls. These model runs are giving me a headache LOL...
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19990
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#545 Postby tolakram » Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:57 am

Canadian = CMC = GEM, unless I'm horribly mistaken.
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#546 Postby northjaxpro » Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:59 am

tolakram wrote:Canadian = CMC = GEM, unless I'm horribly mistaken.

I told you I am getting a headache. LOL. I had a FROPA of the brain there. You are right tolakram.
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#547 Postby blp » Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:04 pm

It is funny how the GFS has been chasing the CMC the last several runs. When the CMC goes one way then a run or two later the GFS shifts that way. It could be just a coincidence. Alonso is totally right though the models showing a stronger system are responding to the Ridge. I would expect the HWRF if it keeps the same intensity as before to stay put with a similar run.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

HURRICANELONNY
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1383
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 6:48 am
Location: HOLLYWOOD.FL

#548 Postby HURRICANELONNY » Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:06 pm

As I been saying all along. The models will not be reliable till it forms. As per Dr. Jeff Masters who says pretty much the same:

. A trough of low pressure is expected to be over the U.S. East Coast early next week, and the GFS and European models predict that this trough will be strong enough to turn 96L north and then northeast, keeping the storm away from the Southeast U.S. coast. However, long-range model forecasts of disturbances that haven't formed into a tropical depression yet are unreliable, and we should not be confident that 96L will miss the Mainland U.S. yet. In their 8 am EDT Thursday Tropical Weather Outlook, NHC gave the disturbance 2-day and 5-day development odds of 50% and 70%, respectively.
0 likes   
hurricanelonny

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#549 Postby blp » Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:07 pm

SFLcane wrote:FIM is recurving this now also. Would not surprise me if recon is a no go. Might not even develope at all.

[]http://fim.noaa.gov/FIM/for_web/fim_jet/2014082100/t6/wind_10m_f120.png[/img]


SFLCane you are looking at the FIM8 (30km) which is a lower resolution version of the the FIM if not mistaken. The FIM9 (15km) (Gatorcane graphic) which is the highest resoultion and thus the strongest keeps it west.
Last edited by blp on Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#550 Postby TheStormExpert » Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:09 pm

blp wrote:
SFLcane wrote:FIM is recurving this now also. Would not surprise me if recon is a no go. Might not even develope at all.

[]http://fim.noaa.gov/FIM/for_web/fim_jet/2014082100/t6/wind_10m_f120.png[/img]


SFLCane you are looking at the FIM8 which is a lower resolution version of the the FIM if not mistaken. The FIM9 (Gatorcane graphic) which is the highest resoultion and thus the strongest keeps it west.

Image please?
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22951
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#551 Postby wxman57 » Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:09 pm

I certainly would not pay any attention at all to the Canadian model. It's worthless for TCs. Odds are, 96L will pass near the eastern Bahamas then out to sea, east of the U.S. Coast. Could become a TS, but hurricane chances aren't high.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23689
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#552 Postby gatorcane » Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:11 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:
blp wrote:
SFLcane wrote:FIM is recurving this now also. Would not surprise me if recon is a no go. Might not even develope at all.

[]http://fim.noaa.gov/FIM/for_web/fim_jet/2014082100/t6/wind_10m_f120.png[/img]


SFLCane you are looking at the FIM8 which is a lower resolution version of the the FIM if not mistaken. The FIM9 (Gatorcane graphic) which is the highest resoultion and thus the strongest keeps it west.

Image please?


00Z FIM-9:
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#553 Postby blp » Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:14 pm

wxman57 wrote:I certainly would not pay any attention at all to the Canadian model. It's worthless for TCs. Odds are, 96L will pass near the eastern Bahamas then out to sea, east of the U.S. Coast. Could become a TS, but hurricane chances aren't high.



Do you subscribe to the idea stronger means further west in this scenario once it get's to the Bahamas? Thanks
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22951
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#554 Postby wxman57 » Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:15 pm

6Z FIM 9 recurves well east of Florida and is weaker..

Image
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6677
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#555 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:17 pm

Warning!!!!!!!! Model watching is for entertainment purposes only. IMO

:D
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22951
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#556 Postby wxman57 » Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:17 pm

blp wrote:
wxman57 wrote:I certainly would not pay any attention at all to the Canadian model. It's worthless for TCs. Odds are, 96L will pass near the eastern Bahamas then out to sea, east of the U.S. Coast. Could become a TS, but hurricane chances aren't high.



Do you subscribe to the idea stronger means further west in this scenario once it get's to the Bahamas? Thanks


Not now, with this disturbance. Look at the BAM models. BAMD recurves earliest, BAMS (shallow/weak) takes it farther west toward the Bahamas before recurving. This system isn't looking like much of a threat to anyone. Could become a TS as it begins recurving near the Bahamas, but then it should head out to sea.
0 likes   

stormlover2013

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#557 Postby stormlover2013 » Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:34 pm

Yeah and Ike was supposed to go out To sea also
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19990
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#558 Postby tolakram » Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:37 pm

stormlover2013 wrote:Yeah and Ike was supposed to go out To sea also


When?

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2008/graphics/al09/loop_5W.shtml
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6677
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#559 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:38 pm

Oh I remember Ike and yes he was suppose to go out to sea.



stormlover2013 wrote:Yeah and Ike was supposed to go out To sea also
0 likes   

hurrtracker79
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 94
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 1:32 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#560 Postby hurrtracker79 » Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:38 pm

How can anyone at this stage in the process (pro or amateur) say that this will recurve or hit land. We just do not know this far out. Our science cannot predict this with much accuracy 5-8 days out. Models are obviously having a very hard time with it. Lets just relax and watch how this unfolds. Many storms including IKE/IRENE were "supposed" to curve out to sea, but we know what the end results were. Track/intensity will not be known for a few more days folks.
0 likes   


Return to “2014”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests