ATL: CRISTOBAL - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- deltadog03
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 3580
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
- Location: Macon, GA
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6677
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models
I believe it was before he was actually was classified an organized system. Just like 96L.....but I'm NOT saying that's the case here so don't shoot me.
tolakram wrote:stormlover2013 wrote:Yeah and Ike was supposed to go out To sea also
When?
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2008/graphics/al09/loop_5W.shtml
0 likes
-
- Admin
- Posts: 19990
- Age: 61
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models
12Z Euro initialized


0 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
-
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 1:32 pm
Re:
deltadog03 wrote:I mean, everyone asks for wxman opinion and he gave it to yall. Why bring up Ike?? Whats brutally clear is that this is a weak mess and no GOOD models show this getting above anything but that, a weak mess that moves out to sea.
I think it is reasonable to discuss past systems that were in this area at this stage of the season. He was just pointing out that it has happened before where storms were modeled to take Path A, but took Path B. It is premature to believe anything the models show beyond 3 days. We all know that.
0 likes
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4201
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re:
NDG wrote:12z HWRF dissipitated 96L after 6 hrs, lol.
But then it shows it as a TS in the Bahamas in 90 hours.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models
hurrtracker79 wrote:How can anyone at this stage in the process (pro or amateur) say that this will recurve or hit land. We just do not know this far out. Our science cannot predict this with much accuracy 5-8 days out. Models are obviously having a very hard time with it. Lets just relax and watch how this unfolds. Many storms including IKE/IRENE were "supposed" to curve out to sea, but we know what the end results were. Track/intensity will not be known for a few more days folks.
They can't, but we can look at trends and the weather patterns (Water vapor sat as well). And out to sea is more likely than not, as is it not really getting too strong. But that doesn't mean it will do that.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 1:32 pm
Re:
Alyono wrote:every intense model is taking it farther west
However, the intense solution appears unlikely at this time. Instead, we may end up with a TD/weak TS heading out to sea or this fails to develop
Why do you think a more intense storm is unlikely? SST's are very warm near the Bahamas, plenty of fuel. Forecasted upper level conditions do not look too bad early next week. Just want your thoughts as to why it may not get its act together as it approaches the Bahamas. Thanks!
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models
Don't know if this is old but the HWRF still holding onto strong system on 12UTC


0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- meriland23
- Category 5
- Posts: 1239
- Age: 37
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models
Its way too soon to be like " yup, out to sea" or " yup, landfall". Its like trying to predict the color of your kids eyes and hair before they're even born.
0 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4201
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models
12z HWRF shows a cane hitting Miami in 120 hours. It's been pretty consistent with it's track.
0 likes
-
- Admin
- Posts: 19990
- Age: 61
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models
24h


0 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models
South Texas Storms wrote:12z HWRF shows a cane hitting Miami in 120 hours. It's been pretty consistent with it's track.
Wow that has my attention. so that intensity graphic was right borderline CAT3 in 132hrs.
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- StormingB81
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5676
- Age: 43
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:45 am
- Location: Rockledge, Florida
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models
blp wrote:South Texas Storms wrote:12z HWRF shows a cane hitting Miami in 120 hours. It's been pretty consistent with it's track.
Wow that has my attention. so that intensity graphic was right borderline CAT3 in 132hrs.
Is it still bringing it up through Tampa?
0 likes
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23689
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
HWRF was upgraded this past year and has done quite well in the Pacific plus I think it was more accurate than the GFS with Arthur. Not sure about Bertha.
Last edited by gatorcane on Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4201
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models
blp wrote:South Texas Storms wrote:12z HWRF shows a cane hitting Miami in 120 hours. It's been pretty consistent with it's track.
Wow that has my attention. so that intensity graphic was right borderline CAT3 in 132hrs.
No, that graphic showed what the 6z HWRF forecasted. The new 12z run shows it becoming a Category 1 hurricane.
0 likes
- Jevo
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1729
- Age: 47
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:45 pm
- Location: The Flemish Cap
- Contact:
Disregard was 6Z
Last edited by Jevo on Thu Aug 21, 2014 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Disclaimer: 50% of the time I have no clue of what I am talking about. Chances are I am taking a less than educated guess that sounds good because 10 years ago I stole Mike Watkins book 'The Hurricane and its Impact'. For official information please direct yourself to the NHC and their cadre of weather geniuses.
- meriland23
- Category 5
- Posts: 1239
- Age: 37
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models
South Texas Storms wrote:12z HWRF shows a cane hitting Miami in 120 hours. It's been pretty consistent with it's track.
HWRF is always consistent. Either consistent and wrong or consistent and right.
0 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests