ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
MississippiWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1696
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#401 Postby MississippiWx » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:30 pm

Upper level low to the south and east of 92L is helping to keep the air above 92L more divergent rather than convergent. You can see the high cirrus on the east side of 92L being pulled to the south and southeast rather than the southwest like the rest of the cirrus. This is just enough divergence aloft to keep the convection firing and to keep the shear from being deadly at the time being.
0 likes   
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

jhpigott
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 570
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:09 pm
Location: North Palm Beach, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#402 Postby jhpigott » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:32 pm

radar presentation doesn't look as good as it did earlier

http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?prod ... b&loop=yes
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5407
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#403 Postby chaser1 » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:34 pm

Just read the few posts that just came up as I was "one finger" typing my prior post above, LOL. I do think that if NHC were to upgrade this system to a depression, Storm Watches would have to be included in the package. It's not out of the question that an upgrade to TS could even occur, but taking account upper air conditions & the amount of time prior to moving ashore, i just don't think it likely. Regardless, this will be limited to being a flooding risk beyond anything else.
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23689
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#404 Postby gatorcane » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:34 pm

850MB vorticity quite strong:
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23689
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#405 Postby gatorcane » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:36 pm

jhpigott wrote:radar presentation doesn't look as good as it did earlier

http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?prod ... b&loop=yes


Still I am seeing some squalls building offshore Palm Beach, Martin, St. Lucie Counties that are swinging SW.

Wouldn't be surprised if NWS Miami and Melbourne start issuing some special marine warnings and coastal warnings as these squalls build.

They did mention the small chance of waterspouts in their hazardous weather outlook they issued earlier today.
Last edited by gatorcane on Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:40 pm, edited 7 times in total.
0 likes   

windnrain
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 670
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Baton Rouge

#406 Postby windnrain » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:36 pm

Some large thunderstorms building just to the low's west right off the coast of Florida in addition to the storms firing off directly over the center.
0 likes   

User avatar
tropicwatch
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3364
Age: 61
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
Location: Panama City Florida
Contact:

#407 Postby tropicwatch » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:42 pm

Busy radar, nice presentation of storm directions.

Image
0 likes   
Tropicwatch


Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#408 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:42 pm

gatorcane wrote:
jhpigott wrote:radar presentation doesn't look as good as it did earlier

http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?prod ... b&loop=yes


Still I am seeing some squalls building offshore Palm Beach, Martin, St. Lucie Counties that are swinging SW.

Wouldn't be surprised if NWS Miami and Melbourne start issuing some special marine warnings and coastal warnings as these squalls build.

They did mention the small chance of waterspouts in their hazardous weather outlook they issued earlier today.


MARINE WEATHER STATEMENT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MELBOURNE FL
243 PM EDT THU SEP 11 2014

AMZ555-575-112100-
243 PM EDT THU SEP 11 2014

...STRONG THUNDERSTORMS WELL OFFSHORE SOUTH OF VERO BEACH...

AT 235 PM EDT...NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE DOPPLER RADAR INDICATED
THUNDERSTORMS...PRODUCING STRONG WINDS NEAR 30 KNOTS...FROM 60 MILES
EAST OF VERO BEACH 30 MILES EAST OF JUPITER INLET..MOVING SOUTHWEST
AT 15 KNOTS.

MARINERS CAN EXPECT GUSTY WINDS UP TO 30 KNOTS...LOCALLY HIGHER
WAVES...AND LIGHTNING STRIKES. THERE IS SOME POTENTIAL FOR THESE
STORMS TO PRODUCE FUNNEL CLOUDS OR WATERSPOUTS. LISTEN FOR FURTHER
UPDATES AND POSSIBLE MARINE WARNINGS.

BOATERS SHOULD SEEK SAFE HARBOR IMMEDIATELY UNTIL THESE STORMS PASS.

LAT...LON 2697 7989 2697 7990 2709 7986 2752 7952
2769 7938 2771 7930 2732 7913 2698 7904
TIME...MOT...LOC 1840Z 060DEG 16KT 2748 7921 2692 7903
2690 7959

$$
0 likes   

TARHEELPROGRAMMER

#409 Postby TARHEELPROGRAMMER » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:42 pm

Anyone else seeing how large this thing is getting. It is getting quite impressive in displaying how to fire up convection. It must of heard me last night. Is it just me or is it building convection to the north of it as well. It looks like it is not in good conditions but still firing up not a good sign for the Gulf of Mexico residents.
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#410 Postby NDG » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:43 pm

92L about to go naked.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re:

#411 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:47 pm

NDG wrote:92L about to go naked.


Yup just about completely exposed. No way the NHC upgrades this unless the center can keep under the convection.
0 likes   

TARHEELPROGRAMMER

#412 Postby TARHEELPROGRAMMER » Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:58 pm

IT IS NAKED I SEE IT SOMEONE CALL THE COPS. It can get convection everywhere except the actual center lol. It is literally firing up convection everywhere BUT the center.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 41
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

#413 Postby Hammy » Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:05 pm

Still wouldn't write it off yet, convection is still very near the circulation, and we're approaching D-min as well.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7349
Age: 44
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re:

#414 Postby Hurricaneman » Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:06 pm

TARHEELPROGRAMMER wrote:IT IS NAKED I SEE IT SOMEONE CALL THE COPS. It can get convection everywhere except the actual center lol. It is literally firing up convection everywhere BUT the center.


That tends to happen in sheared systems and looking at forecasts the shear may not get much stronger but its 15 to 20kts which is quite disruptive to keeping convection at the center

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
0 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re:

#415 Postby blp » Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:07 pm

TARHEELPROGRAMMER wrote:IT IS NAKED I SEE IT SOMEONE CALL THE COPS. It can get convection everywhere except the actual center lol. It is literally firing up convection everywhere BUT the center.


Surprised to see you on here still, you said yesterday we should move on. Looks like you are not following your own advice. :P
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

TARHEELPROGRAMMER

Re: Re:

#416 Postby TARHEELPROGRAMMER » Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:09 pm

Hurricaneman wrote:
TARHEELPROGRAMMER wrote:IT IS NAKED I SEE IT SOMEONE CALL THE COPS. It can get convection everywhere except the actual center lol. It is literally firing up convection everywhere BUT the center.


That tends to happen in sheared systems and looking at forecasts the shear may not get much stronger but its 15 to 20kts which is quite disruptive to keeping convection at the center

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products


Yes but I will note that this system looks like it is building convection to the north of the center and closing convection all around it. The possibility is there and it already looks better than Arthur did as a TD JUST SAYING. Just only problem is the center is not in that convection IF it does get there though it will be a tropical storm.
0 likes   

TARHEELPROGRAMMER

Re: Re:

#417 Postby TARHEELPROGRAMMER » Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:10 pm

blp wrote:
TARHEELPROGRAMMER wrote:IT IS NAKED I SEE IT SOMEONE CALL THE COPS. It can get convection everywhere except the actual center lol. It is literally firing up convection everywhere BUT the center.


Surprised to see you on here still, you said yesterday we should move on. Looks like you are not following your own advice. :P


I am a weather nut myself and I was convinced yesterday this thing was done for. I however am a programmer and not a weatherman so just opinions of mine.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22951
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#418 Postby wxman57 » Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:13 pm

In the last hour or two, the weak LLC appears to have opened up a bit. Doesn't qualify for TD upgrade, as it lacks organized convection around the rather weak LLC. GFS & EC indicate weakening beyond 24-36 hrs as it crosses Florida and moves into the eastern Gulf. That seams reasonable.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#419 Postby Sanibel » Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:17 pm

:uarrow: I noticed that too. The shear is weakening the center. I'd suspect it would rebound over the Gulf Stream.
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#420 Postby NDG » Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:23 pm

Some of the squalls coming onshore near Sebastian Inlet.

Image
Image
0 likes   


Return to “2014”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests