xtyphooncyclonex wrote:gigabite wrote:xtyphooncyclonex wrote:Gigabite,
I remember you said something about the correlation if the New Moon and El Niño last year, that it will make a net positive SOI and correlation with its latitude. However we never got to see a positive SOI and has been consistently negative since June (Or Feb/March positive blip) You also said that we would see four more years of neutral, but we are currently having a multiyear or double El Niño event which proves your theory has poor verification, plus almost none of us understand that theory.
My hypothesis has some correlations to the el Nino in the 0.6 to 0.8 range depending on how I pick the points. Short segments of any curve don't always project well, even CPC's forcases have extremes. If you remember 6 years ago my long range forecast was for a 1997 like el Nino in this time frame. I had not considered the fact that Jupiter was in opposition then and is in conjunction now. This difference makes the sum of aphelion and perihelion larger now, meaning that the Earth is further from the Sun now then it was in 1997. I don't expect to see a -35 SOI. My point about the ENSO being more neutral longer is a geologic reference to the long cycle and the approach of a cusp of sort that will occur in about 4 years or so when more gravitational energy plays into the system.
No I don't since I was here 2 years ago. I still do not you the theory but I started closely following ENSO since 2014. I like your idea of the correlation but I wouldn't buy that forecast and theory just yet. I really think you should know most of us do not know of the connection and all those terms actually since this is an ocean climate thread not astroscience. I do not know any of these connections and not always certain since the connections have differences with the SOI values and SST anomalies. Plus SOI values only are the difference between the pressures of Darwin and Tahiti not solely in connection with the aphelion.
Yes I get your point with the latitude, but since that hypothesis you said about the geologic reference resulting to a longer neutral period of time became bunk, we're seeing a double El Niño. So the conclusion? It is not always certain whether ENSO totally correlates in the latitude and moon phases. See this year
I think my null hypothesis would be more accurately stated as: “ the period between 2012 to 2017 will experience neutral to weak el Nino conditions”