CrazyC83 wrote:Based on that RapidSCAT, agreed with 50 kt for the initial intensity. Also the genesis time I could see being pushed back to 0000Z.
They upped the 12z from 35kts to 40kts.
EP, 01, 2015052812, , BEST, 0, 111N, 1110W, 40, 1002, TS
Moderator: S2k Moderators
CrazyC83 wrote:Based on that RapidSCAT, agreed with 50 kt for the initial intensity. Also the genesis time I could see being pushed back to 0000Z.
cycloneye wrote:CrazyC83 wrote:Based on that RapidSCAT, agreed with 50 kt for the initial intensity. Also the genesis time I could see being pushed back to 0000Z.
They upped the 12z from 35kts to 40kts.
EP, 01, 2015052812, , BEST, 0, 111N, 1110W, 40, 1002, TS
TropicalAnalystwx13 wrote:A recent ASCAT pass showing several 40-45kt wind barbs and one 50kt barb is likely why NHC upped it:
CrazyC83 wrote:TropicalAnalystwx13 wrote:A recent ASCAT pass showing several 40-45kt wind barbs and one 50kt barb is likely why NHC upped it:
Given the low bias and earlier data, I could even see a case for 60 kt right now.
Yellow Evan wrote:Is it me or is this developing a banding eye?
Yellow Evan wrote:Also worth pointing out that dry air appears to be getting in the core. Could slow RI for an hour or so.
Kingarabian wrote:Yellow Evan wrote:Also worth pointing out that dry air appears to be getting in the core. Could slow RI for an hour or so.
Certainly, but usually when we see dry air intrusion you would see a "crack" within the deep convection. This thing seems to be wrapping and becoming warmer; typically seen when an eye is trying to form.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests