COMPARISONS TO FLOYD?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
AussieMark
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5858
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
Location: near Sydney, Australia

COMPARISONS TO FLOYD?

#1 Postby AussieMark » Wed Sep 17, 2003 12:57 am

Could Isabel be as damaging as Floyd or slightly less or slightly more. (Potentially).

Or was Floyd an isolated incident that will never be repeated. (500-year flood levels)
0 likes   

SolakNC
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:24 pm
Location: Outer Banks, NC

#2 Postby SolakNC » Wed Sep 17, 2003 1:04 am

Remember----floyd followed on the heels of Dennis...total rain in some areas between the 2 was 31"....we didn't have that much with Henri's remnants, but recent rains have soaked the ground....I wouldn't expect AS much flooding, but could still be bad, depending on how fast Isabel moves.
0 likes   

User avatar
NC George
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 633
Age: 55
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 11:44 am
Location: Washington, NC, USA

One key difference

#3 Postby NC George » Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:11 am

The rivers, and creeks are all a lot lower now then they were the day Floyd hit. The Tar river in Greenville was already almost at flood stage (13 feet) before Floyd hit, right now it's at 4 feet. When I left for work the day Floyd hit, the stream near my house was already almost at the bottom of the bridge (when I returned home from work during the hurricane the stream was flooding my yard, 50 yards away from the bridge, and the bridge was 5 feet under water, and I had to make a 10 miles detour to get home (I live just on the other side of the stream as I normally return home.) Today, the stream is a trickle, not even visible from the road over it.

Link for Tar River data:

http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nc/nwis/uv/?site_no=02084000&PARAmeter_cd=00065,00060

I think this will be most like Fran. The local channel 9 weather dude (David Sawyer) just showed a windfield map, and it had hurricane force winds coming in at about Morehead City then over Greenville then moving over Rocky Mount and then on to Virginia before diminshing into TS force winds. He showed the eye passing right between G'ville and Washington. This portion of the NC coast is the shortest 'as-the-crow-flies' to Greenville, less than 65 miles from the water, 55 miles from the water to my house in Ayden.
0 likes   

User avatar
ncbird
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 9:13 pm
Location: Jones County, NC

#4 Postby ncbird » Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:24 am

This will definetly not be a Floyd. Floyd drop never ending rain. If I remember correctly there were area's that recieved over 20 inches and like NC George said, we were already flooding from Dennis and the return of Dennis. I must agree with NC George that this is going to be much more like a Fran, and in fact that was what my husband and I were just talking about as we watched the 5am update come in.

Even though it is not as bad as it could have been, it is still dangerous, and we must not throw caution to the wind. I hate when they say ONLY a cat 2 on the TV.... there is nothing about a cat 2 that is ONLY.... this is a strong cat 2 and it still can take down trees and do a lot of damage.

Will be leaving from my Mobil home to go to a safer location later this morning. All those in Isabels path be safe.

ncbird
0 likes   
My posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just ramblings of an old Grandma who loves tropical storms, and are not backed by any type of sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Nature's Fury
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 8:32 pm
Location: Benson, North Carolina
Contact:

#5 Postby Nature's Fury » Wed Sep 17, 2003 6:04 am

With my relatives living at Topsail Island, they are being told that Isabelle is a weak storm and she is nothing to worry about. Many people aren't leaving the beach to come inland as the media is confusing. Some say they should leave and some say they should leave. Hopefully with the Mandatory Evacs. today they will leave.

Angela
0 likes   

North Georgia
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 10:40 am
Location: Cumming GA

#6 Postby North Georgia » Wed Sep 17, 2003 9:21 am

I read a news report this morning saying that seasoned old timers on the banks were pooh-poohing this storm, choosing to ride it out. One guy even says he's staying on his 35-foot houseboat with a bottle of rum. They all hear 'weakening storm' over and over, and hey, it's incovenient to evacuate. Much easier to just board things up and rent some movies.
0 likes   

cjh034
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 3:27 pm
Location: Bel Air, MD

#7 Postby cjh034 » Wed Sep 17, 2003 12:25 pm

NC George - according to the weather channel last night North Carolina's coast is +21" above normal rainfall for the last 12 months. If that is correct the ground would be pretty saturated.
0 likes   

User avatar
NC George
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 633
Age: 55
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 11:44 am
Location: Washington, NC, USA

True

#8 Postby NC George » Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:19 pm

so there may be some flash flooding, but at least the rivers aren't full and the water has some place to go. Right now at the tar river the flow is about 600 ft^3/min, it can take around 11,000 ft^3/min before it floods. So there is room for about 10,000 ft^3/min of water before we even get to where we started with Floyd.

Another fact to consider, we had a drought here for almost 3 years prior to this year, the extra rain this year is only filling the aquifers that were severely depleted last summer. As previously noted, the stream near my house is almost dry, the rivers are low, shouldn't be a mega-flood like Floyd, just flash floods as the water gets to the river.

As a side not to the conditions, there are overcast skies, the humidity has skyrocketed compared to yesterday, and winds have become breezy at times from the N, I'd say a hurricane was a comin'
0 likes   

User avatar
AussieMark
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5858
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
Location: near Sydney, Australia

#9 Postby AussieMark » Fri Sep 19, 2003 10:16 pm

Did you know that Floyd and Isabel were similar storms.

<B>Hurricane Force Winds</B>
Floyd - 115 miles
Isabel - 115 miles

<B>Tropical Storm Force Winds</B>
Floyd - 260 miles
Isabel - 345 miles

They were also similar intensity at landfall
Floyd - 105 mph
Isabel - 100 mph
0 likes   

floydchaser
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 3:21 pm

#10 Postby floydchaser » Fri Sep 19, 2003 10:23 pm

Floyd was more intense at landfall than Isabel, based on wind estimates and radar depictions. Even though Floyd weakened as he approached Wilmington, he still retained a semblance of a well defined northern eyewall. Isabel's eyewall was very unimpressive. That's why her flight level winds, which were in the 120-130 mph range, didn't reach the ground. Some of Floyd's upper level winds did reach the ground, and there was a huge disparity in wind speeds measured in the Cape Fear area (Wilmington EOC clocked a gust of 130). Floyd's surge was actually worse as well, but he was hitting an area that had already dealt with 4 previous hurricanes, including Fran which pretty much beat up everything there was to be beaten up. Flood wise, there is certainly no comparision. The only way in which Isabel was worse is that she tracked west of the major metro areas, putting them on the NE quad of the storm, while Floyd tracked to their east.
0 likes   

JetMaxx

#11 Postby JetMaxx » Fri Sep 19, 2003 10:32 pm

Based on damage I've seen on tv and news websites, this was clearly the worst hurricane to strike the Outer Banks since Donna in 1960 (it looks almost as bad as Dauphin Island, Alabama after hurricane Frederic in 79').

I know Emily caused significant flooding from Pamlico Sound on Hatteras Island, but it wasn't this bad....and neither was Gloria (I don't remember seeing beach houses washed into Pamlico Sound....or inlets being cut by the storm surge in either of those hurricanes).

I imagine there are a lot of people that stayed along the Outer Banks and refused to evacuate for Isabel that tonight wish to God they'd left (I saw one on tv a few minutes ago...said he was lucky to be alive :o
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22984
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

The Question

#12 Postby wxman57 » Fri Sep 19, 2003 10:34 pm

I believe the question was whether Isabel could be more damaging than Floyd, not stronger. Although Isabel was a bit weaker, it hit head-on into a much more populated area than did Floyd. And Isabel's larger area of TS-force winds means a much larger area was affected. There wasn't as much rain, but already more than twice as many people are without power after Isabel (probably more than that). I think Isabel could end up being more damaging than Floyd, dollar-wise. But it doesn't take wind-power to make a storm damaging. For example:

Floyd: $4.5 Billion Dollars (Cat 2)

Allison: $5+ billion dollars (weak TS at landfall, but weak remnant low when it caused all the damage in Houston in 2001).

If Floyd ends up more damaging than Isabel, it is due to the more extensive flooding.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hurricaneman and 81 guests