
It also starts development in 78-84hrs. and peaks @ 990mb before heading Northwest towards the Central Atlantic and Bermuda into the stable dry air.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
TheStormExpert wrote::uarrow: Just by that satellite image you posted you can tell it already has a nice spin/vorticity to it..
TheStormExpert wrote: It also starts development in 78-84hrs. and peaks @ 990mb before heading Northwest towards the Central Atlantic and Bermuda into the stable dry air.
TheStormExpert wrote::uarrow: Just by that satellite image you posted you can tell it already has a nice spin/vorticity to it.
It also starts development in 78-84hrs. and peaks @ 990mb before heading Northwest towards the Central Atlantic and Bermuda into the stable dry air.
WPBWeather wrote:TheStormExpert wrote::uarrow: Just by that satellite image you posted you can tell it already has a nice spin/vorticity to it.
It also starts development in 78-84hrs. and peaks @ 990mb before heading Northwest towards the Central Atlantic and Bermuda into the stable dry air.
I think the central Atlantic is and has been dominated by a large high pressure system for some time now. Any weak or strong storms would steer around that, wouldn't they? And that is a danger this year as any storm that stays together gets steered our way.
TheStormExpert wrote:WPBWeather wrote:TheStormExpert wrote::uarrow: Just by that satellite image you posted you can tell it already has a nice spin/vorticity to it.
It also starts development in 78-84hrs. and peaks @ 990mb before heading Northwest towards the Central Atlantic and Bermuda into the stable dry air.
I think the central Atlantic is and has been dominated by a large high pressure system for some time now. Any weak or strong storms would steer around that, wouldn't they? And that is a danger this year as any storm that stays together gets steered our way.
Actually there has been a persistent trough along the U.S. East Coast as of lately.
LarryWx wrote:I always like to consider climo of similar ENSO as one factor in trying to determine the likelihood of model predicted genesis in the MDR as well as the likelihood of anything from there later hitting the CONUS. For the 23 El Nino's that peaked as moderate to strong since 1877, have any storms on record that obtained TS strength east of 40W within the MDR actually reached the CONUS as a tropical cyclone? Believe it or not regarding the 14 storms in that category, the answer is yes though there was only one and it was way back in 1899:
2009's Ana, Bill, Fred: none did though Bill missed the NE US by only 200 miles still as a cat 1 H and the remnants of Fred somehow actually did make it to the SE US! (though it was no longer a TD)
2002's Dolly: no
1997: no TS's on record east of 40W in the MDR
1991's Danny: no
1987's Bret and Dennis: no
1986: no TS's on record east of 40W in the MDR
1982's Beryl: no
1972: no TS's on record east of 40W in the MDR
1965's Carol: no
1963: no TS's on record east of 40W in the MDR
1957's Carrie: no
1941, 1940, 1930, 1925, 1918, 1911, 1905: no TS's on record east of 40W in the MDR
1902's #3: no
1899's #3, #5, #7: #3 made it to the NC Outer Banks as a cat 3 before sharply recurving out to sea
1896, 1888, 1877: no TS's on record east of 40W in the MDR
Conclusion: 1) As is well known for stronger El Nino's, the threat to the CONUS from the eastern MDR is very low. However, 1899 shows that there is always the rare exception and 2009 shows that there was a relatively close call to the NE (Bill).
2) Based on the 8 moderate to strong El Nino seasons since the satellite era began (1966), an average of only exactly 1.0 storms became a TS east of 40W within the MDR vs. 1.7 storms for the other 41 seasons. Of those 8 seasons, 5 of them had at least one of those. So, it wouldn't be surprising if one did form there this season. Even the super Nino of 1982 had one (Beryl) though 1997 and 1972 had none. My educated guess is that either one or zero will become a TS east of 40W within the MDR but that none will hit the CONUS. If one does form there, it could obviously be the one that the 12Z GFS is showing.
Siker wrote:The greatest inhibitor this storm would encounter on the GFS's path is sub 26°C waters. Passing over those for a decent amount of time = weakening / opening up = losing any anticyclone aloft and succumbing to shear even after passing back into sufficiently warm waters.
SouthDadeFish wrote:Siker wrote:The greatest inhibitor this storm would encounter on the GFS's path is sub 26°C waters. Passing over those for a decent amount of time = weakening / opening up = losing any anticyclone aloft and succumbing to shear even after passing back into sufficiently warm waters.
Great point about the SSTs. Even if a TC does quickly develop by the Cape Verde islands, chances are it will quickly move into an environment that is unfavorable from a thermodynamic perspective. Cold SSTs and lots of dry air. This is what the 18Z GFS is showing.
Hammy wrote:Euro is showing two strong waves, one being 1004mb, over west Africa at 240 hours, and GFS is showing development of the current wave in less than 72 hours now, so in three days we find out if the upgrades were worth anything.
TheStormExpert wrote:Hammy wrote:Euro is showing two strong waves, one being 1004mb, over west Africa at 240 hours, and GFS is showing development of the current wave in less than 72 hours now, so in three days we find out if the upgrades were worth anything.
IMO it would be really bad and pathetic if the GFS failed this since it's now only 60-72hrs. out! Even I'm still very skeptical about this.
Would not blame the NHC if they refuse to lemon this area right away since the GFS has a bad history in the past season or so.
Siker wrote:TheStormExpert wrote:Hammy wrote:Euro is showing two strong waves, one being 1004mb, over west Africa at 240 hours, and GFS is showing development of the current wave in less than 72 hours now, so in three days we find out if the upgrades were worth anything.
IMO it would be really bad and pathetic if the GFS failed this since it's now only 60-72hrs. out! Even I'm still very skeptical about this.
Would not blame the NHC if they refuse to lemon this area right away since the GFS has a bad history in the past season or so.
Yeah, it's a little sad that a lot of people (including myself) wouldn't be surprised if nothing came of this system, despite it moving from the medium to short range over the course of 15 GFS runs, because of the GFS's history with this sort of thing.
Michael Ventrice
@MJVentrice
I wouldn't place bets on the GFS regarding possible Cape Verde system; Convection, diurnal cycle, AEW issues at play.
9:28 AM - 3 Aug 2015
AJC3 wrote:LarryWx wrote:I always like to consider climo of similar ENSO as one factor in trying to determine the likelihood of model predicted genesis in the MDR as well as the likelihood of anything from there later hitting the CONUS. For the 23 El Nino's that peaked as moderate to strong since 1877, have any storms on record that obtained TS strength east of 40W within the MDR actually reached the CONUS as a tropical cyclone? Believe it or not regarding the 14 storms in that category, the answer is yes though there was only one and it was way back in 1899:
2009's Ana, Bill, Fred: none did though Bill missed the NE US by only 200 miles still as a cat 1 H and the remnants of Fred somehow actually did make it to the SE US! (though it was no longer a TD)
2002's Dolly: no
1997: no TS's on record east of 40W in the MDR
1991's Danny: no
1987's Bret and Dennis: no
1986: no TS's on record east of 40W in the MDR
1982's Beryl: no
1972: no TS's on record east of 40W in the MDR
1965's Carol: no
1963: no TS's on record east of 40W in the MDR
1957's Carrie: no
1941, 1940, 1930, 1925, 1918, 1911, 1905: no TS's on record east of 40W in the MDR
1902's #3: no
1899's #3, #5, #7: #3 made it to the NC Outer Banks as a cat 3 before sharply recurving out to sea
1896, 1888, 1877: no TS's on record east of 40W in the MDR
Conclusion: 1) As is well known for stronger El Nino's, the threat to the CONUS from the eastern MDR is very low. However, 1899 shows that there is always the rare exception and 2009 shows that there was a relatively close call to the NE (Bill).
2) Based on the 8 moderate to strong El Nino seasons since the satellite era began (1966), an average of only exactly 1.0 storms became a TS east of 40W within the MDR vs. 1.7 storms for the other 41 seasons. Of those 8 seasons, 5 of them had at least one of those. So, it wouldn't be surprising if one did form there this season. Even the super Nino of 1982 had one (Beryl) though 1997 and 1972 had none. My educated guess is that either one or zero will become a TS east of 40W within the MDR but that none will hit the CONUS. If one does form there, it could obviously be the one that the 12Z GFS is showing.
I never fail to be impressed by some of the solid research that many of our members post, both amateur and professional. This is another example of some great info. Thanks for posting it!
Users browsing this forum: LarryWx and 25 guests