
Chris, this is almost unbelievable.
All that shear + dry air and it managed to strengthen enough to have its eyewall closed?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Chris_in_Tampa wrote:It is impressive it remains stacked despite the high analysed shear. The flight level center and surface center are aligned. When the sonde fell from flight level it landed where the surface center is, with just 5 knots of wind from the north.
Yellow Evan wrote:I'm not sure if the shear analyzed is real. This is why they should have sent a mission to sample the upper atmosphere.
Yellow Evan wrote:Chris_in_Tampa wrote:It is impressive it remains stacked despite the high analysed shear. The flight level center and surface center are aligned. When the sonde fell from flight level it landed where the surface center is, with just 5 knots of wind from the north.
I'm not sure if the shear analyzed is real. This is why they should have sent a mission to sample the upper atmosphere.
Kingarabian wrote::uarrow:
Chris, this is almost unbelievable.
All that shear + dry air and it managed to strengthen enough to have its eyewall closed?
Alyono wrote:Kingarabian wrote::uarrow:
Chris, this is almost unbelievable.
All that shear + dry air and it managed to strengthen enough to have its eyewall closed?
my suspicion is that the shear plots are dead wrong. 40 kts of shear would decapitate a small TC. This seems like 20 kts of shear
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests