ATL: ERIKA - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
ninel conde

Re:

#3061 Postby ninel conde » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:08 pm

gatorcane wrote:One other problem with regeneration is that the wind shear is quite strong. Actually it looks like the "favorable" conditions never happened had Erika taken the northern route through the Bahamas as the wind shear looks high there too. It's just too hostile out there for TCs it seems.


favorable conditions are often dependent on a strong storm to be there. erika didnt go north of the islands so the conditions turned hostile.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7182
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

ATL: ERIKA - Remnants - Discussion

#3062 Postby jlauderdal » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:10 pm

blp wrote:Well NHC gives it 40% for regeneration.

Image

40% this close to the USA would have this board hopping if it wasn't degenerated erika in play

Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk
0 likes   

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2106
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: ATL: ERIKA - Remnants - Discussion

#3063 Postby BobHarlem » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:12 pm

The final discussion for Erika mentioned this

"The dynamical models suggests that the current strong wind shear
could relax by the time the system reaches the Gulf of Mexico, and
there is a possibility that Erika could regenerate. "

Which is counter to what wxman is saying?
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: ERIKA - Remnants - Discussion

#3064 Postby Dean4Storms » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:30 pm

BobHarlem wrote:The final discussion for Erika mentioned this

"The dynamical models suggests that the current strong wind shear
could relax by the time the system reaches the Gulf of Mexico, and
there is a possibility that Erika could regenerate. "

Which is counter to what wxman is saying?


Shear maps I've seen have it lessening under 15 kts in the SE Gulf by the time Erika's remnants get there tomorrow. The ULL causing the SW shear is forecast to lift NE.

AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION...UPDATED
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MOBILE AL
636 AM CDT SAT AUG 29 2015

[SUNDAY THROUGH MONDAY NIGHT]...THE UPPER CUTOFF LOW OVER EASTERN
ALABAMA WILL LIFT NORTHEAST ON SUNDAY AND EVOLVE INTO AN OPEN WAVE AS
IT MERGES WITH AN UPPER SHORTWAVE PASSING OVER THE LOWER GREAT LAKES
REGION. A SECONDARY TROUGH WILL BECOME HIGHLY AMPLIFIED FROM THE
GREAT LAKES TO NORTHEAST MEXICO. MEANWHILE AN EXTENSION OF AN UPPER
RIDGE FROM THE LARGE UPPER HIGH PRESSURE SYSTEM OVER THE WESTERN
ATLANTIC WILL BUILD OVER THE SOUTHEAST STATES SUNDAY NIGHT THROUGH
MONDAY.
0 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: ERIKA - Remnants - Discussion

#3065 Postby blp » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:30 pm

jlauderdal wrote:
blp wrote:Well NHC gives it 40% for regeneration.

[]http://i58.tinypic.com/5v2mv4.png[/img]

40% this close to the USA would have this board hopping if it wasn't degenerated erika in play

Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk


Yep, I think people are exhausted by Ericka. I am one of those but still I am here for some reason. I think now it is more like I want to see if Ericka can do it again and defy the experts.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: ERIKA - Remnants - Discussion

#3066 Postby Sanibel » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:31 pm

It'll probably refire, but once again might not mean anything.


Hard to say. Sometimes struggling systems finally get it together once they head North. I doubt it will be naked when it passes us to the west.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: ERIKA - Remnants - Discussion

#3067 Postby Dean4Storms » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:33 pm

Frank P wrote:This sure looks like a pretty good feeder band that just developed on the western side of the LLC... first time I've seen any real convection on the western side of the tropical storm formally named Erika in recent days... either that or a massive out flow its getting ready to chunk!

Image



If this Vort slows down and the convection increases around it then I believe it could regenerate. There is still a good bit of energy there and a vort this small is likely not getting picked up by the Global Models much like they missed Danny.
0 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: ERIKA - Remnants - Discussion

#3068 Postby blp » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:33 pm

Dean4Storms wrote:
BobHarlem wrote:The final discussion for Erika mentioned this

"The dynamical models suggests that the current strong wind shear
could relax by the time the system reaches the Gulf of Mexico, and
there is a possibility that Erika could regenerate. "

Which is counter to what wxman is saying?


Shear maps I've seen have it lessening under 15 kts in the SE Gulf by the time Erika's remnants get there tomorrow. The ULL causing the SW shear is forecast to lift NE.

AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION...UPDATED
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE MOBILE AL
636 AM CDT SAT AUG 29 2015

[SUNDAY THROUGH MONDAY NIGHT]...THE UPPER CUTOFF LOW OVER EASTERN
ALABAMA WILL LIFT NORTHEAST ON SUNDAY AND EVOLVE INTO AN OPEN WAVE AS
IT MERGES WITH AN UPPER SHORTWAVE PASSING OVER THE LOWER GREAT LAKES
REGION. A SECONDARY TROUGH WILL BECOME HIGHLY AMPLIFIED FROM THE
GREAT LAKES TO NORTHEAST MEXICO. MEANWHILE AN EXTENSION OF AN UPPER
RIDGE FROM THE LARGE UPPER HIGH PRESSURE SYSTEM OVER THE WESTERN
ATLANTIC WILL BUILD OVER THE SOUTHEAST STATES SUNDAY NIGHT THROUGH
MONDAY.


Shear forecast are so unreliable. With Ericka they all had very favorable conditions in the Bahamas and now they are unfavorable. I have also learned that in El Nino years it is even worse.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3538
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

#3069 Postby Extratropical94 » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:35 pm

90L INVEST 150829 1800 22.4N 77.5W ATL 35 1012
0 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: ERIKA - Remnants - Discussion

#3070 Postby Sanibel » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:35 pm

Watch what happens after it crosses the Gulf Stream.
0 likes   

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Re: ATL: ERIKA - Remnants - Discussion

#3071 Postby Frank P » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:36 pm

Dean4Storms wrote:
Frank P wrote:This sure looks like a pretty good feeder band that just developed on the western side of the LLC... first time I've seen any real convection on the western side of the tropical storm formally named Erika in recent days... either that or a massive out flow its getting ready to chunk!

Image



If this Vort slows down and the convection increases around it then I believe it could regenerate. There is still a good bit of energy there and a vort this small is likely not getting picked up by the Global Models much like they missed Danny.


I just looked at the vis loop and what I thought might be a western side feeder band is actually looking more like an outflow boundary... shear still too strong and I think its also going to fast.. she is in a hurry to go somewhere for sure..
0 likes   

SunnyThoughts
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2263
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Pensacola, Florida

#3072 Postby SunnyThoughts » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:38 pm

According to The Weather Channel, since Ex-Erika has now been classified as Invest 90L, if it becomes a tropical Storm it will be given a new name.


So if it were to regenerate into a storm ( Big fat if) it would have a new name? After all the craziness with this storm, it wouldn't surprise me at all.
0 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: ERIKA - Remnants - Discussion

#3073 Postby blp » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:41 pm

0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

#3074 Postby northjaxpro » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:43 pm

I am curious as to why NHC re-designated Ericka's remanants as 90L? I can't recall a recent time when NHC did that with a tropical cyclone's remnants.

Apparently they must have recently changed their critieria about this becuase in past times I was of the thought that if remnants can be traced and tracked from the point NHC declassified the cyclone to remnants, that if regeneration occurs, that system would retain its name. So, when this change?
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2106
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re:

#3075 Postby BobHarlem » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:44 pm

northjaxpro wrote:I am curious as to why NHC re-designated Ericka's remanants as 90L? I can't recall a recent time when NHC did that with a tropical cyclone's remnants.

Apparently they must have recently changed their critieria about this becuase in past times I was of the thought that if remnants can be traced and tracked from the point NHC declassified the cyclone to remnants, that if regeneration occurs, that system would retain its name. So, when this change?


Just when you thought Erika couldn't be any more confusing for the general public, first that 8AM Track graphic and now this -- not to mention the entire forecast since Thursday. (Hell it's confusing for most of us here)
Last edited by BobHarlem on Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re:

#3076 Postby AutoPenalti » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:46 pm

SunnyThoughts wrote:According to The Weather Channel, since Ex-Erika has now been classified as Invest 90L, if it becomes a tropical Storm it will be given a new name.


So if it were to regenerate into a storm ( Big fat if) it would have a new name? After all the craziness with this storm, it wouldn't surprise me at all.

They are wrong. Why reclassify it a different name? It makes no sense to do that.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

#3077 Postby northjaxpro » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:49 pm

The decision by NHC to designate Erika's remnants to 90L is really a head scratcher for me!! This really caught me by surprise and many other people will be as well.
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#3078 Postby Evil Jeremy » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:53 pm

One benefit of the new classification is that the hurricane models will be run for the system. I remember countless times declassified storms with a chance of regeneration did not have UKMET/GFDL/HWRF runs because there was no active invest attached. I'm sure there are other internal benefits to having an active Invest, and of course they couldn't go back to 98L (I think that's what Erika was, right?)
Last edited by Evil Jeremy on Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3538
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Re: Re:

#3079 Postby Extratropical94 » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:54 pm

AutoPenalti wrote:
SunnyThoughts wrote:According to The Weather Channel, since Ex-Erika has now been classified as Invest 90L, if it becomes a tropical Storm it will be given a new name.


So if it were to regenerate into a storm ( Big fat if) it would have a new name? After all the craziness with this storm, it wouldn't surprise me at all.

They are wrong. Why reclassify it a different name? It makes no sense to do that.


They won't call it anything except Erika. We had the same discussion three years ago with Helena. When TD07 dissipated and its circulation was disrupted und became difficult to track, the redeveloping system was still called 07L (TS Helena near the Yucatan).

As to the invest numbering, Dorian 2013 was Invest 98L before formation, then dissipated and was given the invest number 91L. When it regenerated near Florida, it was still 04L (TD Dorian).

In 2005, it was the other way round. TD10 dissipated and the moisture and energy persisted to eventually become TD12 (Katrina).
0 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: Re:

#3080 Postby northjaxpro » Sat Aug 29, 2015 1:59 pm

Extratropical94 wrote:
AutoPenalti wrote:
SunnyThoughts wrote:According to The Weather Channel, since Ex-Erika has now been classified as Invest 90L, if it becomes a tropical Storm it will be given a new name.


So if it were to regenerate into a storm ( Big fat if) it would have a new name? After all the craziness with this storm, it wouldn't surprise me at all.

They are wrong. Why reclassify it a different name? It makes no sense to do that.


They won't call it anything except Erika. We had the same discussion three years ago with Helena. When TD07 dissipated and its circulation was disrupted und became difficult to track, the redeveloping system was still called 07L (TS Helena near the Yucatan).

As to the invest numbering, Dorian 2013 was Invest 98L before formation, then dissipated and was given the invest number 91L. When it regenerated near Florida, it was still 04L (TD Dorian).

In 2005, it was the other way round. TD10 dissipated and the moisture and energy persisted to eventually become TD12 (Katrina).
In 2005, it was the other way round. TD10 dissipated and the moisture and energy persisted to eventually become TD12 (Katrina).


Ok , thanks for the explanation, This somehow slipped my mind about the re-numbering procedure. But, this system if it re-develops will still be referred to as Erika as it should be!
Last edited by northjaxpro on Sat Aug 29, 2015 2:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019


Return to “2015”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests