
Would you just look at that. Guidance was just pointing at Jimena reaching the west coast and Canada and now it's Hawaii. Crazy.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Alyono wrote:watch this end up missing Hawaii to the southeast afterall...
Alyono wrote:that forecast is weaker than the global models show. Leans too heavily on SHIPS guidance, IMPO. I have this maintaining 60 kts through 7 days, though there is quite a bit of uncertainty in that
Alyono wrote:looks like its weakening
I wonder if the global models do not have the properly cooled SSTs after Ignacio moved through the area and due to Jimena's slow motion. May make the solutions of a track toward Hawaii utterly worthless as we may be dealing with a convectionless swirl due to the upwelled SSTs
Alyono wrote:27C is fine for an intense TC. However, I suspect given the slow motion, SSTs will be closer to 25C for a while
Yellow Evan wrote:Alyono wrote:27C is fine for an intense TC. However, I suspect given the slow motion, SSTs will be closer to 25C for a while
There have been instances where TC's in the East Pacific have deepened over 24-25C. The most greater concern is shear.
Kingarabian wrote:Yellow Evan wrote:Alyono wrote:27C is fine for an intense TC. However, I suspect given the slow motion, SSTs will be closer to 25C for a while
There have been instances where TC's in the East Pacific have deepened over 24-25C. The most greater concern is shear.
But Jimena is not annular.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests