


Hurricane Winnie in 1983.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Yellow Evan wrote:I'd like to point out that HURDAt is probs wrong, and in that in reality, this isn't the latest EPAC MH on record.
Hurricane Winnie in 1983.
ozonepete wrote:Look at that perfect symmetry and beautiful small eye. Wow!
CrazyC83 wrote:NHC keeps it at 105 kt. Probably believes this is temporary and lends itself to the T5.0/5.5 there.
CrazyC83 wrote:Going back on that point, even 2005 didn't have a November major in the Atlantic, let alone this late in the month. There has never been a major hurricane after Thanksgiving in the Atlantic, at least in the satellite era.
Kingarabian wrote:Yeah Beven likes to be on the safe side. Would've helped the ACE some if they bumped it up. Let's see if Sandra can still keep it up.
NHC wrote:HURRICANE SANDRA DISCUSSION NUMBER 14
NWS NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL EP222015
800 PM MST THU NOV 26 2015
Despite the presence of at least 25 kt of southwesterly vertical
wind shear, the satellite appearance of Sandra unexpectedly improved
near 0000 UTC when the eye became better defined. Whatever
re-intensification this represents has ended, however, as the eye
has again begun to lose definition. The initial intensity will be
held at 105 kt for this advisory, and the hurricane could have been
a little stronger than that three hours ago based on satellite
intensity estimates.
Yellow Evan wrote:I'd like to point out that HURDAt is probs wrong, and in that in reality, this isn't the latest EPAC MH on record.
Hurricane Winnie in 1983.
EquusStorm wrote:Honestly I really hope we DO get a Winnie-like system this year to top off the incredible season. At this rate I would not be shocked if we actually did get an early December system with the way the overall pattern seems to favor this fall... though I don't know if any models even hint of even the possibility of such right now.
Sandra's second wind was unexpected and impressive. Maybe the first structural collapse was the result of an ERC and not shear?
Kingarabian wrote:3 ACE units away from the record.
WeatherGuesser wrote:Kingarabian wrote:3 ACE units away from the record.
So, it's a done deal because it isn't about to die that quickly. Bound to be good for 5 or ....
EquusStorm wrote:Plus, post-season changes might increase Sandra's intensity on its second wind, so even if we don't break the ACE record, if we're really close, it's not impossible we could push just over it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests